User talk:Nucleus hydro elemon

Hi, I saw you put a number in the table at List of gases. The symbol |- means the start of a new row in the table. But for negative numbers we use a special unicode symbol − which is slightly longer than the hyphen -. To get a negative number in a table, just copy this symbol from another number there. Or from here if you want to. I use the math and logic symbols inert tool in my editor screen. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you able to read the sources for Cobalt hydride in Russian? I cannot find anything to read online about this substance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know language of Russia.Nucleus hydro elemon 12:56,13 March 2020(UTC)

How did you know what it said in order to use it as a cited source when writing the article? DMacks (talk) 03:55, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I purely translating without see references when I do this.Nucleus hydro elemon 02:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there again. We are looking at Polonol article. The sources you supply do not appear to mention Polonol or any compound with RPoH in it. Is this your own theoretical ideas? Do you have any better source for this? Join in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry#Polonol

I have since found out it is a translation of a Chinese article that has since been deleted. So my questions are probably unanswerable by you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

However, assuming that it was a translation from Chinese-wikipedia, you did not mention that fact when you uploaded it here to English-wikipedia, which is against policy both here and there (violates authorship/content-attribution license). Please check your other previous contributions to make sure you have cited your source material, and pay attention to this important rule in the future. DMacks (talk) 00:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Polonol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to exist: see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry#Polonol

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Capewearer (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Uploading translated versions of other language wikipedia articles without citing them is not allowed. DMacks (talk) 09:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To give credit when translating a Wikipedia page like Rubidium cyanide from zh:氰化銣 you must leave some kind of message. You can put a note on the bottom of the page giving the attribution of the link to the page, or you can use the translated page template, for example: {{Translated page|zh|氰化銣}} Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polonol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polonol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nucleus hydro elemon

Thank you for creating Dysprosium(III) fluoride.

User:Blythwood, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

A citation in English would be good. I've added relevant categories.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Blythwood (talk) 13:37, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nucleus hydro elemon, or fan of fluorine,

I see you are creating lots of stubs about binary compounds. It would be good if you can learn some standard English ways to write about the chemicals. When you write about now the make the chemical you are often using the passive form, followed by a verb that says how. The right way to do this is (form of the verb be) (past participle) (by)—for example:

W can be produced by .....ing 
Z is produced by heating X with Y

Don't use "was" or past tense, unless you are talking about something that happened once in the past. You might use past tense when you describe the discovery.

Also punctuation like commas have a space character after then in English. eg you should write ..."P₂Cl₄, first synthesized"... The same spacing applies to ; : and . I hope to see you write some more good pages in the chemistry field. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nucleus hydro elemon

Thank you for creating Nitrate radical.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for getting this started. Needs work. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now I think nitrate radical will redirect to nitrogen trioxide(I try to name it this,but it redirected to N₂O₃)Nucleus hydro elemon,01:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that nitrate radical and nitrogen trioxide are the same topic, so one should redirect to the other ((WP:CONTENTFORK)). "Nitrate radical" is the term used in the titles of the cited references in both articles. But our nitrogen trioxide article seems more complete, containing most/all the details in the nitrate radical article with clean writing. The nitrate radical arcticle has much less content and is just a translation from another language's WP article that hasn't been cleaned up to meet the basics of spelling, grammar, etc for a native-English speaker or WP MOS. Should I just move nitrogen trioxide to nitrate radical and leave the latter as a redirect? Or is there any of the current content in nitrate radical that is worth saving? @Jorge Stolfi and Graeme Bartlett: thoughts? You two worked on the fuller but newer article. DMacks (talk) 02:35, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: No objection. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 01:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem that nitrate radicalhas about 3 times more use on Google scholar than nitrogen trioxide, and many of these uses are for dinitrogen trioxide. So I agree that nitrogen trioxide should be moved to the title nitrate radical. I don't think there is any text there worth preserving, so we can just move with a delete target. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: would you like to use your magic buttons for it, or should I:) ?DMacks (talk) 14:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The move is completed. Wikidata remains linked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you link names, it is a good idea to see what the target is about, eg Kryptonium is not the topic for KrH+. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ytterbium hydride, you may be blocked from editing. Half of this article is completely incoherent and has broken references (national rugby union team???). You are not remembering to WP:PREVIEW, leaving a mess for others to clean up often. It seems like English is not your native language, which is obviously okay, but it means you should slow down a lot and not merely keep dumping poorly-translated articles from Chinese here on the English wikipedia site. DMacks (talk) 16:01, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chlorine perchlorate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you seem to be ignoring my request on punctuation and grammar. Surely putting spaces after commas and full stops is not difficult. Any way I will give you some other pointers on chemical article writing. When you use the verb "solve" I think that you really mean "dissolve". Use "with similar properties to other ..." (rather than "as"). But you would say "the same crystal structure as ...". The DSD data is very outdated, and replaced with GHS data for over 10 years. So don't use Rphrases or sphrases, use pphrases and hphrases instead. Template:Chembox Structure has more parameters for the space group and unit cell that you can use. These include | SpaceGroup = and | LattConst_a = .

