User talk:Auspex1729

I apologize for referring to your motivation as the nominator in some of the ongoing afds, but I think it fair because you yourself are explicit about it on your user page. I would not have mentioned it otherwise. That I totally oppose your views that in popular culture sections and articles on scientific concepts are inappropriate will be evident by now, and i do not apologize for that; it's a long held and basic view of mine about the proper content of Wikipedia --you can see an archive of my previous talk on the subject at my topical archive, & see my opinions at every recent ipc AfD. With respect to the sections I have restored, (not all--some of the instances you found were indeed trivial) I remind you that WP:BRD requires as the next step discussion and consensus for their removal. DGG (talk) 04:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Get bent, you malicious wanker. Auspex1729 (talk) 04:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I decided not to ask for removal of this, for it illustrates the problem nicely. DGG (talk) 02:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Auspex1729's comment is uncivil. Bearian (talk) 16:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're on the right track. Mintrick (talk) 00:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Insults and all? DGG (talk) 02:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not. Most of his edits are/were good, and everyone has the occasional outburst. Mintrick (talk) 02:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, although we disagree on the margins, I hope you come back and work on deleting the real cruft. Bearian (talk) 16:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page WellPoint has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 19:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]