Template talk:Gov-stub

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Stub sorting This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting Politics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

Could a more neutral image than the US capitol building be used for government stubs? A very large number of such stubs are completely non-US related...

Why don't we use an image that is actually visible instead? I've gone ahead and been bold in adding the UN emblem instead. - Kookykman|(t)e 23:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the UN logo is not so neutral. Some governments see the current UN siding with the US and is "out to get them". Can we get a pic that says government without it being an organization logo or a landmark? Besides, isn't the use of united nations logo restricted? use of the emblem is restricted~ Feureau 13:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further to Feureau's comments, the UN really isn't a government, it's an organisation composed of nations themselves. I think US capitol is the most recognisable governmental building and would move for its reinstatement. I would certainly prefer another icon but I can't think of one. mjec 12:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See {{US-gov-stub}} for US Gov't stub (which is what I was looking for when I found this one) — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 11:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In your definition of the Pensions Ombudsman, you have listed the Deputy Pensions Ombudsman as Charlie Gordon. This is incorrect. The current Deputy Pensions Ombudsman is Jane Irvine.

NWinn14 (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. →Στc. 06:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]