User talk:CptViraj/Archives/2019/August

This is an archive of past discussions with User:CptViraj. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thanks for creating No.1 Dilwala.

User:Rosguill while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

When creating these redirects for alternate names of Indian films, it would be helpful if you could also add some mention of the alternate title to the target article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Administrator changes Johnuniq • Kosack • Valereee Ad Orientem • Ched • Gadfium • Jonathunder • Nick • Yelyos Bald Zebra • Beetstra • Doug Bell • Journalist • Ruud Koot • Splash • Voice of Clam Interface administrator changes Dinoguy1000

CheckUser changes RickinBaltimore Oversight changes Beeblebrox RickinBaltimore

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, the page Wikipedia:Office actions has been changed from a policy page to an information page.
• A request for comment (permalink) is in progress regarding the administrator inactivity policy.

Arbitration

• Editors may now use the template {{Ds/aware}} to indicate that they are aware that discretionary sanctions are in force for a topic area, so it is unnecessary to alert them.

Miscellaneous

• Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
• The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

  Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.

Hi, yes i am refering to Rupali Suri Page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjunsingh5478 (talk • contribs)

Fuck off idiot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.251.118.132 (talk • contribs)

Hi Thanks, for sharing the info. Can i start with the writing of the article with the information i have with me.--Arjunsingh5478 (talk) 08:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Arjunsingh5478: Please read WP:GNG. Thanks! -- CptViraj (📧) 08:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Greetings! Here is the 7th issue of the Bots Newsletter, a lot happened since last year's newsletter! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: ARBCOM Nothing of note happened. Just like we like it. BAG Several (1 + 12 = 13) users have been retired/resigned from the BAG due to inactivity, per our new activity requirements (discussion). BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG. Two BAG members retired Madman (talk · contribs) retired. BU Rob13 (talk · contribs) vanished and retired. Three new BAG members have been voted in, welcome to the BAG! Primefac (talk · contribs) joined on 2018-12-12 (RfBAG). Primefac operates PrimeBOT (talk · contribs) which does a plethora of tasks. TheSandDoctor (talk · contribs) joined on 2019-01-21 (RfBAG). TheSandDoctor operates several bots including DeprecatedFixerBot (talk · contribs). Enterprisey (talk · contribs) joined on 2019-08-07 (RfBAG). Enterprisey operates EnterpriseyBot (talk · contribs), which does a plethora of tasks, RemindMeBot (talk · contribs) which posts reminders, and codes several scripts. We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary. BOTDICT Two new entries feature in the bots dictionary Editor-hostile wikitext – describes wikitext structuring that is editor hostile, even if it renders correctly Spectrum of usefulness – describes how tasks are deemed useful or not BOTPOL Activity requirements: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC). Copyvio flag: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion). There is currently 1 bot using this functionality. Mass creation: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from articles, to all content-pages. There are subtleties, but content here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION. BOTREQs and BRFAs As of writing, we have... 20 active BOTREQs, please help if you can! 14 open BRFAs and 1 BRFA in need of BAG attention (see live status). In 2018, 96 bot task were approved. An AWB search shows approximately 29 were withdrawn/expired, and 6 were denied. Since the start of 2019, 97 bot task were approved. Logs show 15 were withdrawn/expired, and 15 were denied. 10 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). 5 other bots have been deflagged per operator requests or similar (see discussion). New things All bot-related discussion pages now have a centralized and searchable archive box (see discussion). Discussions are searchable per noticeboard, or globally. {{Bot}} now supports |status=expired (see discussion). This led to the deletion of Category:Indefinitely blocked Wikipedia bots as useless (see discussion). WP:BOTREQ now mentions WP:SCRIPTREQ and WP:AWBTASKS as alternatives to bot requests. The bot creation guide now mentions bot flags, and two new languages Awk and MATLAB. Other minor tweaks have been made. AAlertBot has received major code updates. In particular, WP:AALERTS will now report splits, mergers, and AFC submissions. Citation bot has received several updates (User talk:Citation bot/Archive 10/11/12/13/14/15/16/17). In particular, the bot stopped the automated removal of |publisher= from {{cite journal}}, and stopped the automated addition of CiteSeerX links, and now uses OAuth to authenticate those who make requests of the bot. Other discussions These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last Bots Newsletter. Many are stale, but some are still active. Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Adminbots requests page Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Double-redirect tagging (2019) Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Long and Winding Road to Parsoid Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 13#Bot-like user scripts Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 13#WP:URLREQ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 13#Wikipedia:Bots/Status Wikipedia talk:Bot Approvals Group#Minimum edits Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Minor update to WP:BOTISSUE Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Semi-automated Portal creation Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Clarification on "Bots operated by multiple users" Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Bots triggered by multiple users Wikipedia talk:Bots#How to use Special:ApiFeatureUsage See also the latest discussions at the bot noticeboard. Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 17:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC) (You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Dear Mr Viraj

Thank you for reviewing our page.

