@Richie1509 We only include parties with representation in parliament in the infobox, so they would have to win a by-election or have an existing MP defect. This is to avoid WP:CRYSTAL issues. Hope this helps! CR (how's my driving? call 0865 88318) 19:48, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've been reverting the IP editor's deletions/insertions as vandalism, and documenting them on the article's talk page. I also requested page protection since the IP editor seemed to be escalating the situation through edit summaries. Since you posted a 3RR warning on the IP's talk page, I was wondering if I should stop reverting as well, and let other editors handle it. I've always tried to be very conscientious about not violating the 3RR myself, though I'm not sure whether it applies to me in this instance. Since the warning mentioned an "edit war", I thought I should check with you before any more reversions (should they become necessary). P Aculeius (talk) 14:23, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@P Aculeius I'm not 100% on how clearly this falls on either side of the reverting obvious vandalism line - I would avoid reverting as I don't think this falls under obvious vandalism, personally, but at the end of the day it's your call. CR (how's my driving? call 0865 88318) 14:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your quick reply. The IP editor actually followed through on his/her threat to report me for 3RR, and I have replied there. For now, I'll step back from reverting at RID and let other editors handle it. P Aculeius (talk) 14:35, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, ANI and a lot of technical procedures are pretty confusing if you aren't used to them. I try to avoid getting involved there at all! I found the report quickly because the IP did at least notify me. I still think the report is frivolous, but don't really care that the notice wasn't very good. P Aculeius (talk) 14:41, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Independent Oxford Alliance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, CipherRephic!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!04:00, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]