User talk:D1551D3N7

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

FortunateSons (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Can you find atleast three media outlets that have covered this event ?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Cybersecurity Challenge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 09:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D1551D3N7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sohom (talk) 09:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

European Cybersecurity Challenge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sohom (talk) 15:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D1551D3N7

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Викидим, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ac1db1tch3z, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Викидим}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Викидим (talk) 01:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are worried about Vandalism of Hydra Market. which suggests you might have had some sort of involvement with that Darknet Market which is now closed.

I note my Wikipedia discloses a lot where as yours reads like a supporter of Putin. it even has a warning on your profile. Xuid0 (talk) 01:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

🤣🤣🤣 D1551D3N7 (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I don't think that's an AI-generated conversation. I think it is fairly typical hagiography for that page and comes from someone who, if I had to guess from the editing history, has a very substantial undeclared COI. Wouldn't astonish me to learn that some or all of the sockpuppets who have edited that page over the years did so from that IP. Brammarb (talk) 21:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very confident that specific message is AI generated. Most of the online AI text detection tools give it almost 100%. It's lifting text from this page: https://drpatricktreacy.ie/pages/books and other search results. It's even taking "Prof." from his website when surely a normal commenter would use "Dr." D1551D3N7 (talk) 22:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly not a normal commenter: we can agree on that much. Brammarb (talk) 22:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D1551D3N7, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 23:11, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not really sure where this notice is coming from. I only have one account and don't coordinate my edits with people outside of Wikipedia.

EDIT: ah this was from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Polyquest, I have responded there.D1551D3N7 (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To some of us that Wikipedia is not as much of a genealogical resource as it could be is nothing to celebrate...just an area for improvement.72.80.84.163 (talk) 22:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not supposed to be a genealogical resource. WP:NOTGENEALOGY D1551D3N7 (talk) 23:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Jazz Wolf. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and in particular, the article needs at least one and preferably two more reliable independent sources with significant coverage of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm curious why you removed Jason Healey from Category:People associated with computer security? He is a professor of that topic, helps organize one of the tracks at DEF CON, and has several decades of operational experience at the White House, Goldman Sachs, and the USAF. Thanks, Bill Woodcock (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

He is in Category:Writers about computer security which is a subcategory of Category:People associated with computer security.

People associated with computer security is a diffuse category (WP:DIFFUSE) and if you read the infobox on the category page it states "Pages in this category should be moved to subcategories where applicable. This category may require frequent maintenance to avoid becoming too large. It should directly contain very few, if any, pages and should mainly contain subcategories.".

Hopefully this answers your question! D1551D3N7 (talk) 14:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks! Bill Woodcock (talk) 14:47, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksanteri Kivimäki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:53, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]