In our user page we decided to give more information on what we do in order to provide all the information of our work. Which we included some external links.

But after your comments we have realised that we might have made a mistaken in adding all these information.

We have modified our user page removing any external links and product information. We only left the founded by information and our expertise information available. We also removed any contact information which was in the page.

Our goal is to provide wikipedia with more accurate information on 3D printing and 3D technology but not promotion. Therefore we apologise for any violation on terms and conditions and would appreciate if you give us the chance to proceed in contributing as a valued member. And we do appreciate the guidance you could provide in the future as well.

Therefore would appreciate if you could remove the TAG. speedy Deletion and allow us to continue with wikipedia.

Thank You Kind Reagds LAB 3D Team — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lab3d-sagl (talk • contribs) 8:53, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi, you nominated Draft:Dj Zoomer for a G13 speedy delete. However I had already removed a G13 tag about an hour before, after restoring the page. Please check more carefully before nominating these for speedy delete. The history and logs will reveal what happened to the page in the past. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:34, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett: My apologize, Thanks for the note! -- CptViraj (📧) 08:36, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Leja Re Cover Art.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello CptViraj,

You had flagged and declined the article Kandiyohi County Historical Society for having copied and pasted text from another location. I have looked over but am unable to find any copying or paraphrasing in the article, could you please expand on which part of the article is copied from http://www.kandiyohicountyhistory.com/museum%20and%20depot.html and needs to be corrected?

Thanks

Myotus (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

@Myotus: as per copyvio detecter - The Kandiyohi County Historical Society (KCHS) was incorporated in 1940 under its current name, but was founded as the Old Settlers Association in 1897. KCHS was specifically incorporated to “discover, preserve and share the story of Kandiyohi County and its people. -- CptViraj (📧) 15:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. The copyvio detecter says "Violation Unlikely" and a portion is quoted text from a mission statement. However, I will contact @Silvernerve: and ask them to make modifications. Myotus (talk) 15:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

@Myotus: as I've flagged article, a admin or experienced user will shortly remove the copyrighted material and revdel the copyrighted revisions. Also note that draft needs more sources to demonstrate notablity. -- CptViraj (📧) 16:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

The article is a stub, while not robust it more than demonstrates notability of a historical organization and certainly more has notability and information/citations than many of the articles on county historical societies. What is lacking in the notability of the article?

• Washington County Historical Society (Utah)
• Carleton County Historical Society
• Historical Society of Central Florida
• Douglas County Historical Society
• Taylor County Historical Society — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myotus (talk • contribs) 17:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

@Myotus: These articles aren't published through AfC and were created few years ago, policies were different at that time. If you still think that draft meets notablity then please resubmit. Another AfC reviewer will review the draft next time. Thanks! -- CptViraj (📧) 17:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I do get that times have changed, but again, What is lacking in the notability of the article? Myotus (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

To CptViraj, Quotes are not copyright violations if attributed. You should not rely on machine copyright detector. Do not leave copyrighted materials and do not just tag the article. You should remove copyrighted material and then tag the article with CV Revdel tag if the violation is critical. Masum Reza^📞 17:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I see no copyvio. As there are sources and the subject is notable, I've moved it to article space. Jonathunder (talk) 19:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. Masum Reza^📞 17:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kya Baat Ay Cover Art.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi CptViraj! You created a thread called Google Books at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello --CptViraj

I have edited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nathalie_Palladitcheff to add reliable sources and take off the sentence you flagged as copyright violation.

Please can you review it again?

thank you for your help! --Zegilbos (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi CptViraj! You created a thread called Draft:Move Burn (Hamilton song) at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Tere Te.

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the song "Tere Te".

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:08, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you -- CptViraj (📧) 01:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

• Jlhcpa (talk · contribs)
  • 2019 Saint Francis Cougars football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:2019 Saint Francis Cougars football team (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

OK, I am really confused. This is a 2019 season article about a NAIA football program that has existed for over 20 years. The article is substantially the same as articles published and relating to prior football seasons. There are 3 citations givien within the article, each of which point back to the official website of the team being published. If team pages are not deemed authoritative, then what must it take to satisfy this reviewer? Furthermore, various other facts, such as tenure of the various coaches, is contained within the 3 cites mentioned, even though a cite notation has not been afixed to each other fact mentioned.

The article presents a game summary template for the upcoming first game of the season. Little else is presented because the game has not yet been played. Summary information will be added for this and all other games once each respective game has been played.

The article presents the 2019 season schedule. Why would I want to source anything OTHER than the official team website? The article contains a WIKIlink to a graphic of the league standings for the MSFA, the association of teams this team plays against. This graphic is used throughout Wikipedia by the MSFA and its various member teams. What cite is needed here? It is a Wikipedia creation.

Similarly, a recap of standings in the national polls currently has only one entry because the preseason poll is the only one that has been released as of this moment. As future polls are released, the weekly poll movements will be added here.

In summary, I believe the information presented in this article has been adequately documented with appropriate sourcing; the major elements of the article come from elsewhere in Wikipedia or they can easily be verified by the official team websites which have been referenced. I do not understand why you choose to withhold publishing of this article.

Please be specific about areas you deem insufficiently sourced, and I will focus on modifying the article to satisfy your review expectations. Jlhcpa (talk) 18:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hii, thank you for your submission. Team's own website isn't a reliable source. Please add third party sources. Thanks! -- CptViraj (📧) 01:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, CptViraj,

Thanks for creating Dheeme Dheeme (song)! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on the song "Dheeme Dheeme". But please read WP:NSONG, as more evidence of the song's notability is needed, beyond going viral on YouTube.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Hii, thank you for reviewing the article. -- CptViraj (📧) 01:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:High Rated Gabru - Cover Art.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:High Rated Gabru (Nawabzaade) - Cover Art.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, CptViraj,

Thanks for creating Kaushiki (web series)! I edit here too, under the username Domdeparis and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

a lot of rehashed press releases for trailers etc and very little after it came out

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Domdeparis}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dom from Paris (talk) 09:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

I hate to bother you, but I would like to discuss the recent declining of this draft. The cited reason was due to a lack of significant coverage of this device, but both the sources and a simple Google search will prove otherwise. With that said, I have made some minor edits and added even more sources in an effort to improve the article. While I may not agree with your assessment of said article, I do recognize that it is still a stub and lacks some aspects that would help to classify it as a full article. So, my question is, how would/should I go about improving this article to a point where it could be accepted into the mainspace? Thank you in advance for reading through this jumbled block of a paragraph and your suggestions would be much appreciated. InternetProtocol127001 (talk) 18:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

@InternetProtocol127001: Hii, since you've added more information and references i think draft is ready (stub class). You can resubmit if you want to. Thanks and please feel free to leave a message on my talkpage. -- CptViraj (📧) 15:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

@CptViraj: Alright, it has been resubmitted, thank you for your consideration. I am still going to try to expand the information even if it remains a stub, so if you have any suggestions for the type of content that should be added, feel free to add it or suggest it on the article's talk page. InternetProtocol127001 (talk) 15:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Dear CptViraj,

Hi, I am creating a website for this person and I am not related to him in any sense. Since he has done some noteworthy work, I thought he deserves to be here. I have added more references from Google Books and other places. Do you think it is good to go now?

Yours truly, — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeWiPl (talk • contribs) 16:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello-

In regards to the article being rejected based on lack of external reliable sources, is there a number of sources that would a goal to shoot for, or just depending on the quality of the sources?

thanks for your help/feedback

MichaelEMaly — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelEMaly (talk • contribs) 16:47, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

@MichaelEMaly: Hii, as per WP:ORGIN : Wikipedia bases its decision about whether an organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the organization or product. Notability requires only that these necessary sources have been published—even if these sources are not actually listed in the article yet (though in most cases it probably would improve the article to add them). For more information please read WP:NCORP. Thanks, Happy Editing. -- CptViraj (📧) 16:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)