This is an archive of past discussions with User:Non-dropframe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
No problem. Your mistake was having a "}" in place of a ")" But I must admit that I had a good laugh at the irony. A tagging mistake in a computer language article. Anyway, happy to help, Non-dropframe (talk) 22:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Hangon gone in 30 sec.
Please explain why my <hangon> tag was deleted within 30 seconds of my protest. I hoped there would be some discussion and I feel that my speedily deleted article on 'Shared reality' was a valid entry. Thanks.
Hey, I have no power to delete files and only nominated your page for deletion. An administrator agreed with my reasoning and thusly deleted the page. By the way, please sign your talk page posts with Thanks, Non-dropframe (talk) 23:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
So you nominated my Hangon page or my article for deletion?
I started a topic - which is valid and I posted credible references. I have worked in this area of research for over 10 years and calling it spam & nn is insulting. My software development supports and validates this research along with my SRED tax credits. Thanks.ShuttleSpace (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
You are the vandal. You have erased my work to transform the article, which is now perfectly referenced, into something which is a stub susceptible to be erased. Hektor (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
It hasn't been erased, it's in a previous revision. Check the article history. Further, you may not remove Speedy Deletion templates from articles you have deleted yourself. No amount of editing you do allows you to remove it. If it is up to par by the time an admin reviews it, the template will be removed. --Non-dropframe (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't need to say it, I have rewritten the article and sourced it. So although University of California copied the NASA bio, since the article has not any more any common word with it there is no issue. Hektor (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
The issue here isn't the valadity of the tag, it's that you removed it; an improper way of going about things. Be patient and let things work the way they're supposed to. --Non-dropframe (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I have been patient, and the article has been deleted. The administrator obviously did not care about my hangon or if the article had been edited to make it ok. That is exactly what I feared. Could you be so kind to send a message to explain as the nominator to the administrator that I tried my best and removed any copyright infringement from the article ?Hektor (talk) 08:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to inform you that WP:NOT violations are not speedy criteria. I've removed the recipe but it is still possible for there to be a valid article. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Non-dropframe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
