This is an archive of past discussions with User:InfiniteNexus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
@JRobinson99: This is not solely based on the Rotten Tomatoes score, but rather the entire "Critical response" section. In fact, the Metacritic summary reads mixed or average reviews. If you wish to contest this WP:STATUSQUO wording, please discuss on the article's talk page first instead of simply reverting my edits (which may be considered WP:DISRUPTIVE or WP:EDITWARRING). InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
First, thanks for your hard work to keep Wikipedia up-to-date and accurate. I truly appreciate the efforts of editors such as yourself to make this site safe and reliable.
I tried to add my twitter account to my Wikipedia page as an anonymous editor yesterday, but it was removed. Is it possible to add social media accounts to a public figure’s Wikipedia page under external links?
For reasons I think we can both understand, superhero film cast lists tend to attract endless tinkering (only military films, where enthusiasts want to include every rank variation, seem to come close) in comparison to other film genres. WP:CASTLIST exists in part to establish a standardized baseline for how we present casts in order to avoid endless edit wars over "Dr. Henry 'Hank' McCoy" vs. "Hank McCoy" vs. "Beast" vs. "Hank McCoy / Beast" vs...you get the idea. There is a provision in CASTLIST that states All names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source (emphasis mine); however, we don't normally do this unless there is some reason the additional information/name is necessary and/or advisable (e.g., properly identifying the Cloaked Figure played by Temeura Morrison in the ninth episode of The Mandalorian) or in the case of uncredited characters (such as Taylor-Johnson and Olsen in the second Captain America film). Even so, it's a precarious thing to do with superhero films, because different secondary sources can still present different variations (some sources called Elizabeth Olsen the Scarlet Witch long before the MCU established her as such, and there is already edit warring at the Venom: Let There Be Carnage article over whether or not Graham's character is Toxin), at which point the initial problem re-presents itself. Grandpallama (talk) 14:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
@Grandpallama: I get not naming their superhero aliases if they are not made clear in the film, but the full names which I added are explicitly stated in the film or the previous installments, plus they are backed up by multiple reliable sources in the article. Nonetheless, I have no desire to spend time fighting for this change, so I'll just let it slide for now. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pixel 6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4K.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pietro Maximoff (Marvel Cinematic Universe) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Why are you deleting my edits citing it to be trivial info?
Hi InfiniteNexus,
Why are you deleting my contributions/edits citing it to be trivial information on Google Forms? It's a stub article and it barely has any details. I added very relevant information that would help users understand more of it's features and the edit made talks about a very cool feature of google forms that was never there before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DiagonAlly7 (talk • contribs) 04:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Are you able to provide an updated image of the Google Slides interface that falls under fair use? The current one that can be found on the Google Slides Wikipedia page is in fact outdated, so any help would be much appreciated in replacing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:194:c000:1430:dc1f:9d37:9651:ca71 (talk) 19:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
@ViperSnake151:{{Infobox software}} states that the "Developer" parameter is for the Name of the current developer of the software (bolding my own). Therefore, how should it still say Facebook and not Meta? Also, I see no problem with indicating the fact that FB is now known as Meta in the lede. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Oculus products are hardware, not software. And that is also about having multiple developers. Look at all of the classic Macintosh products (i.e. Power Mac G4) and notice that the company is consistently addressed as Apple Computer, and not retconned to Apple, Inc. ViperSnake151 Talk 21:27, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Sorry @InfiniteNexus:, the frame does have a scroll bar below the table's last row. I was expecting a scroll bar for the page (and not have to scroll down in order to find a horizontal scroll bar). --rootsmusic (talk) 02:35, 3 November 2021 (UTC)