Establish relationships between homology and cohomology theories
In algebraic topology, universal coefficient theorems establish relationships between homology groups (or cohomology groups) with different coefficients. For instance, for every topological space X, its integral homology groups:

completely determine its homology groups with coefficients in A, for any abelian group A:

Here
might be the simplicial homology, or more generally the singular homology. The usual proof of this result is a pure piece of homological algebra about chain complexes of free abelian groups. The form of the result is that other coefficients A may be used, at the cost of using a Tor functor.
For example, it is common to take
to be
, so that coefficients are modulo 2. This becomes straightforward in the absence of 2-torsion in the homology. Quite generally, the result indicates the relationship that holds between the Betti numbers
of
and the Betti numbers
with coefficients in a field
. These can differ, but only when the characteristic of
is a prime number
for which there is some
-torsion in the homology.
Statement of the homology case
Consider the tensor product of modules
. The theorem states there is a short exact sequence involving the Tor functor

Furthermore, this sequence splits, though not naturally. Here
is the map induced by the bilinear map
.
If the coefficient ring
is
, this is a special case of the Bockstein spectral sequence.
Universal coefficient theorem for cohomology
Let
be a module over a principal ideal domain
(for example
, or any field.)
There is a universal coefficient theorem for cohomology involving the Ext functor, which asserts that there is a natural short exact sequence

As in the homology case, the sequence splits, though not naturally. In fact, suppose

and define

Then
above is the canonical map:
![{\displaystyle h([f])([x])=f(x).}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/f164abcf136148c7617c1fa33724d5d15f84e34a)
An alternative point of view can be based on representing cohomology via Eilenberg–MacLane space, where the map
takes a homotopy class of maps
to the corresponding homomorphism induced in homology. Thus, the Eilenberg–MacLane space is a weak right adjoint to the homology functor.[1]
Example: mod 2 cohomology of the real projective space
Let
, the real projective space. We compute the singular cohomology of
with coefficients in
using integral homology, i.e.,
.
Knowing that the integer homology is given by:

We have
and
, so that the above exact sequences yield

for all
. In fact the total cohomology ring structure is
![{\displaystyle H^{*}(X;G)=G[w]/\left\langle w^{n+1}\right\rangle .}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/6bf43418ab8e91b974947fdf5b9ddc0b642c6942)
Corollaries
A special case of the theorem is computing integral cohomology. For a finite CW complex
,
is finitely generated, and so we have the following decomposition.

where
are the Betti numbers of
and
is the torsion part of
. One may check that

and

This gives the following statement for integral cohomology:

For
an orientable, closed, and connected
-manifold, this corollary coupled with Poincaré duality gives that
.
Universal coefficient spectral sequence
There is a generalization of the universal coefficient theorem for (co)homology with twisted coefficients.
For cohomology we have

where
is a ring with unit,
is a chain complex of free modules over
,
is any
-bimodule for some ring with a unit
, and
is the Ext group. The differential
has degree
.
Similarly for homology,

for
the Tor group and the differential
having degree
.
Notes
References
External links