User talk:Kung Fu Man/archive6

Ahaha, actually, I never made much progress with Pichu, but looking at the content you've scrounged up, it's definitely doable; that's a good start for conception information. I'll look for reception sometime. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 02:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'll do my best. I may be biased but I've searched for sources before and there is what I'd call sufficient coverage on him out there, just been far too lazy to fix the article until now. Thanks. --Monere (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I spruced up the Raziel article and consider it more or less worth staying where it is now; may even be worth a class reassessment. Take another look at it, let me know what you think. Thanks. --Monere (talk) 19:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Pokémon Barnstar
		For finding all this reception on Pokémon! We can now revive a great handful of articles. (Mainly generation one) Blake (Talk·Edits) 01:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 04:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the edit I made but one most remember that if we give users to much freedom on this site they will begin to walk all over the rules. You will not be censored be me again, but your reply does beg the question of why some individuals are banned for profanity and some are not? What is an account holder to make of these double standards that wikipedia seems to allow, are there no rules at all on wiki?Fakecatholic (talk) 16:43, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:New Age Retro Hippie - there's a list of articles I'd like to see created. If you share any interest in any in particular, gimme a ring and we can work on them. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 05:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Save-japan-cat.jpg DO you reside in Japan? « ₣M₣ » 23:50, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Cause after I saw your epic image, I thought about SSBB... which will be on the main page soon with no image. I wonder if it is possible to locate the office used for its development after doing some research to find out exactly where it is in Takadanobaba. « ₣M₣ » 19:08, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Personally, I feel that he qualifies as unseen by the fact that for the majority of the game, we never see him in full form, kind of like with GLaDOS. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:41, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm, I dunno. I think if the characters are well-noted as being unseen characters - like for GLaDOS, so many critics/players consider GLaDOS as an unseen character - I think the exception can be made. GLaDOS is famous for being unseen, and while she does appear at the end, it's more the unseen parts that made her famous. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you did so much work on Mr. Mime, which I used as a sort of starting template, I wanted your opinion on User:Scapler/Rayquaza, and what you believe its chances of being kept (rather than deleted, to state the obvious) from the real-world information and references are. I would appreciate it! Cheers! Scapler (talk) 06:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your suggestions. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 11:47, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to put it in mainspace, we'll see how it goes. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to take a page from your book and make up this, after making what I think are great starts for Zidane Tribal and Vivi Orunitia. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 17:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Video Game Barnstar
		For your amazing work at the Pokémon articles I give you with this Barnstar. Nicely done.Tintor2 (talk) 17:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, while this is probably true, I think the comment in particular reflects more so to Weezing even though the article is about Arbok. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:01, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For that reference style that you could not "make heads or tails of", please see WP:CITESHORT. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 21:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I can cut in, while that style can be useful it applies only to printed materials, not sources that can be found online (of which there were a very great many). See U2 for an example. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 21:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I more adhere to it because "they avoid the inevitable clutter when long citations are inserted into the source text". I wasn't opposed to changing it, however, as it appears there is probably consensus for it, and it matches the other Pokémon article referencing styles. I feel like I should apologize to Kung Fu Man; upon reading my comment above, it seems sort of rude, which was not my intention at all, merely to inform. Side effect of limited inflection online, and I apologize again. Nothing meant. Have a good day and Cheers! Scapler (talk) 21:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, that style of referencing is for if you are refering to multiple different pages in one book. You could have the book information listed separate from the reflist, where you just have the page number.. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 22:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion on the above proposed deletion is underway, and as one of the Project Members, I thought you might like to contribute your views at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/BioWare.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 12:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was just reading your article on Haunter; don't you think it'd be better to call it "Gastly, Haunter, and Gengar"? Gives it a wider coverage but doesn't make them seem irrelevant, since they're pretty much inclusive with each other most of the time. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 07:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Argh... such a tease! "Mew two, Hypno, and Haunter are favorites amongst children because..." Curse you Google Books! - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rugal passed GA! Good work Kung Fu Man.Tintor2 (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, do you plan to make Tifa a GA?Tintor2 (talk) 13:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, that doesn't bother me. The only thing that bothers me is that most of the creation section is unsourced.Tintor2 (talk) 14:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that was fast! About Liu Kang, I don't know. I don't know what can be used to source a parts from his design section and like always my prose is not very good. By the way, there is a free image of Robin Shou in Shou's article, maybe that could replace the one of "in other media".Tintor2 (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if Shou commented something about his role as Kang than can be used in the other media section?Tintor2 (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I know you are busy with the FFVIII FAR (by the way good work). Take your time.Tintor2 (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True. Two editors, that's not so silent after all, since that's all it takes to have one Good Article still under reassessment wiped from the Project Index. Spira and Gaia are not GAs, yet they still exist, and in even worse condition then what World of Final Fantasy VIII was by Project standard's. — Blue。 15:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, where does it say demoted? The GAR page still shows it as pending. I looked for a decision, but all I saw was your edit on the GA page. Even the article's talk page still shows pending. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 16:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. No problem, it's just good to have double checks once in a while. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 18:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You mentioned a lack of news results for Wally Week being a contributing factor for the redirect of this page to Mikro-Gen, do a couple of articles in Crash and Your Sinclair not count to making the character even a little notable?

If not then I am quite hapy to let your decision stand. AirRaidPatrol 84 (talk) 18:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a go in a sandbox and if there appears to be enough then I'll redirect back to the character article. Thanks for your input. AirRaidPatrol 84 (talk) 18:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there's not really enough out there to support an article on the song- you'd think there would be, but the majority of sources that mention it just say the same thing, that it's an "iconic song" that is the "most popular" Final Fantasy song. You basically would end up with the second paragraph of the creation section of Music of the Final Fantasy VII series, plus a paragraph or two of reception that mostly says the same thing over and over, and that's about it. There's just not that many reliable sources that discuss video game music out there, even if you stretch the definition. --PresN 18:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As with many other articles, it is a slow process to achieve GAN, but I will do so. You have my word. Subzerosmokerain (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"My name is Ash McGowen, and I don't give a fig about this Inclusionist/Deletionist debate. I just build on what works, remove what doesn't."

Nice, I love that outlook. High five :V - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 07:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you removed the {{Copied}} at Talk:Nemesis (Resident Evil). Since some content (the EGM list) came from the list article's history, attribution must be maintained. The relevant guideline is WP:Copying within Wikipedia. I wrote an examination of the Nemesis content's multiple-article history at WT:Articles for deletion/List of creatures in the Resident Evil series (2nd nomination), but I haven't implemented my dummy edit workaround. I'm pretty confident in that analysis, but let me know of any errors. Flatscan (talk) 04:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand the logic to remove voice acting information from her reception. I don't see why such information is less relevant than the reception that was left in the article; the information is directly related to her, and it could be said that the quality of her voice acting relied on the actor's attempt to speak in such a way that she expects the character to. I've never understood this; if a character wins an award, it is true that the source material would share credit, but the reception came from the general quality of the character, not the game. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's an interesting point. Come on, let's get into character. [aka - point taken.] Perhaps though we could make a quick mention of her voice acting quality? I mean, it's not entirely out of the question, don't you think?

And on an unrelated note, I did a massive dump of Bowser reception; you're far more knowledgeable with what's good for sources, and much better at picking what's good for reception than I, so if you have any spare time could you spare a hand? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 08:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! It is not true that "not a single thing's been done to improve the article." Please note these additions. As with last time, I do usually add material to the articles under discussion and do not only template them and comment in the discussion. Thank you. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 18:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes because adding reception that has nothing to do with the actual characters is a great improvement (and please note by that I mean characters on the list. Bowser and so forth have their own articles). You basically did a block quote that ends up having less to do with the article at hand than improving it. What do puzzles have to do with the character list? Nothing. It just looks big so your best bet is to hope nobody gives it a critical read and is satisfied with the end results at a glance, and the same issues being brought up by other editors still persist.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 19:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy that you acknowledge that it is a great improvement. Thanks! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 19:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...what?'--Kung Fu Man (talk) 19:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently trimming Rikku's reception. Do you think she warrants more mention of her voice actor due to being a pretty well-known voice actor, the award she received for her portrayal, and for appearing multiple times to voice her? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the time has come for this article to meet its cleaner, given that the plot section now runs to nearly 7,000 words across nearly 40 paragraphs, and that the article has only one decent reference at present. Its become a right mess. I'll still have to work on the finishing touches to Elaine's article, as well as get some cleanup work on Tales of Monkey Island now that's fully released, I was rather hoping you might be willing to lend a hand with finding sources—particularly reception—for LeChuck: you're better at source-finding than I am. -- Sabre (talk) 22:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Half Barnstar
		This is for yours and Tintor's tireless work on Liu Kang's article which just recently has been edited to a point in which I believe it is ready for a GAN review. Nice job, you deserve this. Subzerosmokerain (talk) 02:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to take a minute to thank you for doing the GA review for the article, and for the kind words within it. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 19:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are great with video game character articles, can you like do something about both the Nurse (Silent Hill) and the Pyramid Head articles? I don't think they should be articles, but I need a second opinion. GamerPro64 (talk) 16:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, is there anything in the way of development information for enemies that isn't already present in their articles/the list? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankies. I was surprised that after two years, it only took a day to save it. :p Admittedly, the new development info did help.

And GLaDOS is decent yeah, but I haven't done any work on the Appearances section and would like to expand the Reception section some more, specifically with some more comparisons to other characters. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure who the hell you think I am, but I made one edit to the page. The hair, she be brown. Movie, game, other game, official render, it is dark brown hair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.44.107 (talk) 06:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kung Fu Man- The only issue left at Talk:Zero (Mega Man)/GA1 are related to the images. As the uploader of the images, could you take a look at File:Zero-mmx.png and File:Zero-mmx.png, and make the necessary adjustments. Once they are taken care of, I'll pass the article. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 18:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hello! I notice on your userpage that you list Nemesis (Resident Evil) as an A-article you contributed to. Please note my workspace at User_talk:A_Nobody/List_of_decisive_battles#Resident_Evil_series. Anyway, would you like to collaborate on getting the most significant characters from the series to DYK class? The two most "notable" female characters would have to be Jill Valentine and Claire Redfield (they appear as playable characters in multiple games, appear in the movie versions, and have multiple toys made of them and therefore we should be able to find sources on their appearances in the games, movies, and as toys) and probably Leon Kennedy and Chris Redfield for the guys (the former appears in the animated movie and the latter as an action figure; both are main characters in multiple games). The others listed on my userfied page have potential, but I can accept them being in the character lists. Jilly, Claire, Leon, and Chris have the greatest likelihood of working as stand alone articles (I wouldn't be surprised if they don't appear in some top ten lists as well, which incidentally, while taking care of an ill family member, I have been going through back issues of Game Informer, Electronic Gaming Monthly, etc. to compile a master list of all of their top ten lists and if you are curious what I have discovered thus far, drop me an email; I figure no one can challenge the reliability of these particular magazines; I have been working with another on this as well as seen at User_talk:A_Nobody/Archive_25#Source_request).

For example, we have something like “the top 10 boss fights,” GameInformer 181 (May 2008): 20, which lists "9 Garrador (Resident Evil 4) Of all the tense battles in the game, there was nothing quite like the sense of being hunted in your first encounter with the vicious Garrador. These berserk and sound-sensitive gladiators could easily tear you apart with their metal claws, so you needed to drive them into a frenzy by ringing nearby bells. We still remember the terror in that brief moment when we realized the Garrador had pinpointed our location and was ready to strike." This listing and commentary could form the basis of a reception section on this character. Now for the plot section of the article on the character, the Bradygames Signature Series Guide devotes all of page 14 (three big paragraphs) specifically to this character and goes beyond just strategy type of information (noting for example the name's meaning ("man with claws"), i.e. we have two print reliable sources that provide out of universe commentary and importance. Next would be to see what kind of development information exists, but for a number of characters beyond Nemesis, we have some good sources out there. Something else to look at is “WTFiction!? Deciphering silly stories” by Jeremy Parish spread out across Electronic Gaming Monthly 221 (November 2007), Electronic Gaming Monthly 222 (December 2007), Electronic Gaming Monthly 223 (Holiday 2007), Electronic Gaming Monthly 224 (January 2008), and Electronic Gaming Monthly 225 (February 2008). Each of the installements devotes at least two full pages entirely to the items on the below list and includes (in the case of the above cited Resident Evil characters listings/commentaries on several characters, locations, weapons, etc.:

• No. 5: Xenogears
• No. 4: Mega Man
• No. 3: Final Fantasy VII
• No. 2: Resident Evil
• No. 1: Metal Gear

Anyway, I think the above are some priority articles and I am inspired after they said in a review of The Darkside Chronicles on X-Play something to the effect of needing to check Wikipedia for all the back story. Also, I received the collector's edition of Resident Evil 5 for Christmas (we give out some gifts early) and it has a DVD documentary bonus figures with all sorts of interviews on the characters, even the non-playable ones like Excella. Please note that I am working with another editor whom you seem friends with on this as well and I am confident he would welcome your help to. For our discussion, please see User_talk:A_Nobody#Resident_Evil. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 19:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion continued at User_talk:A_Nobody#RE:_RE. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 02:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To those who make Good Arguments, who are appreciative, or supportive. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 19:43, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I created it for everyone, really. :V I wonder if I can make a Waluigi article! - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:07, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work all through on MissingNo..

--DavidCane (talk) 18:39, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I added that with the intention of making it less about Haunter and more about the Gastly line. I think that the three of them are similar enough that the contents don't deviate too much. In regard to the specific source, I don't think it really applies in the sense of "mentioning a few handful of Pokémon" as examples; If all they did was mention Gengar as having a strange appeal to him along with Chansey and Cubone that'd be one thing, but they also explain the appeal to him. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's a shame! You were absolutely the best character article creator. I guess I'll have to be more discerning than I used to be with picking out sources! Well, good luck with whatever you're up to next. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concur; you will be sorely missed. Good luck in your future endeavors. Artichoker^[talk] 18:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. Cheers. By the way, happy new year to all of you.Tintor2 (talk) 18:57, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same. You were awesome. Good luck in whatever you are doing. Hope you come back sometime. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 20:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editors come and go, but you will surely be missed. I hope we bump into each other again on the wiki. Take care. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 07:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Best wishes in your futrue endevors and happy New Year! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 16:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A bit late to wish you all the best, but take care of yourself and power to your elbow. Someoneanother 16:24, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Street fighter 2010 j boxart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ff mighty final fight cover nes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wanna help out with this, if you have any spare time? I know that you had your eye on the article too, so I wouldn't like to cut you out of the loop. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They always come back... I tried quitting. Went from the Winter to Summer and then gave in. ~o~ - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you are back? Cool!Tintor2 (talk) 18:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you back. :-D Kind of scary how this place seems to suck us in.

FYI- I picked up The Art of Game Characters over the holidays. It's like Leo Hartas's previous one, The Art of Game Worlds. It focuses more on general character design rather than specific characters, but has a few brief mentions. It has an index if want me to look up some characters. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 05:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Its a little late, but welcome back. Also, you are currently inactive in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Members list. Are you still? GamerPro64 (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI- I finally started work on Lara Croft. Sorry for the long wait, but I hope the content I have will be worth it. I began with the development section and should finish it up over the next few days. From there I'll move to the film appearances and then to the promotion section. If you could work on the design and video game appearances, I'd really appreciate it. Again, sorry for the long wait, but real life has been more pressing than Wikipedia. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 19:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Well, seeing as I contacted you in July 09 about working on the article and didn't start until six and half months later... I guess I should cut you some slack. :-p Take your time. Wikipedia isn't going anywhere, and real life should take precedent.

I should finish up the development and promotion section soon. After that, I'll start piecing together the reception content I have. I noticed the prose's flow is off in some areas. Somethings are referenced once and then again like it's the first time, or different sections don't match up well. Basically the new content will need a good copy edit. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 17:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Once you guys are more or less happy with the prose, I'll be up for a copyedit... it's not world-class, but it's a help, I think :) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 22:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly welcome an extra pair of eyes to review my work. I just don't have the time or ability to give it that extra shine. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 23:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

You have a decent amount of information in the article already, but there may be a few things in this source that you have missed. Arcade Magazine - Issue 1

So far, the article only mentions the word "sex" once, is that realistic? - hahnchen 00:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's an interview in GI about her creation if you don't already know. Need me to give you some of the details? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion on Talk:Mr. Mime about the reliability of the sources from Pokemonofthedaychick. Could you tell them why you think she and possibly other "pokemonoftheday" people are staff or reliable? _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 01:24, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ffiii-nes.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Soulcaliburiv cassandra.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 10:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I think your article was actually good enough and should stay. And I also believe that Taki & Mitsurugi absolutely should have their own articles too. More than Talim etc. Anyway, I approciate your efforts, man. Just don't be so hard on yourself. --Asperchu (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, really, for me it was good enough. And do Taki, too. I just did this in the topic, you can rate this or comment or whatever. Also my other edits too. --Asperchu (talk) 16:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So is there any Taki article and if there is, how to make it better? --Asperchu (talk) 12:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just love how you're ignoring me. --Asperchu (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could it be a FA article, I think it is almost there. You said in a previos FAC that it need a section talking about Development, but do we have the information? Taking into account that the game is from the early 90's is hard to find something in the net. Also a censur section can be sth important to add, but it is hard to find reliable sources. Can you help? OboeCrack (talk) 16:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• You argued that the weren't going to delete, but merge everything as a whole, while I insisted they'd delete most everything in time. There is now a proposal to do just that. [2] Dream Focus 20:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. While waiting for Sonic and the Secret Rings to get a GA review, I've been working on the following article: Digimon Racing. You can probably guess that there isn't much out there about it in terms of RS's. You're experienced in this business, so can you quickly look at it and tell me any glaring changes that need to be made, or just anything you notice? I don't think there would be much point to doing a full peer review. Whatever you can tell me is appreciated. Tezero (talk) 05:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC) Update: It's at peer review now, here. Stop by if you can. Tezero (talk) 03:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware that the Entei article isn't exceptional; that's why it's in a user page. Feel free to make whatever changes you see fit on it or the Latias and Latios article I'm also working on. On the subject of Rayquaza, I opened a merge discussion on its talk page, though I think I could probably find some additional reception if I take the same route that I took with Latias and Latios. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in the case of Unown, I believe that the reviewer meant to say that Unown's nature was to be ambiguous rather than criticizing the movie for being ambiguous with Unown's alignment. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:17, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You posted a screen shot and it looks like you have Prizm as a playable character. If there is a trick (or hack) please let me know. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paula Bunion (talk • contribs) 03:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's me Logicartery your friend from the Soul Calibur times. Just a question, I've seen you on the MobyGames external links discussion regarding the user Larson. Is it really bad to include mobygames link to ELs? I didn't particularly added some but he removed them on one article I'm somewhat adjusting. Which is somewhat disturbing, although I tried reading his intentions.--JCD ^(Talk) 13:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the mean time, hope you like this :D

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he's black. 96.19.212.239 (talk) 02:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Funny enough, I was just thinking of him. It's worth a shot. I may not be so active in the creation, since I'm working on a few articles, but I can help out. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 15:05, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you removed {{Copied}} templates from the Talk pages of Jennifer Mui and Mattias Nilsson (Mercenaries). I previously contacted you at #Template:Copied at Talk:Nemesis (Resident Evil) above. I prefer to keep them even if the copied content has been removed, since it may be restored from the history. If the wording is an issue, I would be happy to work on a template parameter to represent this state. Thanks. Flatscan (talk) 04:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was part of the article when I started working on it, and I agree that it's out of place. The development section would be the best place for it. The source for the "increasingly bloodthirsty" content should be removed along with the two sentences. But without it, the content about feeling guilty in Anniversary doesn't make as much sense. I've meant to try to track down the game source to see how to rewrite that bit as I don't want to just cut and paste. The article is choppy enough in several areas from my edits already. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Oh yeah, I was hoping you could put together a "Design" section that describes the character. I've never written one such section for a character before and believe you could do a much better and quicker job than I could. This IGN article is a good starting point, but feel free to write without sourcing. I guarantee I have print sources to back up any statement you could write from just looking at the character, past and present. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:28, 7 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I addressed the reception bit you mentioned. I'll probably added more from the Arcade: The Videogame Magazine source in "Further reading" and Getting the Girl in "External links". But I'd say the article is good enough for GAN right now, and hopefully FAC afterward. Regardless, I hope you can give it a copy edit to ensure high quality. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 14:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for the help. Appreciate it. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:57, 18 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

FYI- I put the article up for GA. I figured it's far enough along to do well at GAN. I understand that real life is more pressing, but I hope you can give it a copy edit before it goes to FAC.

Also, what are your thoughts on character backstories? Lara Croft's is not described in the article, but there are references to it in other sections. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 14:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hi. I see you've been involved with these. You've had some talk with WölffReik about these, right? I've reverted his last disinterring of several of the character articles. I'm not quite clear on the merge/AfD status on these but believe whatever worthwhile bits have been merged somewhere. I'm open to suggestion as to how we should handle this. Cheers, Jack Merridew 23:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I have reverted again too. Wolff is operating against at least three editors, along with the consensus in the AFD that a stand alone article is inappropriate. But rather than enflaming the discussion further, perhaps we should get a third opinion. Either at the fiction or notability noticeboards, or at the video game wikiproject. 24.114.232.35 (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrapped up copyediting. I looked out for the usual suspects that get crucified at FAC, like additionally/with & while in some usages/including in some usages. I also made the lead more conventional and tried to deal with some overlinking, which I absolutely got hammered for at my last FAC (hah, back then, I didn't realize it could be such an issue). Feel free to revert any of the changes to better represent the source material or improve flow. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 07:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, I submitted The Real Adventures of Jonny Quest to FAC. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 00:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was confused due to all the reverts I did last day with the Fullmetal Alchemist articles so I did not realize I was doing the opposite. And considering that FFVII had to many adult themes like Cid's way of treating his woman or Cloud going to a mansion that has... it does not seem strange that the staff thought of doing that scene.Tintor2 (talk) 16:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No such card made for it? Take a look. • GunMetal Angel 01:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's fan-made? I saw it a long time ago. I guess I thought wrong. • GunMetal Angel 01:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to insist but his name is just Kefka in the ending credits and official English website. Could you tell me where the full name "Kefka Palazzo" appear? Thanks. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The official website and game credits omit EVERYONE'S last name. Once again, do some research before you make hasty decisions in the future.

@Kung Fu Man: thank you for your intervention and moving it back. I'd thought this sort of foolishness confined to FFWiki, I guess I was wrong. The Clawed One (talk) 20:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't played Bloody Roar 2 in nearly 7 years. And since you know a lot about video games could you explain this to me? It's puzzled me for a while. Is it a reference to Sheng Long or not? • GunMetal Angel 02:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was wondering if you could take a look at .hack (video game series) and maybe point out any problems you see. It's at FAC right now, but Jinnai seems to have succeeded in scaring off any other reviewers with his unactionable "Oppose and request speedy close". Thanks for your help, Axem Titanium (talk) 09:30, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Started up a BRD discussion on the talk page here. Please discuss. --Malkinann (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the MOS:JP talk page, a discussion has been started about including or not including romanizations for words of English origin, such as Fainaru Fantajī in Final Fantasy (ファイナルファンタジー, Fainaru Fantajī) (for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics here).

Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties. One suggestion on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.

One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those selected in the process.

What this invitation is:

• You should give feedback on the first suggested compromise and are highly encouraged to provide other solutions.

What this invitation is not:

• This is not a vote on including or excluding such romanizations.
• This is not a vote on compromises either.

It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the MOS:JP talk page and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance. Prime Blue (talk) 11:38, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[3] An interview about Sander Cohen's sexuality. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I am contacting everyone who participated in the previously AFD that Megatron (Beast Era) is up for deletion again. The AFD is at [4] Dream Focus 00:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Rufus - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 17:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I was wondering if we could establish a system - for the SF characters. For instance, I help find the references, and you format them? I'm not familiar with the series enough to really do an article justice, and I'm sure someone with more experience could do better for it. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you get bored after doing one generation? xD I think you should have waited so you could have a time to do it all at once. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 13:11, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, unfortunately; I just kinda assumed the proper translation for what she said through Google Translate (she says it's her favourite). I know a couple people who can read Italian, though I don't know if they'd want to take the time to dig through the book. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 05:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Pokémon Apokélypse, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Apokélypse until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JL 09 ^_q?c 05:25, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Funny that we both used Sheng Long as an argument against deletion :v - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 05:46, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you're not super busy, would you mind doing a once-over on killer7? It's at FAC right now and a good copy-editor is hard to find. Thanks, Axem Titanium (talk) 21:26, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the event that we could establish that the author of this (and other articles of his) is actually written by a biologist, would it be usable? And if not, what would be needed to establish the credentials of a biologist (ie, if he was published or not)? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 05:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A bit late, but I can establish his credentials for you if they're still at all helpful for you. He's the first author on an article entitled "Characterisation of a highly stable α-amylase from the halophilic archaeon Haloarcula hispanica". Just put his name (George Hutcheon) into Google Scholar and it's the very first result you'll get. Mukashi (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you'd want to see if some of the book references used in Haunter and Gengar apply to Gastly? I can't really find anything in them, like the Harry Potter/Pokemon book. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:33, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the only problem with Screw Attack is if it is not published by GT. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 07:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could either tell me if you think that this article could ever have the potential to go to FAC, or better yet if you could help make the push. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jillvalentine-re3c.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 01:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bigdaddy-renders.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do a review in the next day or to since the reviewer seems to be gone. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:56, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:51, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well, do what you will~ - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kung Fu, I started a talkpage thread about possibly pushing Link's Awakening through FAC, although it would need some cleanup.[5] I think that since the development section issues appear to be resolved, it stands a chance this time 'round. Your comments or help would be appreciated. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 16:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop lying. And stop being a *****, too. --94.246.150.68 (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you indicate me please the Wikipedia guideline or policy that prohibits the use of defaultsort on fictional characters? Almost every fictional character uses it. --LoЯd ۞pεth 23:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Characters task force of WP:VG (which, admittedly, is incredibly inactive and literally did nothing) and the only member who actually did something to the talk page, I wondered whether you might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Fictional characters, my proposal on a WikiProject dedicated to fictional characters. Harry Blue5 (talk) 22:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was curious if you wanted to, sometime in the future, help collaborate on improving the SF character articles to a certain standard. As is, M. Bison has obvious notability to be found, but the article is a mess - I would almost suggest completely rewriting almost every single one. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 22:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on the Eddy Gordo article quite a while and would like to start getting second opinions as it continues to grow and expand to a quality article (not there yet I believe, but is getting closer each edit). Since you were the editor who added the Cleanup and Ref needed tags on the page a while back, I seek your opinion on the article and to see whether or not the tags are stil needed. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Darkstalkers-felicia.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:30, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Missingno.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your hard work. May you wear the crowns well, and may the gamepad crown motivate you to press on with more outstanding articles. – SMasters (talk) 09:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I can see why the characters don't really fit onto the template. However, what if we split the characters section into "Home" and "Guest" (or something similar). That way we could fit in all the guest characters without overcrowding the "real" Soul characters? Just a suggestion. Harry Blue5 (talk) 00:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 02:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give it a copy edit? I want to see if I can't get it to GA in less than a couple of days (for lulz). - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 11:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I presume that you have more knowledge of the character, so could you add/fix whatever you can that is missing/wrong in the article? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 11:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your justification for questioning Nintendo's original release date, but where one Earth did the July 1998 re-release date come from? I mean, even the IGN review was done in June of that year and states that its reviewing the re-release copy of the game. How could they be reviewing if it hasn't been released? The RPGamer reference for April seems valid. ~ Hibana (talk) 14:05, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kung Fu Man. I noticed that you are have been more active lately. Have you thought about being active on the Members List again? GamerPro64 (talk) 20:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kano-render.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've found that a lot of good articles and probably a lot of featured articles (I haven't check them yet) are abusing the use of copyrighted images on Wikipedia (for example, I've seen several articles that use three images to visualize content in the article even though the first image demonstrates everything that the other two images are trying to do). Would you be interested in helping fix this problem? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I agree with the merge, so I say you should keep reverting it back until he gets any real notability and not just the fatality stuff, and more than just 9 references for that matter (pretty bad for an almost 20-years old character). --194.145.185.229 (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And well, he HAS his own article. So maybe you get rid of it, and i'll remove the link there. BUT the merging needs work because Kano entry on the list really is a mess. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 14:25, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By "ridding of Noob" I meant redirecting into the list. (And then cleaning up his entry there.) --194.145.185.229 (talk) 14:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and if you care, the list of DOA characters needs a lot of work too. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 14:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about making all of those articles on flimsy information. It's just that when you get going, you just can't stop. Thanks for being my rock! :v From now on I'm just going to worry about cleaning up what we have (and doing my Portal and Bit.Trip articles). - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What happened here? You forgot to merge back its name and characteristics. Why did you not merge the reception? While it relates to Zubat, it is more focused on Woobat being a repeat, not Zubat being repeated. Also, why was Diglet and Dugtrio's reception not merged? _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 03:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kano-render.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She's got no real reception, and the article itself is VERY bad too (like from several years ago), meanwhile I've seen a lot of Asuka Kazama but she has no article. --Barry Sandwich (talk) 13:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also Crimson Viper might be also considered for redirect (maybe). I think Carmen Sandiego (character) should be merged into Carmen Sandiego, because it's totally pointless in this case. --Barry Sandwich (talk) 13:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a discussion has been started about whether {{Infobox VG character}} is appropriate for Pokemon characters. Since I believe you were the one to actually make that decision, I wanted to ask for your comment. Thanks, _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 17:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kung fu, if you have concerns about the classifications of Galatea (video game) discuss them at the talk page instead of indulging in an edit war. And provide valid reasons for deletion; that the article or the "game itself is not fictional, ai nor female" is not a valid one; there are ample precedent for articles not directly about a character being included in Category:Fictional artificial intelligences, but also at Category:Female video game characters. Diego Moya (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

–MuZemike 14:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List all the problems you can see there as of now on her article's talk page and I'll se what I can do it about them.

Also someone (like you) could also add more citation to the storyline and such because there are few of them there. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How about now? --194.145.185.229 (talk) 08:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice you contributed to Talk:Europa Barbarorum during its first GA review, and so I thought you might like to know that I have requested that the article be reviewed for Good Article status again: perhaps you would be interested in contributing this time around, too? It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 22:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tekken-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just saying. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KFM, I was considering nominating MissingNo. for Today's Featured Article and was wondering if it would be okay with you. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:27, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A user who was blocked had been redirecting some Street Fighter character articles such as Sakura Kasugano, Oro and Ibuki, but they are really stub and do not possess too much reception. I took a look at Sakura since it should be the one that more stuff, but after removing some original research, and trimming, the article was still a stub. Do you think they should it be merged once again? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on September 14, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 14, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't see this on the main page... congrats. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 15:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. I think before merging, you should have just brought that up first or something. I didn't even have to look very hard for those sources either, so if I looked harder, I'm sure I could probably find a few more too.

I don't really want to start any war with you either. I just didn't really see anything wrong with that Elena article (or the Lili one, for that matter) and even WP:N doesn't really say anything about "weak reception". Why do you insist on merging these articles so much anyway? If anything, merging does more harm than good and I know other editors here who agree with me. Kokoro20 (talk) 04:46, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop Editing this page! If you edit it, i will block you so why you edit it this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDarkPyrano100 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Abobo's Big Adventure, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wired and Arcade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain your recent change and you comment of "yeah we're not going to do this, there's no vandalism"? Thanks. Stubbleboy 19:56, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded an image of the Simpson's arcade cabinet to Commons under the assumption that the cabinet was free because of utilitarian reasons. But the image was deleted because the artwork on the cabinet was non-free and not utilitarian. Copyrighted material is allowable if it is minimal and incidental to the image's topic. In this case, the artwork is a large chunk of the image and the topic. Something like File:Toby Gard - E3 2005.jpg is fine because the copyrighted material (the poster) is blurred, in the background, and mostly obscured.

The definition is kinda subjective, but I have to agree with Jinnai for this image. In fact, we should probably move similar arcade cabinet images from Commons to Wikipedia. :-\ Not fun, but it's the prudent thing to do. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 00:12, 18 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I am not able to understand why you are against a format which doesnt list the links to other characters just their names? Doesnt this format give more clarity? 65.218.181.189 (talk) 05:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

its not true that template is just a list of all present documents. Look at the templates of Car timelines. They are supposed to inform the duration they have been available. How about keeping the format but listing the characters in their respective lists. So that when other character pages are created then they can be added in their place rather than a mixture of random names. 65.218.181.189 (talk) 05:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the page of the book with the chart listing sales of all the Pokemon games, you can see at the very botton the words "Source: VGChartz.com" Indrian (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I came across some articles which you had apparently merged and redirected in 2008 and which another user has since reverted. The articles I know of are Blaze (Mortal Kombat), Taven, Shujinko, Hsu Hao, Kai (Mortal Kombat), Mokap, Onaga, Havik, Frost (Mortal Kombat) and Daegon, but there may be more. Would you mind looking into them. As far as I can tell, the consensus was that they be merged and redirected, on which basis I reverted the reversions. However, I don't know the full circumstances for the merge and have little idea where to find all the relevant discussions. I discovered these reversions because the reverter neglected to remove the merge tag, causing them to reappear in the merge backlog. Thank you. ClaretAsh 11:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I just saw the discussion at WikiProject Video games. ClaretAsh 11:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I opened a discussion for which Pokémon articles to merge here. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 22:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I placed the article Raiden (Metal Gear) on a peer review some time ago, but got brief responses. Do you have any recommendations? I have doubts regarding whether creation section should be splitted. Also, I noticed that there are other sources commenting more on Raiden's role in in Metal Gear Solid 2 (he represents the player) as well as his actions in following game (how he is a different type of hero from main protagonist Solid Snake) and I was wondering whether it could listed as a sub-section within reception. Any thoughts? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 02:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Little update: I have added a small analysis subsection to the character's reception. It's my first time writing subsection on a reception section, so I wasn't sure whether it was okay or not. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 02:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 02:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:27, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cc-tifa-lockheart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Raiden mkvsdc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was looking to make the template more consistent in the category by moving it to Template:Infobox fighting game character, but I notice that you reverted a similar move just over a year ago. What happened to break those articles? --Izno (talk) 01:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kay, I'll look into it and hopefully not step on too many double RDs. If you see other problems after I've performed and cleaned up the move, let me know. --Izno (talk) 11:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will edit after you, but without you there will probably never be a good cleanup like that. You've actually made a positive change there so come on and finish what you've started. --Niemti (talk) 06:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you'll reconsider. --Niemti (talk) 07:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I'm gonna do it myself. --Niemti (talk) 14:09, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.supanova.com.au/guest/jennifer-hale/

They made it up? Just like the personal-life details about her "hanging out with her friends and family, riding horses, rock climbing or volunteering"? They obviously talked to her before organizing this meeting with "all her fans".

The IMDb listing, as officially authorized by herself, is just an additional confirmation.

Your unreasonable doubt seems to be based solely on someone writing something about some "union" on Wikipedia. --Niemti (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, all commercial merchandise is developed to sell it and further profit, not to "promote a character". I don't know where you got such an outlandish idea, but simply speaking you're completely wrong.

Konami Battle was an official Konami event (so you shouldn't compare to anything at GameFAqs), and most of all shows how Konami chose her in first place as one of their 64 best characters ever, which was then affirmed by Konami fans, too.[6] --Niemti (talk) 08:41, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you have removed some categories I've added to character pages that redirect to Characters in The Legend of Zelda series. I thought they were OK: it seems identical to the Coyote/Roadrunner example under Redirects whose target title is incompatible with the category. I think one could also argue its useful as subtopic categorization or categorization of list entries. However, there does seem to have been discussion about similar issues in the past. Therefore I thought it might be worth seeing if we could agree on the best course of action. You are obviously much more experience than me, so I was hoping you would be willing to share a little expertise. — BobQQ (talk) 12:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kung Fu Man, I see that you have listed yourself as a contact for Nintendo Power articles at the WP:VG Reference Library and I was wondering if you could help me get hold of the article on Road Blasters (from Nintendo Power, Issue 10, January/February 1990). If it's not too bothersome then I could use a scan, a text-transcription, a summary or anything else that is convenient for you. If you're too busy, no problem. Thanks in advance. -Thibbs (talk) 22:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Projectsoullogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is tehre anything there behind-the-scenes on the other Tyrants? --Niemti (talk) 17:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You tell me what is realiable then. That site is maintained by people who are into video game music, and etc. But ok, maybe one day someone will add a truly "reliable" source. Let's wait. --Hydao (talk) 04:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MistyEP.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SSFVega.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Niemti (talk) 19:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1UP and Gamespy are going too this year.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to comment on a user conduct discussion regarding Niemti, which can be found here. If you comment there you may wish to review the rules for user conduct comments first. You are receiving this notification because you were previously involved in dealing with this user. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mean, like UGO's Man Handsome[7], or IGN's Abdul Alhazred[8]? --Niemti (talk) 10:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SC-ivy-iv.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are repeatedly defacing the "Poison" article by adding a transphobic slant, then claiming "censorship" when your content is removed. If you have concerns, please take them to the talk page rather than further blind RVing. Awk (talk) 07:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 05:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello; I'd like to remind you, please double-check to make sure your edit summary matches the actual content of your edit. Here, you reverted back quite a few changes while claiming in the edit summary to be making only a small tweak. --Fran Rogers (talk) 05:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tetris-box.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Finalfight2box.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mk monks reptile render1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MK4-Reptile.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, hope you're doing well. I wanted to alert you to this edit on Missingno. which introduces some reasonable content backed up by a reliable source. Obviously though, it definitely needs some copyediting, ref formatting, etc. to bring it up to par with the rest of the article, as well as scouring that source for more possible information to ensure the article remains comprehensive. I can try to take a look at it sometime this week/early next week when I get some time, but I thought you might like to take a stab at it when you get a chance. I'd really like to preserve the FA quality on this great article. Cheers, Artichoker^[talk] 03:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello; you reverted my recently-made (29.4.2015) edits to the MissingNo. article. (I made this account in order to contact you.) Did I understand correctly that if there's no video footage (or other such verifiable evidence) of Shigeki Morimoto's interview, then what he said about 190 Pokémon originally being designed is not allowed to be posted on Wikipedia? It's quite obvious and – to my knowledge – generally accepted that this is why there are exactly 39 index values of MissingNo. (151+39 = 190), interspersed between valid Pokémon's index values. This information logically progressed to the main point of my edit, which was to point out that only some of the nonexistent Pokémon are MissingNo. – the remaining indexes (0 and 191–255) are occupied by other glitch Pokémon such as h POKÉ, 'M, PC 4 SH, 94, ゥ$ 6ゥ, etc. The current state of the article is misleading, as (although it doesn't explicitly say so,) it implicitly makes the reader assume that all invalid Pokémon are MissingNo..

I assume you also know that Missingno. exists in Yellow every bit as much as it does in Red and Blue. Would citing a Youtube video of Missingno. being encountered in Pokémon Yellow be considered a valid source, or how would I go about proving this for the purposes of the article?

--Selvydra (talk) 09:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sonyablade-render.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]