This article needs attention from an expert in computer science. The specific problem is: contains buzzwords that should be explained in a less technical manner.WikiProject Computer science may be able to help recruit an expert.(July 2017)
One can write logical formulas in ATL such as that expresses the fact that agents a and b have a strategy to ensure that the property p holds in the future, whatever the other agents of the system are performing.
Extensions and variants
ATL* is the extension of ATL, as CTL* extends CTL. ATL* allows to write more complex temporal objectives, for instance . Belardinelli et al. proposes a variant of ATL on finite traces.[4] ATL has been extended with context, in order to store the current strategies played by the agents. ATL* is extended by strategy logic.
ATL has been generalized to include epistemic features. In 2003, van der Hoek and Woodridge proposed ATEL: the logic ATL augmented with an epistemic operator from epistemic logic.[5] In 2004, Pierre-Yves Schobbens proposed variants of ATL with imperfect recall.[6]
One cannot express properties about individual objectives in ATL. That is why, in 2010, Chatterjee, Henzinger and Piterman introduced strategy logic, a first-order logic in which strategies are first-order citizens.[7] Strategy logic subsumes both ATL and ATL*.
^van der Hoek, Wiebe; Wooldridge, Michael (2003-10-01). "Cooperation, Knowledge, and Time: Alternating-time Temporal Epistemic Logic and its Applications". Studia Logica. 75 (1): 125–157. doi:10.1023/A:1026185103185. ISSN1572-8730. S2CID10913405.