Shishumar-class submarine

INS Shishumar enters Port of Duqm, Oman.
Class overview
NameShishumar class
Builders
Operators Indian Navy
Preceded byVela class
Succeeded byKalvari class
Cost€300 million each[1]
In commission1986–present
Planned6
Completed4
Cancelled2
Active4
General characteristics [2]
TypeAttack submarine
Displacement
  • 1,450 t (1,427 long tons) standard
  • 1,660 t (1,634 long tons) surfaced
  • 1,850 t (1,821 long tons) submerged
Length64.4 m (211 ft 3 in)
Beam6.5 m (21 ft 4 in)
Draught6 m (19 ft 8 in)
Propulsion
  • 4 × MTU 12V 493 AZ80 GA31L diesel-electric motors, 2,400 hp (1,790 kW) each
  • 1 × Siemens motor, 4,600 hp (3,430 kW)
  • 4 × 1.8 MW Siemens alternators
  • 1 shaft
Speed
  • 11 knots (20 km/h; 13 mph) surfaced
  • 22 knots (41 km/h; 25 mph) submerged
Range
  • 8,000 nmi (15,000 km; 9,200 mi) at 8 kn (15 km/h; 9.2 mph)
  • 13,000 nmi (24,000 km; 15,000 mi) at 10 kn (19 km/h; 12 mph)
Complement40 (8 officers)
Sensors &
processing systems
  • Atlas Elektronik CSU 83 sonar
  • Thomson Sintra DUUX-5 passive sonar
  • Thomson-CSF Calypso surface search radar
Electronic warfare
& decoys
  • Argo Phoenix II AR 700 or Kollmorgen Sea Sentry
  • C 303 acoustic decoys
Armament

The Shishumar-class submarines (lit.'Dolphin') are diesel-electric attack submarines, currently in active service with the Indian Navy. These submarines are an Indian variant[4] of the Type 209 submarines developed by the German yard Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft under the internal designation "Type 1500". The first two vessels were built by HDW at Kiel, Germany, while the remainder were built by Mazagon Dock Limited, at Mumbai, India, under a technology transfer agreement.[5] The submarines were commissioned between 1986 and 1994. These submarines have a displacement of 1,660 tons when surfaced, a speed of 22 knots (41 km/h; 25 mph), and a complement of 40 including eight officers.

The Shishumar class is unique among Type 209s for having an IKL-designed integrated escape sphere. The sphere has accommodations for the entire crew with an eight-hour air supply.[6][7]

The submarines form the 10th Submarine Squadron at INS Vajrabahu, Mumbai.[8]

History

India signed the agreement for these submarines with Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft (HDW) on 11 December 1981. The agreement called for building of two submarines in West Germany, the supply of knocked-down kits for assembling two more submarines in Mazagon Dock Limited (MDL), and training for construction and logistics services. An agreement was announced in 1984 for the construction of two additional submarines in MDL, but was subsequently cancelled due to economic crisis in the late 1980s.[2] The four submarines that were finally built form the 10th submarine squadron based at Mumbai.[3]

Timeline

Source: [9][10]

  • February 1979: The Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs (CCPA) — the apex body for approval of all international contracts under the then Prime Minister of India Morarji Desai — approved the Indian Navy's programme to acquire four hunter-killer submarines (SSKs) capable of diving to a depth of 350 m (1,150 ft). The acquisition, worth 350 crore (equivalent to 90 billion or US$1.1 billion in 2023), would include the technology transfer for their indigenous co-production.
  • February 1979: Four offers were shortlisted by a nine-member negotiating committee, led by Additional Secretary of Defence M. K. Mukherjee. The four firms selected were Sweden’s Kockums, West Germany’s HDW, Italy’s Sauro and the TNSW-1400.
  • March 1979: The then Vice Chief of the Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Swaraj Parkash, appointed a six-member expert committee. The chief of the committee was Rear Admiral S. L. Sethi and also included Captain M. Kondath, the then Director (Submarines).
  • 16 May 1979: The six-member Sethi committee submitted its report to the Vice Chief of the Naval Staff. The Swedish 45-Kockums followed by the Italian Sauro submarine were the first and second preference of the committee, respectively. The HDW's submarine offer was rejected as it had a maximum diving depth of 250 m (820 ft) against the Navy's depth requirement of 350 m (1,150 ft).
  • 15 June 1979: HDW was put back on list by the committee given that they would improve the submarine's design to meet the Navy requirements.
  • Late June 1979: A delegation of officials from various ministries, led by Rear Admiral D. S. Painthal and including Captain Kondath, visited several shipyards across Europe and the United States to assess available options. The delegation concluded that the Kockums design was the best fit for the Indian Navy.
  • July 1979: There were significant changes in the Indian politics including the collapse of Desai ministry, which led to changes in the CCPA composition. Meanwhile, the Defence Ministry had prepared a draft paper for the CCPA, identifying the Kockums design as the best option at a cost of 318.79 crore (equivalent to 82 billion or US$970 million in 2023), compared to the more expensive HDW which would cost 336.81 crore (equivalent to 87 billion or US$1.0 billion in 2023). The paper also recommended reconstituting the negotiating team to enable a quick and final decision. However, due to the prevailing political uncertainty, the CCPA was unable to convene.
  • Early 1980: The competitors extended their offers until 30 June 1980. The Ministry of Defence kept forwarding their proposal where Kockums and HDW was shortlisted and it was recommended that the committee be headed by the Secretary (Defence Production).
  • 10 April 1980: The CCPA met under the new Prime Minister Indira Gandhi where the shortlisting was approved. However, the reconstitution of the committee was agreed to be decided upon by the Prime Minister.
  • 14 April 1980: The original committee met again but was presided over by the then newly-appointed Additional Secretary Shivinder Singh Sidhu. There were neither any written directives from the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) nor any official records found as to how Sidhu replaced the Secretary of Defence in the committee. During the meeting, he claimed that the CCPA had asked to constitute a new seven-member committee chaired by himself. However, there were reportedly no records for such a statement. Other members of the committee included B. M. Menon [Financial Adviser (Defence Services)], S. K. Banerjee (Solicitor, Ministry of Law), Vice Admiral M. R. Schunker, Lt General S .G. Payara [Chief Co-ordinator (R&D)], Joint Secretary D. N. Prashad and Vice Admiral N. R. Dutta (the then chief of the Mazagon Docks).
  • May 1980: Sidhu committee toured Germany and Sweden.
  • 17 May 1980: The committee held a formal meeting and switched its decision to HDW from the initial Kockums, citing the Kockums cost to be 403 crore (equivalent to 93 billion or US$1.1 billion in 2023) against HDW's 332 crore (equivalent to 77 billion or US$910 million in 2023)
  • 30 June 1980: The CCPA convened a meeting and approved the committee's proposal though it directed them to hold further negotiations. Following this, Sidhu was temporarily replaced by S. K. Bhatnagar, who chaired further meetings for all purposes and set the stage for the deal.
  • 11 December 1981: The contract was signed for four HDW submarines, along with torpedoes, at a cost of 465 crore (equivalent to 95 billion or US$1.1 billion in 2023). The submarines were to be delivered by 1987 following which another deal for further two boats could be placed.

Corruption charges

By mid-1987, only two submarines were delivered. Meanwhile, the then Defence Minister V. P. Singh, under the Rajiv Gandhi Ministry, he was informed that the Germans might have overcharged India and attempted so that the next batch of two submarines could be priced correctly. However, things took a turn when J. C. Ajmani, the Indian ambassador to Bonn, telegrammed the Defence Minister on 24 February 1987 that the Gernans alleged that the price could not be reduced since the contract included 7% commissions.[9][10]

