User talk:Gnevin/archive 1

The "drafts" that you have there are ok, but a team is either in one or the other championship. East or West!! So I'm not sure if that does anything for us... Is this how I should be responding (RDeane)

Unfortunatley, it is nearly impossible to find information on GAA players, probably because of their amateur status. Not much info can be written about the players, even DOB's are hard to come by.--Play Brian Moore 03:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you put a not up on the notice board, and havent got much of a responce which is not to unusuall. I might just over the weekend start to put the project together anway, i have noticed that people have a tendancy to join after the start up the before hand, it also the responce form the addations of Ecorry (talk • contribs) who apprently is Eoghan Corry, he also edits under the ip of 213.94.252.214 (talk • contribs). While his backgrounds are impressive, his addations to the GAA article, have been similar to txt dumps, being unformatted, and have a bookish flavour, it makes me wonder if is where this pov questions you have come across. Anway, at least with the project we can set up a standard, or at least a common look for the articles, from the proviences on down to the clubs, and so on. Let me know what you think. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 08:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well i'll work on trying to put something up their weekend, at least the start of something. As for Ecorry, if he is the person that it seems that he could be, then his adations are, at least in my opinion, a bit of a supprise. Basically i would not expect a historian, espically for the GAA, to write items that seem to be slanted in a particular way, which seems to be the case, for the most part, for articles out side of Kildare. Regardless though it seems like he does have a fiar amout of infomation ot provide, so i guess the best cours of action would be to engage him, and try to get him to but in less bookish/pov addations, and addations that are more along the style gusildelins that have been defacto, then see hwat happens from their. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 04:41, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was thinking, what should the project be named, GAA, Gaelic games, or Gaelic Athletic Association, all would have WikiProject before them. I woas thinking about going with Gaelic games, in so that the project would not seem so GAA centrict, thoughts? --Boothy443 | trácht ar 08:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know what to tel you about him. At least you have tried to engae him, seems to be unresponsive, anyway it looks as if we are just going to have to flus out his edits as we go along. You might want to bring it up to the notice board, see what they think, or something. Any wya just have to keep an eye on his edit and mke the needed changes, espically if he re-edits an article that some one has fixed up. As for the project it will hopefully be up either today or in the next couple of days, i have been a bit under the weather, and have been sidetracked by some other stuff. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah noticed that he has been quiet, or at least he has not hit my watchlist. Project goes up tommrow regardless, been distracted by some other things, anyway i have the frame work built. Figure i get it out and get some other hands to help build it out. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 08:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Up and running, Wikipedia:WikiProject Gaelic Games. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 00:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be removing a fair bit of content from GAA articles but you didn't use an edit summary. Are the players not playing for the teams any more, the large removals have me a little puzzled -- Tawker 19:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My edits to GAA pages seems to attracted some attention to explain i am doing the following

i am removing the line x is a prominent GAA club in County Kildare, significant in Kildare GAA history as it pov and cant be true for every club in kildare and removing the clubs links and adding them to category gaa clubs in kildare, i have asked user:ecorry to do this but he has ignored my request

(Gnevin 19:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Ok, would you mind using an edit summary, you're confusing more than a few RC patrollers :) -- Tawker 19:56, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can some one tell which of the following formats are correct as i want to set the correct format on Wikipedia:WikiProject Gaelic Games page

• {tl|Infobox GAA province - Infobox first ?
• tl|GAA county infobox - Infobox last , small c,small i?
• tl|GAA Club Infobox - Infobox last ,big c , big i ?

(Gnevin 14:14, 17 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Gnevin. I'm not too sure about Infobox naming, so I recommend you ask at the Help desk - where a few experts will be able to take a look. Good luck!--Commander Keane 14:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A chara, thanks very much for the introduction. You lads are welcome up in Omagh any time! Tír Eoghain abú 21:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gaelicfootball.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ed g2s • talk 14:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you flag this image: Image:Gaelicfootball.jpg. This image has been released into the pd. (Gnevin 15:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

That may be the case, but you have to provided evidence of this. ed g2s • talk 15:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How am i supposed to do that ? I asked a friend from http://www.gaaboard.com/ezboard/index.html for images and i got this and others. Is he now suppose to write a public statement? (Gnevin 15:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, the copyright holder (in this case - the photographer, or the photography agency) must explicity release it into the public domain. ed g2s • talk 15:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where on his web site or wiki? (Gnevin 15:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Either, but preferrably here, if he has an account. ed g2s • talk 15:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well its seems to me that the tag pd|release is pointless then . If the creator has to come to wiki himself to release the image it would be better too only allow the image creator too upload their work and remove this tag altogether. And since he doesnt have a wiki account himself wouldnt it be unbeliviable if a account is created just to relase an image ?? I'll will post a message on the gaa board too seem if he will create a wiki account but this whole systems seems flawed to me (Gnevin 15:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

He doesn't have to. It's just preferrable, as a posting on another site can't be trusted to still be there a year from now. It is always going to be impossible to prove these things absolutely, but one must try to provide sufficient evidence, so others can use the image without having to worry. A copy of the correspondence would probably suffice here. ed g2s • talk 15:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should we mention Dublin Colleges win in the Croke Cup, if so, where? User:Frainc

(Moved from incorrect place on user page)

Sorry about the lack of project activity, i have been caugught up in several other issues on the maine WP:IWNB and some related stuff, as well as trhying to get to something that i have been looking to get to, hopefully things will pick up over the simmer, if not might get a bump in activity during the all irelands, though i suspect that a majorty is going to be anons. Anyway i think the major thing we should direct the attention to for the project it article cleanup, espically the ecorry edit. Hopefully as things die down on this end i can direct more attention to the project. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

N/P, will do, might be able to get to some stuff over the weekend, see how it goes. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 23:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can any fix International_Space_Station at subsection Russian Research Module - 2009 i cant figure out why edit appears 6 times in this section of the artical (Gnevin 15:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Hi, can you please try posting your message at the talk page of the relevant article (Talk:International_Space_Station)? That way, people experienced with the article will be able to help you out. Cheers, Tangotango 15:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Parnell Park.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

You have a serious misconception concerning the policy on pov. Please read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view carefully:

• "all articles must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly and without bias" (my emphasis here and in what follows).
• "The policy requires that, where there are or have been conflicting views, these should be presented fairly, but not asserted. All significant points of view are presented, not just the most popular one."
• "As the name suggests, the neutral point of view is a point of view, not the absence or elimination of viewpoints."
• And: "assert facts, including facts about opinions — but don't assert opinions themselves."

All the quotes here are from official Wikipedia policy and not just a guideline that you may ignore. Trying to eliminate the Shi'a viewpoint is in direct contravention of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. I hope this clarifies the issue. --Lambiam^Talk 23:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.......................................

You write "Compare this ali articial to Jesus (prophet in Islam) and you'll see its doesnt relpy on a page of quotes." Well, that is actually a severe weakness of that article. See Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research, which mandate citing sources. How else can we know some editor is not making it up when s/he writes: "According to Islam, no sacrifice can add to divine grace nor replace the necessity of repentance"? I could add {{citation needed}} to about every other sentence there and be absolutely right in doing so – not that I am planning to do that.

Where you write "Their views as scholars and thats all they are are views should no more be on wiki than mine," I totally disagree. What do you think, should any views at all be presented on Wikipedia? If not, we can scrap basically all articles, except maybe some stating that 2 times 2 equals 4.

Now concerning your observation that the article neutralizes negative comments by countering them with positive ones. You may be right, but is that a ground for deletion? Quoting from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion: "The argument 'non-neutral point of view' (violates WP:NPOV) is often used, but often such articles can be salvaged, so this is not a very strong reason for deletion." And from Wikipedia:Guide to deletion: "A failure to conform to a neutral point of view is usually remedied through editing for neutrality". In fact, I'd say: {{sofixit}}. --Lambiam^Talk 00:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying too update Image:Croke_park_seating.jpg to the image found here [[1]](i've saved its as jpg) .I hit update but the image isnt changing to new version . any help you can offer would be apperiated (Gnevin 21:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

N/M Server must just be slow(Gnevin 21:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I just kinda glanced over it, and i have some ideas, though i'll have to look at it more. Any way, i think it might be better just to have one, then seperate onces for the different players, but i still need tot look at it. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Help Needed[reply]

Hi i've just about finished my update to {{Infobox GAA player}} ,if you could please have a look at it and make a few suggestions that would be most helpful it can be found in my sandbox here user:Gnevin/sandbox1 , Thanks (Gnevin 20:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC))

Hi Gnevin. Had a look at your new infobox and what you've done seems good. I don't know if its my browser but the county and provincial details don't come up. Also you need to show what intercounty awards and all-stars the player has won. Maybe as a Dub you want to keep that bit quiet :) Afn 09:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What brower did you look at , did you check out user:Gnevin/sandbox2 for the full thing? (Gnevin 18:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC))

My browser is IE but it's working now. The infobox is ok- a bit long but it get's all the relevent info. Now we need to fill them! Afn 09:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy? I made those changes to the hurling championship page. Thought it looked a bit more classy. I didn't get around to changing the previous hurling and football pages. I don't mind which style is used but I just thought the new style looked better.

I don't think I have any more info on Hill 16. I'll try to dig summit up on it and do something to the page. (CorkMan 17:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

How do i leave a note that only people that edit the page can see i know it can be done but i can't remember it (Gnevin 12:33, 18 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I think you mean HTML comments. Simply enclose your comment with <!-- and -->. Cheers, Tangotango 12:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Gnevin. :) - Tangotango 12:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Myself and a girl from Clare set this up yesterday, trying to get as many members as possible. No dubs on it yet either. Gaelic HQ

Hope to see ya there --Tiocfaídh Ár Lá! 13:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good although I would change preferred code to sport as their are very few players who play both.--Play Brian Moore 00:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was not suggesting that the GAA was a republican organisation, but that it was an organisation that included and influenced republicans. (If you read the new biography of Eoin O'Duffy you'll see the impact his role on Monaghan GAA had on his politics in the War of Independence.) It was intended to link the GAA to the Nationalist template too as both Nationalists and Republicans were impacted upon by the GAA (and other societies that themselves weren't necessarily Republican). The idea with this (and the other templates on Nationalism, Monarchism and Unionism) is to link topics that people interested in the area should go to. It isn't saying that something on the list is republican, or nationalist, or monarchist, or unionist, merely that the issue gives context in understanding the topic. And the GAA as a mass membership organisation involved in stoking up a sense of Irish identity did play a part in increasing the demand for separation from Britain. So did the Abbey Theatre and the Irish Ireland movements but neither were republican. Indeed Douglas Hyde was passionately anti-republican and quit the Gaelic League when Pearse and co began infiltrating it.

That alone was the reason for the GAA's inclusion. It wasn't meant to mean 'GAA=republican' But the template was still a work in progress. If you see a problem with its inclusion, as clearly you do, then I won't include it. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 04:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I there a tag i can put on Football firm which basicly says a large part of the articial is unsourced and the realibilty of the information is in question ? (Gnevin 16:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Just put {{unsourced}} at the top of the article. Cheers, Tangotango 16:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then choose the most appropriate template from the comprehensive directory at Wikipedia:Template messages. There are quite a few varieties, you'll have to see which one fits the article in question best. - Tangotango 16:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would references in swedish fail WP:RS see Football firm (Gnevin 18:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Put them in English, or copy them from Swedish WP.--Chili14 18:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Western Canadian Championship 2004
• Western Canadian Championship 2005
• Western Canadian Championship 2006 why don't these page display correctly (Gnevin 23:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I'm not sure what is incorrect about them...could you be a bit more specific? Sorry I can't help more...put the {{helpme}} template back up if you need more help. —Keakealani 01:18, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The tables are all messed up if you try to put a header in such as == Ladies == its doesnt work right

The tables look fine to me (though I don't think a layout with text on the left and pretty wide tables on the right side is a good idea), could you describe what you are trying to achieve and how it's "all messed up" ? Equendil Talk 11:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated Boxrec.com for deletion but the template doesnt appear to show correctly , can someone fix it please (Gnevin 16:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Hi, I've fixed it. What I think you did was put the deletion reason as a parameter in the template; you don't have to do this, just type {{subst:afd}}. People who want to know your reasoning can find it easily enough by following the link to "this article's entry", so it isn't included in the template – Gurch 16:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

help-me is their a template like {{complete}} for categorys (17:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC))

I'm sure that you could just use that template for categories too. Although, something can never be truly done with a wiki. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 18:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The GAA logo Image:GAA Corporate Logo.png is a fair use wiki image. Is it ok to use on a picture like Image:GAACollage.png (Gnevin 18:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

If used there, the collage could then only be used as fair use. —Centrx→talk • 22:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was careful sorting the stub on the article that you wrote on my talk page! When I sorted it, there was no mention of Gaelic Football in the article, just plain Football in a location in the Republic of Ireland. The beauty of Wikipedia is that you were able to put the proper stub on it quickly once you identified the issue. --- Skapur 19:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You recently removed substantive content from the Gaelic Athletic Association page citing "pov in the extreme". Please be careful not to unilaterally remove content from Wikipedia based on subjective reasoning. You should first discuss any such changes on the article's talk page, or the page may be protected and/or you may be subject to a block. Thank you. 216.194.1.23 19:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the amendment, I haven't really got a clue how Wikipedia works but I love sticking up Laois GAA info on it. Cheers, Heshs Umpire.Heshs Umpire 11:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I guess I seem to leave every edit as a minor edit, never really thought about it before, up the dubs! Frainc 23:56 11 September 2006 (UTC)

At least one person seemed to be confused by the name, and redirects are cheap. If you feel strongly about it, I'll delete it instead. NawlinWiki 15:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_31#Category:Blue_plaques, it just needs a description.--Andeh 20:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep no problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Derry Boi (talk • contribs)

I had a look at the positions article and it looks great, its very useful to have a proper explanation of the position, the Kama sutra of Gaelic football. I added a few small details, id appreciate if you could check them over in case they are not useful. I was also wondering if it would be worthwhile mentioning which foot each positions asks of a player. For example, right half forwards are generally left footed etc, or am i wrong? Frainc 20:57 15 September

(I accidentally posted this on User talk:Johan Elisson):
See the discussion on Football firm. It makes no sense to call the article Football firm if it says they can support other sports. If you want to mention other sports, then the title must be changed to Hooligan firm or something else. So make up your mind, because this has to be solved once and for all.Spylab 01:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Spylab[reply]

Sorry, Gnevin, but I don't quite understand your request. Do you want me to translate 11, the article about the year 11 AD or some other article? And also, into what language? I would guess Gaeilge, but I don't want to jump to conclusions.

Look forward to being able to help.

Le meas, Joe Byrne -- Talk -- Contribs - :ga: - :fr: - - 12:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll see what I can do. Joe Byrne -- Talk -- Contribs - :ga: - :fr: - - 13:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm trying to add a little footnote reference to the Paddy Bradley artcile. You'll see the superscript number 1 besidehis scoring, but I can't get the footnote to appear at the bottom of the infobox. Any help would be appreicated, becasue I'm not greatt these things. Thanks. (Derry Boi 13:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

RE: Thanks. I was trying to add the reference to the actual infobox itself, but I se it looks better on the main body of the article where you put it. What other note did you mean? (Derry Boi 13:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

No problem. (Derry Boi 07:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Grand, sorry about that. I'll make sure to do that in future. Pauric 16:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that Duff Beer has been moved to Duff Beer (The Simpsons), 99.44% of these links now need to be cleaned up. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 11:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gnevin, Still learning to use this wonderful resource. Have a prob with licencing those images. The second one [close up of Seamus] is noted as public image but the other one at the top of the page is from Hogan Stand. How do I go about keeping those? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerry Boy (talk • contribs)

The "drafts" that you have there are ok, but a team is either in one or the other championship. East or West!! So I'm not sure if that does anything for us... Is this how I should be responding (RDeane)—Preceding unsigned comment added by RDeane (talk • contribs)

Alright I see what your saying. Lets say some lad in Malawi says to himself, "hey we've had games going on here for the years", then the template should accomodate these sorts of people. How would a person who wants to input a new GAA club be able to find the template?--RDeane 00:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC) RDeane[reply]

Very cool, the new dub template looks much nicer than the links, stick it on! Frainc 01:08 04 OCtober 2006

The excellent content of WP:BITE for your consideration.

I agree that Ozzwald's early edits were a problem, but the end result of your discussions didn't get the right message across to him.

It is important for Wikipedia, in the long term, that we gently and positively educate newcomers, so that we don't drive off enthusiastic people who don't understand WP yet.

Thanks, and good editing. Georgewilliamherbert 20:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ozzwald35 was fumbling badly but trying to do something that was fundamentally clearly not vandalistic; he was trying to improve Wikipedia. You can only call what he was doing vandalism if you assume bad faith, which is also against WP policy. They were bad edits (to an article), but would have been fine on the talk page. Once someone explained that to him, he immediately started doing the right thing and discussing it on the talk page.

All you did is call him a vandal, which is unfortunate, but if you'd reacted more severely you'd be violating WP:BITE and WP:AGF, and you'd have admins at least warning you. Don't bite the newbies is important. You're relatively new yourself, which explains why you may not be as familiar with its importance, but you've edited a lot and need to start handling problems with more sophistication. Please keep that in mind in the future. Georgewilliamherbert 17:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read the discussion and in the end, I still saw no permission to tag the image as public domain. -Nv8200p talk 12:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry to drop this message onto your page but I'm trying to invoke a discussion on the WP:IMOS page as to what to use for the historical references to the city of Derry/Londonderry. I am trying to obtain a non-POV neutral discussion over what terminology to use for this or whether the IMOS as it stands should indeed cover this. Since you have been involved in discussions over Derry or County Londonderry and the likes in the past I thought you may like to get involved in the discussion. See the appropriate talk to get involved. Thank you for your time. Ben W Bell talk 16:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everytime I log into Wikipedia I see you've done loads of edits. Hope I've typed it up right.

The Original Barnstar For dedication to your areas of expertise, your persistence in correcting the small errors on articles and also your work with infoboxes. Frainc talk 11:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the {{GaelicGamesProject}} template to articles with existing talk pages in the GAA County Championships Category. Unfortunately, AWB won't create a page, even a talk page, where one doesn't exist so I couldn't get them all. However, all of the existing talk pages now have the template.

Let me know if I can be any help in the future.

Epolk 23:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the template to the articles in the Gaelic Athletic Association stubs category. The same caveat as before applies. It is only on pages with existing Talk pages. The total number of pages I tagged was 99 but there are a couple that I double tagged due to an itchy mouse finger. If you need anymore help, drop me line but I won't be able to get to it till tomorrow.

Epolk 23:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about a county championship infobox, something along these lines,

{{Infobox Football County Championship |
 |image=|
 |year=|
 |relegated team=|
 |promoted team=|
 |matches=|
 |poty=|
 |winners=|
 |ordinal=|
 |captain=|
 |manager=|
}}

It would be cool to have an info box for the articles such as Dublin Senior Club Football Championship 2006 or the Derry Senior Club Football Championship! Is it possible? Frainc 21:57 October 18 2006.

Yes, something like that but with things that are more relevant such as 'promoted team, relegated team' etc. Frainc 22:29 18 October 2006

Excellent, thats exactly what I was looking, thanks, rya gonna put it on the page? Frainc 22:53 18 October 2006

u suggested i dont put them in... y not. if the article is a stub (as most of mine are), then aren't the years a good starting point for future editors??

ok then--Macca7174 10:43, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, thanks a mill. Currently working on adding the winners and runners-up of the Leitrim football championship. I'm taking them from a page at leitrimgaa.ie, I hope that's okay! More on its discussion page where I'm about to raise it as a query.

Cothrom na Féinne duit —Preceding unsigned comment added by DellusMaximus (talk • contribs)

My bad! DellusMaximus 18:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

— Indon (reply) — 22:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, means a lot to get a bit of recognition, it took ages to get the pages up and running, still loads to do!! Frainc 13:29, 30 October 2006.

cheers also for having a look at my Tyrone GAA article. I was going to ask someone on the project page if they would have a look to see if i wrote too much. I need to get a bit more info now though, such as final scores, adn citable sources.--Macca7174 14:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance youd be able to make an infobox for the county championships pages, i remember u did a infobox for the current events ones, like Dublin Senior Football Championship 2006. The following information would be needed:

Image
Official title = for example evening herald champo
Irish Language title
The year the championship began
First winner
Current Champions (with no. of wins)
The club who won most championships(with no. of wins)
and any other info u deem necessary

(Frainc 11:59, November 6, 2006 (UTC))

Cool, thatl be good to have that info box, ur right sunday was a rough one, gonna watch vins win now, Frainc 19:37 6 November 2006

I have made a comment at Talk:Croke Park#Fixture list and reverted there. Can we discuss it over there. Frelke 20:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the name of the stub {{gaelic-sport-stub}} to {{gaelic-games-stub}}?
I thought the proposal was to do with sub-categorising bios into {{gaelic-sport-bio-stub?
The current change will inevitably cause confusion if people, like I was, had gotten used to writing {{gaelic-sport-stub}} --Macca7174 02:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that template looks great.

Thanks. Derry Boi 19:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just returning your message and saying yes I'd be interested in the GAA project Jj2005 15:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest it wasn't exactly clear. I'd suggest creating either a football/hurling split, or a biographies subcat, but not both, as that would tend to create a lot of double-stubbing on the one hand, and pretty small stub-types on the other. Alai 02:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The hurling/football split seems good to me; certainly there were no objections to it at the WSS page. Since these should also be tagged with an {{Ireland-bio-stub}} template, the need for separating the bios would be less urgent, I'd think. (OTOH, we might be about due for a general {{Ireland-sport-bio-stub}}.) Alai 14:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for asking, i want to ask the method of revert edits ,done by any crazy user. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammad adil (talk • contribs)

thanks for telling me that. one thing more i want to ask.i uploaded an image on wikipedia but it was deleted saying " image copyright problem ".

can you tell me any method of uploading an image so that it will not be deleted ? Mohammad Adil 18:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

how to make a campaign box for any militery personality ? as there is in this article some one made it for me there .....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_ibn_Walid

Mohammad Adil 18:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst it is very good of you to try to help newbies, it would be better if you gave them correct advice and set them a good example by signing your contributions. See this edit and my correction. -- RHaworth 08:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you take the photo yourself? --Guinnog 01:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No hene why it should be deleted (Gnevin 01:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

You seem like you have a lot a knowledge with respect Irish history so maybe you would like to comment on the historic basis of this term here Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-02 IRA 'Volunteer' usage —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DownDaRoad (talk • contribs) 00:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

There are alot of wikipedians using IMAGES in their sig. From Ireland too. You Could 'boost' your edit ratings a hell of alot if you sent them ALL the message you sent me. Culnacréann 00:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do apologise; it looks like I accidentally deleted one of your edits while copyediting the article. --Guinnog 20:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you keep editing the Belfast Celtic article and reverting my edits without giving an explaination. If there is a problem with how the article is written please put it in the discussion page rather than vandalising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.208.214.206 (talk • contribs)

Would appreiciate it of you could make a template for the Derry 1993 team like the one here. THe team for the final is here. Thanks. Derry Boi 14:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah thats looks great. Yeah the numbers are all correct and the manager was Éamonn Coleman. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Derry Boi (talk • contribs) 22:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]