This form of the cross section makes the assumption that the target nucleus has an even number of neutrons and protons, in order to avoid small corrections from weak axial currents. Under the further assumption that the calculation is only taken at tree-level, the weak charge can also be expressed as
in terms of the proton and neutron weak charges or the weak mixing angle.[5] Given ,[7] the cross-section is approximately proportional to the square of the number of neutrons ().
Finally, a kinematic assumption is made, where , where .
This cross section form also assumes that the contributions from weak magnetism,[9][10] the strange quark contributions to the nuclear spin, the strange quark radius, and the effective neutrino charge radius[11] area all negligible. Furthermore, it neglects the contribution to low-energy recoils from incoherent neutrino-nuclear scattering.[12]
Proposal
Following the discovery of weak neutral currents in 1973, Freedman proposed a process analogous to coherent electromagnetic scattering of photons off of atoms involving neutrinos scattering coherently off of nuclei.[13] This process, whose suggestion was described by Freedman as "an act of hubris", went unobserved for nearly forty years.
It was immediately realized by Wilson that CEvNS could be responsible for re-invigorating the iron-layer shock front of a core-collapse neutron star.[14]
Our suggestion may be an act of hubris, because the inevitable constraints of interaction rate, resolution, and background pose grave experimental difficulties for elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering.
Forty-three years after its prediction, the process was first detected[1] in 2017 by the COHERENT Collaboration using a low-background CsI[Na] scintillator located at the Spallation Neutron Source in Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
This was followed by the first observation of CEvNS in a liquid argon[15] detector by the COHERENT collaboration in 2019, and the first observation of CEvNS on germanium in 2023.[16]
In 2025, the CONUS+[2] collaboration first detected CEvNS from reactor anti-neutrinos on germanium semiconductor detectors.
Scientific interest
CEvNS is cleanly predicted in the standard model of particle physics and thus provides a test of new physics. Searches and measurements of CEvNS have provided such tests as: the existence of exotic electromagnetic properties of the neutrino,[17] the existence of non-standard neutrino interactions[18] and the existence of new mediators.[19] CEvNS can also play a role in testing sterile neutrino hypotheses.[20]
Taken another way, under assumptions of the standard model, CEvNS can play a role in probing the nuclear physics encoded in the nuclear form factors of the cross-section. In particular, information about the distribution of neutrons such as the neutron skin-depth of the nucleus, which are hard to extract from electromagnetic scattering processes,[21] can be probed with CEvNS.
CEvNS also plays a role in supernova dynamics and its measurement in terrestrial experiments can inform modeling of the death of stars.[14]
Finally, CEvNS from solar and astrophysical neutrino sources is an irreducible background for direct detection WIMP dark matter experiments and its precise measurement in terrestrial experiments informs the sensitivity of these experiments.[23]
References
^ abAkimov, D.; Albert, J. B.; An, P.; Awe, C.; Barbeau, P. S.; Becker, B.; Belov, V.; Brown, A.; Bolozdynya, A.; Cabrera-Palmer, B.; Cervantes, M.; Collar, J. I.; Cooper, R. J.; Cooper, R. L.; Cuesta, C.; Dean, D. J.; Detwiler, J. A.; Eberhardt, A.; Efremenko, Y.; Elliott, S. R.; Erkela, E. M.; Fabris, L.; Febbraro, M.; Fields, N. E.; Fox, W.; Fu, Z.; Galindo-Uribarri, A.; Green, M. P.; Hai, M.; Heath, M. R.; Hedges, S.; Hornback, D.; Hossbach, T. W.; Iverson, E. B.; Kaufman, L. J.; Ki, S.; Klein, S. R.; Khromov, A.; Konovalov, A.; Kremer, M.; Kumpan, A.; Leadbetter, C.; Li, L.; Lu, W.; Mann, K.; Markoff, D. M.; Miller, K.; Moreno, H.; Mueller, P. E.; Newby, J.; Orrell, J. L.; Overman, C. T.; Parno, D. S.; Penttila, S.; Perumpilly, G.; Ray, H.; Raybern, J.; Reyna, D.; Rich, G. C.; Rimal, D.; Rudik, D.; Scholberg, K.; Scholz, B. J.; Sinev, G.; Snow, W. M.; Sosnovtsev, V.; Shakirov, A.; Suchyta, S.; Suh, B.; Tayloe, R.; Thornton, R. T.; Tolstukhin, I.; Vanderwerp, J.; Varner, R. L.; Virtue, C. J.; Wan, Z.; Yoo, J.; Yu, C.-H.; Zawada, A.; Zettlemoyer, J.; Zderic, A. M. (15 September 2017). "Observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering". Science. 357 (6356): 1123–1126. arXiv:1708.01294. Bibcode:2017Sci...357.1123C. doi:10.1126/science.aao0990. PMID28775215.
^ abAckermann, N.; Bonet, H.; Bonhomme, A.; Buck, C.; Fülber, K.; Hakenmüller, J.; Hempfling, J.; Heusser, G.; Lindner, M.; Maneschg, W.; Ni, K.; Rank, M.; Rink, T.; Sánchez Garcıa, E.; Stalder, I.; Strecker, H.; Wink, R.; Woenckhaus, J. (2025). "First observation of reactor antineutrinos by coherent scattering". arXiv:2501.05206 [hep-ex].
^ abAprile, E.; et al. (7 November 2024). "First Indication of Solar B 8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT". Physical Review Letters. 133 (19): 191002. arXiv:2408.02877. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.191002. PMID39576901.
^Drukier, A.; Stodolsky, L. (1 December 1984). "Principles and applications of a neutral-current detector for neutrino physics and astronomy". Physical Review D. 30 (11): 2295–2309. Bibcode:1984PhRvD..30.2295D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.2295.
^Sehgal, L.M. (November 1985). "Differences in the coherent interactions of ve, vμ, and vτ". Physics Letters B. 162 (4–6): 370–372. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90942-6.