V. P. Singh first saw this message in April and ordered an immediate inquiry in 9 April. On 12 April, Singh resigned from the ministry. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a First Information Report (FIR) in a New Delhi court identifying seven persons as principal conspirators in a criminal plot to award the contract to HDW, including S. K. Bhatnagar, former Defence Secretary; S. S. Sidhu, former Additional Secretary of Defence and the then secretary-general, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO); Captain M. Kondath, former Director (Submarines); B. S. Ramaswamy, former financial adviser to the Defence Ministry; Directors and agents of HDW; Directors and agents of AEG-T West Germany (torpedo supplier) and Directors of Ferrostaal. The charges included the failure of Indian Civil Servants to stand against HDW during negotiations and their acquiescence to its unrealistic financial demands, incorrect calculation of the HDW deal cost by Defence Ministry officials, manipulations to various technical and financial parameters of the HDW offer by senior officials and the members of the committee so as to rank HDW first against its earlier second preference and the change of price quotations by HDW, AEG-T and Ferrostaal without informing the government.[9][10]

S. S. Sidhu was the prime accused as per the CBI investigation. Allegations registered against him ranged from manipulation of techno-commercial data as well as declaring himself chairman of negotiating committee without documentation which was accepted as a fait accompli and misinforming the CCPA about the Germans willing to sign a memorandum of understanding on transfer of technology. The Germans under the norms of NATO security compulsions were not meant to transfer the technology and they ultimately did not do so.[9][10]

S. K. Bhatnagar had taken over Sidhu as the Additional Secretary of Defence and was responsible for finalising the deal. He reportedly dismissed the suggestions of the committee members to reopen the deal process before CCPA in due of the altered technical and financial details. He also ignored the then Vice Admiral M. R. Schunker's appeal during the meeting of 18 October 1980 about the technical specifications of HDW being unacceptable to the Navy. Schunker also stated during a meeting in November that the capabilities of the torpedo to be supplied by AEG-T could not be evaluated since classified data were not disclosed by the German Government. However, the appeal was also ignored by Bhatnagar.[9][10]

Captain M. Kondath, a key official in the SSK project, allegedly manipulated figures in favour of HDW while serving as Director (Submarine Armament). Accused of inflating Kockums’ cost and seeking post-retirement employment with HDW, he applied for premature retirement soon after the deal's approval. Though denied permission to join HDW, he continued liaising with its associates and later joined Ferrostaal. Meanwhile, financial adviser B.S. Ramaswamy allegedly inflated Kockums' cost by misapplying escalation to fixed components, making HDW appear cheaper. Both the CBI and PAC later found Kockums was actually less expensive, contradicting Ramaswamy’s calculations used to justify the HDW deal.[9][10]

Mid Life Upgrades and Service history

The Indian Navy awarded a $151 million contract for mid-life upgrade and certification of INS Shishumar in 2018. The refit was carried out by MDL at Mumbai with technical cooperation from ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems.[11][12] The refit was planned to be completed by 2021 with a similar upgrade for another vessel of Shishumar-class submarine to follow. [11] The ship was expected to be delivered by 2021 but owing to Covid-19 delays the ship will now be delivered to the Indian Navy in August 2023.[13]

Similarly, a second mid-life upgrade contract was awarded to the Mazagon Dock for refit and life certification of the second submarine Shankush on 30 June 2023. The completion date of mid-life upgrade and certification is 2026. The total estimated cost to be around 2,725 crore (US$320 million).[14]

Total three ships out of four will undergo mid-life refit and certification, this will extend the life of the submarine by 10–15 years.[13]

One of the submarine participated in Exercise Malabar 2024 which was held from 8 to 18 October.[15]

Two of these submarines were deployed alongside INS Vikrant along with seven frontline warships and four submarines (Kalvari class and Sindhughosh class) on 7 November 2024. The operations included carrier operations of MiG-29K, missile firing drills, submarine manoeuvres and flypasts by 30 aircraft demonstrated to the President of India Droupadi Murmu who was present on board INS Vikrant.[16][17][18]

