This is an archive of past discussions with User:Fowler&fowler. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Where exactly (or likely) at the Hindu kush did the Indo-Aryans enter India? Did they follow the Balkh-river upstream, through what is now Bamiyan, Charikar, Jalalabad, Kabul, and then the Khyber pass? With other words, wasn't the Kabul-Kandahar line the most likely western border of the Maurya empire, effectively guarding the entrance to India? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!17:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Cheetah reintroduction in India
Hi! You have been blindly reverting the edits on Cheetah reintroduction in India after multiple weeks of inactivity on the pretext of WP:ONUS. If you had actually taken time to go through the edits, it would be more clearer of what has actually been changed. What I have done is to move the citations to the body of the article as per WP:LEDE. The points in the lede essentially remains the same apart from minor tense/sentence corrections.
What you have been doing is add all the duplicate citations back to the lede, and add an additional unwanted clutter of images. So, it would be great if you can actually discuss or point out, what exactly your point of contention is, as I do not see any major points of contention here as such from the version you keep on reverting to. Thanks! M2 (talk) 07:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I wrote the lead that had been in place for quite some time. I did read through your changes. Please take to the talk page. Your edit has too many inaccuracies. Like I said, the WP:ONUS is yours.
Please don't talk to me in edit summaries and then engage in edit warring. If you do it again I will post on the user talk pages of administrators. Fowler&fowler«Talk»13:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Please take this discussion to the article's talk page. Slapping a big flag on a talk page has no value on Wikipedia. Find scholarly sources that support the notion that the British Raj had a flag. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk»01:15, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello Fowler&fowler, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing,
— Benison (Beni · talk) 18:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Dear User:Fowler&fowler, thank you for your kind Seasons Greetings wishes. I hope that you have a Merry Christmas and a most joyous New Year! With regards, AnupamTalk19:31, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
LukeEmily (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for the nod! The photo was taken in 2008, so the kids are now c. 25 yo. I wonder how they have got on. Happy holidays to all (again), Johnbod (talk) 16:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Just to clarify, the image you reverted is not of the oldest missionary school in Baramulla. It is baramulla public school a private local school. The oldest missionary institution is St. Joseph School. Looking forward to your thoughts. Aliyiya5903 (talk) 16:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Harrapan sites located in modern day India have an India portal, I just added Pakistan portal on sites in modern day Pakistan for the sake of uniformity. If you believe it is unnecessary (which I absolutely agree with) you must equally remove the portals from ivc sites in modern india as well otherwise it will be unequal and highly biased. Qaiser-i-Mashriq (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Which ones are these? Please let me know. Pakistan, of course, has the major ones, the ones that brought IVC into the world's limelight 100 years ago. Fowler&fowler«Talk»15:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
I have reverted one of your reverts. We can't go against WP policy. That is nonnegotiable, Indian sites or no Indian. Please self revert the others. Fowler&fowler«Talk»15:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Please do not be intentionally ignorant or threaten me with penalties, extremely unprofessional for a guy who's been on wiki for almost 20 years (very impressive btw) Qaiser-i-Mashriq (talk) 19:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Rakhigarhi and kalibangan do have India portal on see also and dholavira has on references, please cooperate otherwise I will not revert neither let you revert the Pakistan portals Qaiser-i-Mashriq (talk) 19:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
It seems to me that Qaiser-i-Mashriq has a point: either country-portals should be included at both Indian and Pakistani sites, or no portals should be included equally. NB: I'm not a fan of portals. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!20:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
That thread has been closed with an admonition from Cullen*:NitinMlk, are you actually arguing that a concession about a "happy medium" in wording that an editor made in July, 2022 is somehow binding in January, 2025? Surely you are aware that our consensus policy makes it quite clear that consensus can change. I presume that you are also aware that bickering about South Asian castes is highly problematic and administrators have little patience for such disruption. So please be cautious when editing in this topic area.
