User talk:Code-AnalysisCode-Analysis, you are invited to the Teahouse
Deletion discussion about C++ grammarHello, Code-Analysis, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether C++ grammar should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C++ grammar . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks, TheChampionMan1234 09:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC) C++ grammar suggestionHey there Code-Analysis and thanks for your enthusiasm towards creating pages on topics which you're passionate about here on Wikipedia. It appears that you may have left the sources for your article C++ grammar in the sandbox. The primary reason people are !voting delete at the AfD discussion is that it's unsourced. If you can even copy-paste the refs into your external links section, I or someone else can help you format them. Thanks, and feel free to contact me on my talk page should you have any questions. Thanks--Go Phightins! 04:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC) Edit summaries
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia