Thank you! I thought of it, but with all the different names it's had over te years, I considered "Site of" to be better suited. I created a page for "Fort Andross" that links to this one though. Jake-jakubowski (talk) 18:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jake! If you want to keep the poster of the movie on Wikimedia Commons it might be necessary to send a mail to permissions-commonswikimedia.org to prove that you hold the copyright to the image Trade (talk) 16:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Very nice job on the article! Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
An article you recently created, Kerry Tremain, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969TT me12:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 I completely understand why there is a notability issue with the article, however, I am confused as to why you think there is a UPE/COI issue? I was not paid for this article, nor do I know the subject. JakeJakubowskitalk20:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am in the middle of creating a sandbox page titled List of National Geographic cover stories. I am starting to realize that, when complete, it may be way too long. My question is, would it be recommended to break out the list into decades? Or even by year? If I do it by decade, there will be 120 References, which may also be too much?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
If it is recommended that the list be broken out into decades or years I will place a template at the bottom of each page like this.
Hello, Jake-jakubowski. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wendy K. Ulmer bibliography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Please read the guidance at WP:PROD. The prod template to propose non-controversial deletions should only be used on mainspace articles, not articles in draftspace. I have removed the two you placed on drafts. Schazjmd(talk)19:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jake-jakubowski. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. – Joe (talk) 10:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