That concession was born of distaste for continuing on in a discussion that was mired in what Johnuniq, another admin, informed me about later had the hallmarks of WP:Civil POV pushing, though they did not say anything about this particular caste article. It took place before the enforced rest during COVID gave the sociologists, social anthropologists, and historians of India the time to produce a spate of new scholarly works. Fowler&fowler«Talk»11:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Bad article
Sir your work on articles from India is greatly appreciated and it's amazing including the map collection; you may know from this thread. Now i came a cross the article for serfoji II, and found that it's very badly written with a trivially low amount of sources. I am now working on a draft here. your inputs or contribution will greatly be appreciated. Thank you sir ☢️SCR@TCH!NGH3@D (talk) 12:19, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 49.204.142.89. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jats have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. “Somewhere, you made a big mistake, and I think you should take a look at Nitin Malik’s archive at Jats he clearly explained the tonning of non elites tilers at extended confirmed summary,
where he clearly restated that ‘non-elite’ is not an appropriate word for the Jats used in the leading of the section
. As a result, those fabricated statements are now being repeated. I suggest that this be corrected as soon as possible; otherwise, it can still be done later, but nothing can change the reality.”, as you did at Jats. 49.204.142.89 (talk) 16:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
I hope all is as well as it can be in your family life, first of all. Secondly, if it is trivial to do so, I've realized I operate best in these collaborations when I'm assigned some specific tasks. So, if there is anything specific with India you know should be done but (obviously) do not have the time for, maybe let me know? I wanted to make up for my clumsinesses until this point anyway. Hope you are well. Remsense ‥ 论00:29, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello Remsense, Unfortunately, I won't be able to take part in the IndiaWP:FAR. I have to seriously take time off WP and will change my WikiBreak, which currently says, "generally," up top. Please get in touch with Vanamonde and CMD. Together, they should be able to steer India through the FAR. The page may not even need a formal FAR, if enough progress is made. I will post on the Talk:India page as well. Fowler&fowler«Talk»01:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your work on-wiki, I hope things in your personal life go as easy or positive as they can go. Remsense ‥ 论16:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Himalayas
Hi! I am reaching out to you regarding your revert on Himalayas. While I understand that WP:Tertiary sources are not preferred, it was undue for you to do a wholesale revert of the changes without going into what has happened in detail, simply months after multiple intermediate edits by various editors.
You have restored an old version which still uses the same Britannica as the major source, so what justifies the usage here? Practice what you preach?
In the old text restored by you, large swathes are uncited text such as the entire section on Geography. Unless you have reliable sources backing up, I do not find a valid reason for you to restore them into the article.
Your claim of me doing away with the original sources in the article is unfounded. I have preserved all the properly cited sections with the respective resources. Unless you can quote those "dozen scholarly sources", this is nothing but speculation.
I do agree that certain sections depend heavily on tertiary sources. If you have specific objections to certain sections that were added on, I will be happy to discuss in detail and work on finding relevant secondary sources.
So instead of coming after multiple months and simply undoing a wholesale revert of all the intermediate edits to an already problematic version, it would be in the good if you can discuss first as you had preached. M2 (talk) 06:34, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
@Fowler&fowler, You are consistently reverting edits without explaining any of the points. You seem to be hell bent on keeping the old version. I have extensively added information and added citations as most of the sections does not have proper citations. If it helps, I will start going section by section with the summary. Request you to engage in a conversation rather than doing blind reverts which are not helpful. M2 (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
I note the comment on your user page, and hope all is as well as it can be with you.
I have put Bishop Creighton up for FAC, and you are, of course, welcome to take part in the discussion on the FAC page, but if not I'm entirely happy to see him through - I hope - on my own. Very best wishes, TR. Tim riley talk17:49, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Thank you very much, Tim, both for the wishes and for doing this. Much as I'd like to, I doubt I'll be able to take part in the discussion. It is a difficult time right now, a somber business. I'll leave a brief note at FAC. Fowler&fowler«Talk»19:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Also, Tim, I wanted to say that nothing I wrote in MC, some of it a very long time ago, is sacrosanct, unamenable to change. If you or someone else at FAC you feel can improve what I had written (the coherence, cohesion, idiom, style, or what have you), please feel free to change it. We want everything that will make MC a first-rate FA. Fowler&fowler«Talk»18:23, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for that, and I'll tinker as needed. All the same, I'd be happier keeping as much of your original material as I can. Best wishes, Tim riley talk18:25, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
A warning?
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
Promoted to Featured Article just now. I send you my warmest congratulations and my equally warm thanks for your encouragement. I also send my best wishes for your real-life concerns. Yours most truly, Tim. talk22:56, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Congratulations, Fowler&fowler! The article you nominated, Mandell Creighton, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Best not to keep an eye on the editor's edits at the moment, especially to pages that have a ton of other page-watchers who can dispute their edits if needed, just so that the editor is not left with a misapprehension that the push-back and reverts are personal. Abecedare (talk) 04:33, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
I blocked them from Benares State but hadn't seen the delightful comment above. Will change the block. If you can, remind me to reinstate the page block after the site block expires. RegentsPark (comment) 15:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Man from satrapy of "Hindush" (Indus) is being displayed in "history of India" article as "Indian warrior" under "Magadha Section" I stopped editing after talking to you a while back because you seem much more experienced in wiki editing than me, so now I came here to ask this, should I/you go and remove that image wrongfully claiming man from Indus as "indian warrior" while talking about eastern india (Magadha)? Qaiser-i-Mashriq (talk) 20:33, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your post. I only very vaguely remember reading about this riot, and have no memory of the FAC. This is often the case with me. I take your word for the improvement and wish the author(s) well. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk»19:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the offer, but I'm dealing with an unexpected personal loss. FACs are far away right now in the scheme of things. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk»02:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
I apologize for that. I thought an edit summary pop-up would appear, but it did not. This issue has appeared on this page many times. What you proposed to change is the consensus in WP:SCHOLARSHIP of due weight. You can open a discussion on the article's talk page and attempt to gather a consensus, following WP:BRD and Wikipedia policy WP:ONUS. In general, you cannot change the infobox information in old, well-worked-through, and highly trafficked articles with only overly long edit summaries. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk»11:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
I have suffered an acute and unexpected personal loss. My work on Wikipedia for the foreseeable future will be restricted to (i) reverting edits that, in my assessment, are very obviously of undue weight and (ii) content work related to British India before the Indian rebellion of 1857. If I have reverted an edit, please trust that the revert was made in good faith and with the experience of my 18-year stint on Wikipedia. Open a thread on the article's talk page and attempt to establish a consensus for your edit. I won't edit war nor will I have the time or heart for talk page discussions, but perhaps other editors will step in. Please do not express your discontent or ask for clarity on my user talk page. Please give me space. Fowler&fowler«Talk»14:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
@Joshua Jonathan: My wife was both a flower and animal lover. We have over a dozen animals in two homes. We planned to consolidate in 2026 by moving to a country house with ample space for the animals and gardening. But that, sadly, will not come to pass. It haunts me that it was so unexpected. Fowler&fowler«Talk»17:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Fowler, we've disagreed on many things, and I’ve accused you and your motives countless times. But today, I feel your pain, and I’m truly sorry this happened. This is not only heartbreaking — I have teary eyes as I write this. May her eternal soul rest in peace, wherever it is. I will also offer my prayers.
May you recover from this, stronger than before. I’ll be looking forward to arguing with you again once you return in full form.
"One day, all of us will perish — our names, our memories, everything. The only thing that will remain is our work, even if it is never recognised, or we are never recognised for it. And perhaps that’s the only solace we can find in the face of death."
Thank you Bishonen. She was always amused that I took disputes on Wikipedia so seriously. Her favorite remark if she saw me typing away furiously was, "You got busted?" Fowler&fowler«Talk»22:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, CMD. Yes, time it will take. Soon after we were married, a relative, seeing my shiny wedding ring, asked if I had had it engraved on the inside as a form of identification. I replied, "Why would I? It's never coming off." Fowler&fowler«Talk»22:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, RP. Although my wife never paid much attention to Wikipedia, everything I did here, including the decision to join in 2006, was made in her presence, or rather, with the confidence of her presence, whether near or far. Fowler&fowler«Talk»23:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm truly sorry for your loss, Fowler&fowler. Although we haven't interacted much, please know that I and other editors here deeply appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia for last 18 years, especially to the minefield of South Asian articles. Take all the time you need, and take good care of yourself. Sincerely, Sutyarashi (talk) 13:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
