Financial Secretaries Donald Tsang, Antony Leung, Henry Tang and John Tsang all defended the minimal intervention approach, however didn't called it Positive non-interventionism and didn't really advocated for it.[8]Donald Tsang called his economic policy "Big Market, Small Government".[9] During Tsang term as Financial Secretary of Hong Kong, Tsang coined the term "caring capitalism" in 1996, which describe the governments's approach of giving priority to economic growth and then using the new-found wealth to develop social infrastructure and welfare services.[10] William W. L. Wong argues that Hong Kong had under Donald Tsang a welfare capitalist system,[11] also Christian Aspalter has the view,[12] but Donald Tsang still used positive non-interventionist elements.[13] After Hong Kong became part of the People's Republic of China but before Donald Tsang, Hong Kong embraced a mix of a liberal economy and a welfare state.[14][15] While Peter Guy argues that Hong Kong embraces a predatory form of capitalism.[16]Welfare measures rose in 2012.[17]Leung Chun-ying also embraced like Tsang some positive non-interventionist elements[18][19] and also used it as an governance strategy.[20][21]Carrie Lam used like her predecessor positive non-interventionist elements[22] even after her pledging of a “new fiscal philosophy”.[8]
First-hand explanation
According to Cowperthwaite:
In the long run, the aggregate of decisions of individual businessmen, exercising individual judgment in a free economy, even if often mistaken, is less likely to do harm than the centralised decisions of a government; and certainly the harm is likely to be counteracted faster.[23]
According to Haddon-Cave:
positive non-interventionism involves taking the view that it is normally futile and damaging to the growth rate of an economy, particularly an open economy, for the Government to attempt to plan the allocation of resources available to the private sector and to frustrate the operation of market forces.
Haddon-Cave goes on to say that the "positive" part means the government carefully considers each possible intervention to determine "where the advantage" lies, and, although usually it will come to the conclusion that the intervention is harmful, sometimes it will decide to intervene.
Similar philosophies
While John Tsang Chun-wah wasn't a positive non-interventionist, he followed a fiscal conservative philosophy.[24] However he also embraced some social welfare programms.[25][26][27]Henry Tang supports free markets and a small government similar to Tsang's "Big Market, Small Government", however Tang's practice welfare maeasures aren't really known. It should be noted though that dozens of people aired their grievances to Henry Tang Ying-yen over the funding cuts to welfare services made over the past couple of years.[28] However later he claimed that some policies aimed for welfare, even when lawmakers were critical of this, after year's Tang promised higher rent for elders.[29][30] Times before he praised after all social enterprises.[31] also he promised more family-related refoms.[32] and romised more social welfare for social workers.[33] The practice things Tang did make Tang's philosophy closer to positive non-interventionism.[34] Tang openly embraces capitalism[35] and also admires the US PresidentCalvin Coolidge.[36]
^Schenk, Catherine R. (June 2017). "Negotiating Positive Non-interventionism: Regulating Hong Kong's Finance Companies, 1976–1986". The China Quarterly. 230: 348–370. doi:10.1017/S0305741017000637.
^Lau, Chi Kuen (1997). Hong Kong's Colonial Legacy. Chinese University Press. pp. 79–80.
^Wong, William W. L. (2007). "The Resilience of Personal Economy of Ageing: An Examination of the Productivist Welfare Capitalism of Hong Kong". Journal of Comparative Social Welfare. 23: 81–88. doi:10.1080/17486830601100008.
^Aspalter, Christian (14 December 2010). Different Worlds of Welfare Capitalism: Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Hong Kong and Singapore (Report). SSRN1725128.
^Sawada, Yukari (June 2004). "The Social Security System in Hong Kong: Establishment and Readjustment of the Liberal Welfare Model". The Developing Economies. 42 (2): 198–216. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1049.2004.tb01063.x.
^Chan, Raymond K.H. (July 2004). "Globalisation, Unemployment and the Welfare Regime in Hong Kong". Social Policy and Society. 3 (3): 273–282. doi:10.1017/S1474746404001782.
^Wang, Jue (March 2018). "Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong". Research Policy. 47 (2): 399–412. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.008.
