This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
This is a Wikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Frap.
Hello there @Frap!. I saw your recent contributions to the first article I created MakeCode, and I wanna say thank you! Also, I found out that you and I are basically interested in the same subject, technology and computing. Would you mind becoming a wikifriend with me? Vinizex94 (talk) 12:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure! Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for creating articles and improving Wikipedia! I noticed that one of the GitHub link points a 404 though. -- Frap (talk) 12:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the warm welcome, User:Frap. Glad to connect with a fellow tech enthusiast here. 🙌
Ah—got it now. When you mentioned the GitHub link returning a 404, you meant it's pointing to a non-existent or broken page. I’ll take a look and fix it or replace it with a working link if I can find one. Appreciate you catching that!
And yes, I’d be happy to be wikifriends—always great to build with others who love tech and computing too. See you around the namespace! Vinizex94 (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Frap! Your additions to MoonBit (programming language) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think there has been a misunderstanding. I didn't create the MoonBit article, but I did edit the article but my edits had little to do with text of the article and more to do with infobox, categories, formatting, style, portals, templates, etc. Frap (talk) 21:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I've been looking at a few of your recent articles, and creations like Aurora Store, RISC-V ecosystem, Ed Calderon and Cockpit (software) do not meet the high bar for the autopatrolled userright. I can understand that you are creating these articles in good faith, and want to increase Wikipedia's coverage of FOSS software, but the current expectations from article creators who have the auto-patrolled user-right are that their articles have enough reliable references to clearly demonstrate that they are notable. None of the articles I linked do that. As a result, I'm revoking your autopatrolled userright so that the articles that you create get atleast a once-over by another member of the new page patrol folks (who can then identify issues and apply tags that you can fix). (also cc @HJ Mitchell who originally granted you the userright back in 2011)Sohom (talk) 03:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Software that doesn't meet requirements for GNG and has no sources other than a link to the gitlab with the files. I searched and couldn't find any reviews or other in-depth articles about it. I did find brief mentions in 2023 issues of Linux Format but not enough to support notability.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, I've noticed that you've flagged the article of Oxagon (Neom) for deletion discussion, but the talk page of the article is empty. Could you please explain the reason for marking the article? Ravan (talk) 11:27, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Frap, I have a few suggestions for the Partiful article. I see that you have an interest in technology, so I hope you'll be willing to take a look here. Thanks so much! Lucas285 (talk) 14:55, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The awards can either go next to the Google award, which is mentioned in the History section, or perhaps all of the awards could be put in a separate "Awards and recognition" section. Thanks for taking the time to review this, I appreciate your help, Lucas285 (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]