This reminds us all what the really important things are in life, and how little a dust-up at Wikipedia matters in the grand scheme of things. So very, very sorry at this incalculable loss, and wishing you centering and peace. Take good care of yourself, F&F, as you welcome those close to you to rally around and take good care of you as well. Best, Mathglot (talk) 18:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Friends have reached out. In particular, one who I have known for 30 years, a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, who had studied trauma (and the still officially undiagnosed PTSD) among returning Vietnam vets at Fort Hood in the mid-1960s and two or three years later—on a two-year fellowship in Bristol—among parents of children killed in the Aberfan disaster, has been calling several times a week. Many of my symptoms, the wish to leave everything unchanged, the disheveled state the bedroom when the ambulance came, the dozens of hospital parking lot receipts collected over the following two weeks and scattered on the passenger seat of car and the floor below; and the haunting by the final scene in the critical care unit three hours after I had left her laughing and joking in her hospital room, he said are not uncommon among those who have experienced trauma. Fowler&fowler«Talk»13:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Indeed. I just happened upon this. We haven't interacted in years, Fowler and Fowler, but I offer my condolences as well. Some speak of Wikipedia as distinct from "real life". But this reminds me once again that the Wikipedia community is as real as any other part of life. My heart goes out to you. Regards, Alan W (talk) 01:26, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you @Alan W: for your insight. To overcome grief, I feel, we have to marshal all our resources, and Wikipedia is very much one. I'm finding working on small, disregarded, topics to be strangely therapeutic. Fowler&fowler«Talk»16:22, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
We do what we can. As Guettarda said, you are part of a community that cares about you. Regards, Alan W (talk) 01:16, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, Alan W, for that. A physician friend of mine struck a similar note, which I am quoting in the hopes that it might help others similarly stricken: "I am encouraged that you’re engaging with folks who are well wishers ... Our collective experience tells us that eventually the distress fever will break, no matter where you are in the grief cycle." Fowler&fowler«Talk»02:43, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm so sorry to hear this Fowler. I was involved in a discussion at the VS Naipaul article, and your absence from that conversation made me wonder how you were doing. I've experienced a lot of profound (and unexpected) losses, but even I can't imagine losing my spouse. Know you're part of a community here that cares about you. Guettarda (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you @Guettarda: for your words of solace. In my youth, I had obsessively read John Bowlby's Attachment and Loss trilogy. In the third volume, he and Colin Murray Parkes' had proposed four stages of grief: numbness, yearning and searching, disorganization and despair, and reorganization. They were probably not strictly linear anyway, but no amount of reading had prepared me for this event. And no theoretical knowledge beats simple words of comfort that ease distress. I am grateful for yours. Fowler&fowler«Talk»01:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, @Fowler&fowler I am deeply saddened by your loss. I hope that with time you find strength. Although I haven't interacted with you much, I've seen some discussions you were involved in, and I must say that over the past 18 years, you have been an outstanding member of the Wikipedia community. I can relate to the challenges, as I have only been active for two years and sometimes struggle to continue.
Thank you, @Rawn3012:, for your kind words, both of condolence and appreciation. I wish you luck in your career on Wikipedia. I hope you will carve out a niche for yourself, however small. Fowler&fowler«Talk»18:24, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
My work on Wikipedia starting April 24, 2025
I have suffered an acute and unexpected personal loss. My work on Wikipedia for the foreseeable future will be restricted to (i) reverting edits that, in my assessment, are very obviously of undue weight and (ii) content work related to British India before the Indian rebellion of 1857. If I have reverted an edit, please trust that the revert was made in good faith and with the experience of my 18-year stint on Wikipedia. Open a thread on the article's talk page and attempt to establish a consensus for your edit. I won't edit war nor will I have the time or heart for talk page discussions, but perhaps other editors will step in. Please do not express your discontent or ask for clarity on my user talk page. Please give me space. Fowler&fowler«Talk»14:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
@Joshua Jonathan: My wife was both a flower and animal lover. We have over a dozen animals in two homes. We planned to consolidate in 2026 by moving to a country house with ample space for the animals and gardening. But that, sadly, will not come to pass. It haunts me that it was so unexpected. Fowler&fowler«Talk»17:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Fowler, we've disagreed on many things, and I’ve accused you and your motives countless times. But today, I feel your pain, and I’m truly sorry this happened. This is not only heartbreaking — I have teary eyes as I write this. May her eternal soul rest in peace, wherever it is. I will also offer my prayers.
May you recover from this, stronger than before. I’ll be looking forward to arguing with you again once you return in full form.
"One day, all of us will perish — our names, our memories, everything. The only thing that will remain is our work, even if it is never recognised, or we are never recognised for it. And perhaps that’s the only solace we can find in the face of death."