Ships of the class

Name Pennant Builder Laid down Launched Commissioned Upgrade Note
 Indian Navy
Shishumar S44 Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft 1 May 1982 13 December 1984 22 September 1986 2018 — 2023[11][13] [2]
Shankush S45 1 September 1982 11 May 1984 20 November 1986 2023 — 2026[14] [2]
Shalki S46 Mazagon Dock 5 June 1984 30 September 1989 7 February 1992 [2]
Shankul S47 3 September 1989 21 March 1992 28 May 1994 [2]

Commissions received during the order

In a July 2005 interview with NDTV, V. P. Singh said that in 1987, while he was a minister, he had received a telegram from the Indian ambassador in Germany with the information that Indian agents had received large illegal commissions in the HDW submarine deal.[19] Singh informed the then prime minister Rajiv Gandhi about this and instituted an enquiry. Subsequently, this led to differences and Singh decided to resign from the cabinet.[20]

See also

References

  1. ^ "The Greek submarine scandal and HDW". www.sites.tufts.edu. World peace foundation. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Commodore Stephen Saunders, ed. (2004). "India". Jane's Fighting Ships 2004-2005 (107th ed.). Coulsdon: Jane's Information Group. p. 305. ISBN 978-0710626233.
  3. ^ a b Gady, Franz-Stefan (14 July 2016). "Germany to Upgrade Two Indian Attack Submarines". The Diplomat.
  4. ^ The Indian Strategic Nuclear Submarine Project An Open Literature Analysis
  5. ^ Nair-Ghaswalla, Amrita (2 December 2015). "ThyssenKrupp bullish on defence sector". The Hindu Business Line.
  6. ^ ARG. "Shishumar class - Patrol submarine". Archived from the original on 27 January 2009. Retrieved 4 January 2009.
  7. ^ "Shishumar Class".
  8. ^ "Indian Naval Squadrons – Indian Navy". Retrieved 15 November 2024.
  9. ^ a b c d e f "HDW submarine deal assumes centre stage again. An exclusive inside story". India Today. 15 March 1990. Archived from the original on 3 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2025.
  10. ^ a b c d e f "The Scandal Surfaces" (PDF). indiatoday. 15 March 1990. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 June 2025. Retrieved 23 June 2025.
  11. ^ a b c "Germany's Thyssenkrupp to refit Indian Navy submarine INS Shishumar". 26 September 2018. Retrieved 27 September 2018.
  12. ^ "India's Mazagon Dock, Germany's Thyssenkrupp Bag $151M Worth Indian Navy Submarines Refit Contract". DefenseWorld.net. 27 September 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2019.
  13. ^ a b c Peri, Dinaker (1 July 2023). "Submarine INS Shankush to undergo life extension at MDL under ₹2,725-crore contract". The Hindu.
  14. ^ a b "MoD signs a contract of Rs. 2725 Cr with Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd for Medium Refit with Life Certification of Submarine INS Shankush". PIB (Press release). 30 June 2023.
  15. ^ "CLOSING CEREMONY OF MALABAR 2024". Press Information Bureau. 18 October 2024. Retrieved 19 October 2024.
  16. ^ "President Droupadi Murmu witnesses Indian Navy operations onboard INS Vikrant". The Times of India. 7 November 2024. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 8 November 2024.
  17. ^ "President Murmu witnesses Indian Navy's demonstration on INS Vikrant". India Today. 8 November 2024. Retrieved 8 November 2024.
  18. ^ @ANI (7 November 2024). "Indian Navy today showcased six of its conventional submarines at the capability demonstration to President Draupadi Murmu during her visit to the aircraft carrier INS Vikrant at sea..." (Tweet). Retrieved 8 November 2024 – via Twitter.
  19. ^ Gupta, Shekhar (1 July 2005). "Walk the talk - an interview with V.P.Singh". NDTV. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  20. ^ "India charges 6 over submarine kickbacks". New York Times. 7 March 1990. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya