Template talk:St Helens and Runcorn Gap Railway

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK Trains Portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Associated projects or task forces: /  This template is supported by WikiProject UK Railways.

I have renamed Ditton station as Ditton Junction as this was the name of the station for most of its life until closure in 1994. Although the station at Widnes Central could have been called Widnes Ditton because of its location at the Ditton end of the town, several sources (OS, Sub Brit etc.) verfy that this is not the same station. Britmax (talk) 20:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the branch to Edge Hill was opened by the St Helens railway not the LNWR. See Allerton Station on disused.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 23:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a problem on my system but some reverted my revert claiming it was a problem with BSRow. Anyone else got the same problem.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 17:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the template with these configurations:

	Chrome	Explorer	Foxfire	Safari
Windows 7	Y	Y	Y	Y
Mac OS X	—	—	Y	Y

and it displays correctly in all instances. What configuration are you using, and have you purged the page? Useddenim (talk) 23:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm running Firefox with my preferences set to Cologne and I get this

. When I switched to Classic it is less pronounced in that the gaps are smaller but it is still wrong.I have told it to reload the page.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 00:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Found the "?action=purge" stuff made no difference.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 00:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It works with Vector the default. It also works with some others including Modern, however it fales with Cologn Blue and some of the others.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 00:23, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the theme is specifying a default font size that is too large to fit comfortably with the x20x px icon size that the RDTs use. Do you experience the same problem with the 30px icons that wp.nl use for their diagrams? Useddenim (talk) 01:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No it seems to onlt be when a line is split.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 23:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry do you mean Dutch WIkiPedia. Not having a good day recovering from Migraine, world now soft and fussy at the edges.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 00:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See for example the infobox at nl:Spoorlijn Amsterdam - Rotterdam where the RDT has icons 30px high (as defined at nl:Sjabloon:SP-Iconbreedte), compared to the English Wikipedia setting of 20px high. The Dutch ones are thus 1+1⁄2 times the height, giving more space for multi-line text: see the rather cluttered bit on RDT rows 20-22, where there are three consecutive rows with split text ("Amsterdam Sloterdijk metrolijn 50", "Amsterdam Sloterdijk lijn naar Schiphol", "Amsterdam Sloterdijk Hemboog"). --Redrose64 (talk) 23:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have set my Voorkeuren up in the same way as en and get.

--Kitchen Knife (talk) 23:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone is looking at the image please say. Some idiot is trying to get it deleated as useless.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 00:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]