Thank you Bishonen. She was always amused that I took disputes on Wikipedia so seriously. Her favorite remark if she saw me typing away furiously was, "You got busted?" Fowler&fowler«Talk»22:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, CMD. Yes, time it will take. Soon after we were married, a relative, seeing my shiny wedding ring, asked if I had had it engraved on the inside as a form of identification. I replied, "Why would I? It's never coming off." Fowler&fowler«Talk»22:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, RP. Although my wife never paid much attention to Wikipedia, everything I did here, including the decision to join in 2006, was made in her presence, or rather, with the confidence of her presence, whether near or far. Fowler&fowler«Talk»23:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm truly sorry for your loss, Fowler&fowler. Although we haven't interacted much, please know that I and other editors here deeply appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia for last 18 years, especially to the minefield of South Asian articles. Take all the time you need, and take good care of yourself. Sincerely, Sutyarashi (talk) 13:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
This reminds us all what the really important things are in life, and how little a dust-up at Wikipedia matters in the grand scheme of things. So very, very sorry at this incalculable loss, and wishing you centering and peace. Take good care of yourself, F&F, as you welcome those close to you to rally around and take good care of you as well. Best, Mathglot (talk) 18:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Friends have reached out. In particular, one who I have known for 30 years, a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, who had studied trauma (and the still officially undiagnosed PTSD) among returning Vietnam vets at Fort Hood in the mid-1960s and two or three years later—on a two-year fellowship in Bristol—among parents of children killed in the Aberfan disaster, has been calling several times a week. Many of my symptoms, the wish to leave everything unchanged, the disheveled state the bedroom when the ambulance came, the dozens of hospital parking lot receipts collected over the following two weeks and scattered on the passenger seat of car and the floor below; and the haunting by the final scene in the critical care unit three hours after I had left her laughing and joking in her hospital room, he said are not uncommon among those who have experienced trauma. Fowler&fowler«Talk»13:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Indeed. I just happened upon this. We haven't interacted in years, Fowler and Fowler, but I offer my condolences as well. Some speak of Wikipedia as distinct from "real life". But this reminds me once again that the Wikipedia community is as real as any other part of life. My heart goes out to you. Regards, Alan W (talk) 01:26, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you @Alan W: for your insight. To overcome grief, I feel, we have to marshal all our resources, and Wikipedia is very much one. I'm finding working on small, disregarded, topics to be strangely therapeutic. Fowler&fowler«Talk»16:22, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
We do what we can. As Guettarda said, you are part of a community that cares about you. Regards, Alan W (talk) 01:16, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, Alan W, for that. A physician friend of mine struck a similar note, which I am quoting in the hopes that it might help others similarly stricken: "I am encouraged that you’re engaging with folks who are well wishers ... Our collective experience tells us that eventually the distress fever will break, no matter where you are in the grief cycle." Fowler&fowler«Talk»02:43, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm so sorry to hear this Fowler. I was involved in a discussion at the VS Naipaul article, and your absence from that conversation made me wonder how you were doing. I've experienced a lot of profound (and unexpected) losses, but even I can't imagine losing my spouse. Know you're part of a community here that cares about you. Guettarda (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you @Guettarda: for your words of solace. In my youth, I had obsessively read John Bowlby's Attachment and Loss trilogy. In the third volume, he and Colin Murray Parkes' had proposed four stages of grief: numbness, yearning and searching, disorganization and despair, and reorganization. They were probably not strictly linear anyway, but no amount of reading had prepared me for this event. And no theoretical knowledge beats simple words of comfort that ease distress. I am grateful for yours. Fowler&fowler«Talk»01:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, @Fowler&fowler I am deeply saddened by your loss. I hope that with time you find strength. Although I haven't interacted with you much, I've seen some discussions you were involved in, and I must say that over the past 18 years, you have been an outstanding member of the Wikipedia community. I can relate to the challenges, as I have only been active for two years and sometimes struggle to continue.
Thank you, @Rawn3012:, for your kind words, both of condolence and appreciation. I wish you luck in your career on Wikipedia. I hope you will carve out a niche for yourself, however small. Fowler&fowler«Talk»18:24, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Suggest removing comment
Hi Fowler, hope you are okay under the circumstances. I would suggest reverting your message here. It is quite personal to the IP, and doesn't progress discussion about the title. I would be interested to see what further points to consider emerge in the discussion, such as the order of the Supreme Court that has been raised. Best, CMD (talk) 10:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes Issue 68, March–April 2025
In this issue we highlight two resource renewals, #EveryBookItsReader, a note about Phabricator, and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.
F&f, I undid your edit here because, while I too have a (mild) aversion to the formatting issues you mentioned, it is best not to edit other editors' comments especially if they end up changing the meaning they convey. And equally importantly, the editing would have likely derailed the discussion from one about content, sources and due-weight to one about wiki-talkpage guidelines etc, which would have been a waste of editors' time. Hope you understand. Abecedare (talk) 16:06, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for telling me that a suspected sealion had expanded his/her attacks on you to another talk page. I was hoping to close down their activities on that page.
The way such editors win is by baiting the rest of us into doing things that make us look bad. Be careful. In either 2023 or 2024 another bad editor baited a hitherto good editor into making a racist comment - that got the previously-good editor an indefinite block. The bad editor does not mind blocks and bans.-- Toddy1(talk)13:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello again Toddy1. I've taken your advice to heart. I'm ignoring them and responding only to the critiques of Z1720 (who is an FAR regular), Vanamonde and Abecedare, both admins with South Asia-related experience. Your edits were very helpful too. So, thanks for those. Fowler&fowler«Talk»13:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Here I came to just deliver the annual reminder and came to know you more and more by details unfolding about the loss of part of your life. Looking at the green eyes of that cat. You will have to take care of the flowers and animals she loved, much more important than Wikipedia. I saw the May flowers with a friend last year who died in November. They just begin to bloom again. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, Gerda, for reading the announcement above (and on my user page) and for such an empathic and evocative reply. My wife was not on Wikipedia, but an avid Facebook user. Maintaining her Facebook page has helped. Her dozens, if not hundreds, of friends have responded. My wife was funny and an instant hit in unstructured situations, able to carry on two or three conversations simultaneously. I now have to do some of that by imagining what she would have done, digging deep in my memory. Strangely, I have become more social. The animals, of course, were partly my responsibility even earlier. The animals are ageing—the oldest cats are 18, and the dogs, 15—so the rituals around their care keep me busy. I've now returned to Wikipedia, but hopefully, more focusedly, working on the topics I originally intended to work on. Like everyone else's, my time on Planet Earth has a "use by" date. Thank you again for such a beautiful message. Fowler&fowler«Talk»11:25, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
PS I forgot to add, the yellow roses look beautiful. The leaves, too, are glistening. Thank you. I'm deeply sorry to hear about your friend's loss, Gerda.Fowler&fowler«Talk»22:01, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for all your thoughts! - I don't know if the premiere OTD of Verdi's Requiem is good for you, - ignore if not, otherwise see my talk - we sang it in 2010, and the (Jewish) friend who died took the pic, - he and his wife came to almost all our concerts --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, Gerda. Although I cut my musical teeth on the blues harmonica, took lessons from a player, and spent the requisite time in clubs during my youth, I do like classical music and listen to it now and then. Will take a look at your talk page. Thanks! Fowler&fowler«Talk»18:44, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
PS A double thanks to you Gerda, for posting above, because it made me realize that the section on Blues Harmonica Players was very old, and it needed to be seriously updated. I've added a little, but will look to writing a separate page, perhaps, and also Wikipedia pages on some players. Fowler&fowler«Talk»20:01, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
He has a very supple voice, Gerda. I didn't realize what a a veritable cornucopia you have there, one performance and perhaps more for each day of the year.
I noticed the Bolshoi. I saw them twice in Moscow, once on a beautiful summer evening in 1993 and a second time in the winter of 1994, when the snow was piled up high. I will view the video later.
Hi F&f. I've added a few points to the FA-discussion which I deem important. I'm afraid that maybe you may dislike the fact that I bring them up again, and I'm really sorry that this coincides with this tragic period in your life, so I would like to assure you that this stands separate from the appreciation I have for you and your contributions. I just still think that these points need to be addressed, but won't participate in further discussion on them; I've already spend to much time on it in 2020 and 2021. All the best, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!07:12, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi Joshua Jonathan. Thanks for such a considerate and sensitive post. I have replied to you on the article's talk page and made some changes, which in one instance hearkens to a change you yourself had made, if memory serves me correctly. Fowler&fowler«Talk»11:02, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
.jpg)
