User talk:InfiniteNexus/Archive 14

This is an archive of past discussions with User:InfiniteNexus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Since you reverted my edit on android 18, I suggest that **you** tell me 5 years later, or whenever Google releases or starts development on Android 18, to redo my edit and add the not to the confused with. But if you fail upon that promise, you will be considered the singular biggest failure of an Wikipedian and will be shun forever in the history of Wikipedia. But if I fail to I will be considered the singular biggest failure of an Wikipedian, and will be shun forever in the history of Wikipedia. If we both fail we will share the title, and if neither one of us fails we will both be considered the totally greatest editors on Wikipedia. I swear I will make it-- Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 07:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm going to assume that this comment was made with humorous intents (Poe's law) and not a borderline personal attack. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:45, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

It is, and I personally dare you to follow this... Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 08:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Well, five years later this won't be a problem, per WP:NOPRIMARY. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:08, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus

When you are correcting for a bad page move, please, please, please, leave a redirect when you move back the page. You can see here at User:AnomieBOT III/Broken redirects, that not leaving a redirect when you corrected the page move for What If...? (TV series) left 22 broken redirects that would otherwise be deleted by AnomieBOT III if some editor doesn't take the trouble to fix them manually. So, I created a new redirect from the bad page title to the correct page title and hopefully the Wikipedia bots will correct these double redirects.

So, before you move a page back after a bad page move, please check "What links here" and if there are redirects to the article, then leave a redirect with the page move OR you can correct all of the broken redirects so they point to the correct page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:27, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

@Liz: Thank you for letting me know. I did check for any incoming links to the bad title, but neglected to check for redirects because I didn't think Xqbot would get to them that quickly (and I had yet to reach said redirects on my watchlist). Evidently I was wrong, and for that I do apologize. I've now (semi-)manually fixed the broken redirects, so you may delete What If...? (animated TV series) unless there is another reason why you believe it should be kept. Thanks again. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:47, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi InfiniteNexus,

As the list of films and works in the DC Extended Universe grows, so will the list of characters, which I think even now has reached a length that is getting difficult to navigate. I think that will be the case regardless of whether or not James Gunn reboots the entire DCEU/DCU as some have theorized. In that case I think that it might be a good idea to split the article into several pages in the same or a similar manner to Characters of the Marvel Cinematic Universe being split into a central "directory" page, a couple of pages ordered in alphabetical order, and by TV series. Thoughts? - - WuTang94 (talk) 16:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

@WuTang94: I certainly would not be opposed to a split per WP:SIZERULE, the readable prose size of 135 kB more than justifies a split and/or trim. But before you do anything, I would advise consulting additional editors (preferably established users) who edit "in-universe" DCEU articles, if possible; it strikes me as a little odd that you chose to post this here rather than on Talk:Characters of the DC Extended Universe, which I am also watching. I also notice that the DCEU characters page uses a Central/Supporting/Minor system similar to the one used by the MCU characters page before it was decided to split the page; from those discussions it was concluded that assigning characters to labels such as Central/Supporting/Minor is arbitrary and subjective, and "Antagonists" goes against WP:ANTAGONIST. All the more reason to restructure the page alphabetically, but again, that's just my opinion. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

@InfiniteNexus I reached out as I deeply value and respect your opinion and expertise, seeing that you've had a big hand in organizing and revamping not only the MCU pages, but also DCEU ones. I appreciate you getting back to me as well. With that being said, I do agree with a lot of what you said and will open up a discussion on the DCEU Characters talk page, if none currently exists, so that more editors can also voice their thoughts and opinions. WuTang94 (talk) 02:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

​Thanks. While I truly appreciate you reaching out specifically to me, for major article overhauls like this it's better to gather as many opinions as possible so we achieve a more accurate consensus that reflects the entire community of editors who edit in that area. I'll reply over there shortly. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

I see you participate in the Technology WikiProject. I made a proposal to update the article on DXC Technology. You can see the proposal here: Talk:DXC Technology#Discussion on proposals Sep ‘22. I have a conflict of interest, so I am refraining from direct edits of the article. Could you possibly look at the proposals? Sincere thanks, Epictetusfollower (talk) 23:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the work on Pixel 6 and Pixel 7!

I've created a WikiProject proposal for WikiProject Android. I believe you would be interested in this project based on your work on those two articles. Feel free to comment there for any questions. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll take a look. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

What the top says why do we never mention Disney not distributing 20th Century films? I NEED TO KNOW DONT IGNORE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NakhlaMan (talk • contribs) 08:12, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

@NakhlaMan: I wasn't ignoring you. As you can see from my contributions history, I have been away (offline) for the last 36 hours. I also have a {{Busy}} notice at the top of this page that says This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. It seems very rude of you to write I NEED TO KNOW DONT IGNORE! in all caps. I will respond over there shortly, thank you for your patience. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:47, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

—El Millo (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

—El Millo (talk) 07:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Trailblazer101 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

– The Grid (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for the WikiLove and returning it back as there's been great times editing and collaborating with you this past year, hope all is well and look forward to a positive 2023! – The Grid (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I didn't ignore the hidden note, I was just stating that Avatar 3 and Avatar 4 will not be the final titles of the movies, just that they are placeholders used by the film's cast and crew. Advofspec (talk) 21:56, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

The purpose of hidden notes is to ask editors not to change something without good reason, for there is consensus for the current wording. As stated in the hidden notes on Avatar 3, Avatar 4 and Avatar 5, these are the titles that the studio is using officially to refer to these films at this time, so we should follow suit rather than falsely claim it is untitled (which means the studio has not given it a title). It does not matter that they are placeholder titles, film titles are subject to change at any time, so technically all titles are not "final" until the films are released and we are 100% certain there will be no further title changes. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:10, 29 December 2022 (UTC)