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. It pains me to have to make this warning, but you have repeatedly failed to cite your sources when making translations from other-languages' wikipedia articles, as when you created caesium sulfide. You are being disrepectful to the authors of those articles, violating the license of their content, and violating the terms of service here on English Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 03:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid the problem, you must give an attribution on the page, or the talk page saying where you translated the page from. See what I added to the bottom of the caesium sulfide page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the attribution in the scandium hydroxide article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graeme Bartlett (talk • contribs) 22:23, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 02:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued to do this (see thulium(III) hydroxide abd terbium(III) hydroxide) despite several warnings. Further, User:MB has noted that what you are contributing contains total nonsense references because you have not bothered to look at the results to see if templates are behaving the way you mean. And I also observe that Thulium(III) hydroxide contains scientific nonsense because you are cut-and-pasting from different pages than you intend. The block here is for the unattributed content, exascerbated by the content mistakes that are taking lots of editors' time to fix to the barest level of acceptability. I look forward to a change of behavior and improved content once this block is over.

Hi, I think those hand-drawn images you are putting in articles are bad quality. How about you learn to use Inkscape to make a .svg file that is neat at least. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But, how to use Inkscape in mobile phone? Nucleus hydro elemon (here is the talk page) 13:15, 31 July 3020(UTC)

The easiest way may be to ask someone else to draw the diagram. The .svg format is much better than .jpg for chemical diagrams, as it has no compression artifacts. It can be simply zoomed in, and easily edited, different language text in the image can be simply changed. Most recently I have been using a text editor vim to edit .svg's, but unless you know the meaning of the markup, it will be tough! Yet another way to get a diagram is to download it from a public domain image source, such as on the PubChem website. .png format is OK, but not as flexible as .svg. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The image you uploaded has been replaced with a more normally drawn structure. LeticiaLL (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Graeme Bartlett, those two templates deliver similar information. Would you think about merging them? -- Ktsquare (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the Sarin page ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarin ) under History -> Use as a weapon -> 1995 it says that twelve people died. However the Tokyo subway sarin attack page ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_subway_sarin_attack ) says that the death count was changed to 14 after a survey in 2008 and a recent death in 2020. The reason I am reaching out instead of making the changes myself is because quite frankly, I have no idea what I'm doing and would rather not mess it up. 73.195.23.163 (talk) 17:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept this note as an invitation to participate in the discussion of this latest FAC nomination for the nonmetal article.

The context is that you were involved in the FAC 3 discussion for the article (which was not prompted) or you are an editor who made a recent edit to the nonmetal article.

Thank you. Sandbh (talk) 07:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I invite you reading my reply on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Interwiki_conflicts/Unresolved/2022#Category:Natural_tryptamine_alkaloids_(Q15369362)/Category:Natural_tryptamine_alkaloids_(Q8668666) ; feel free to add your comment there if required, or revert my merge if you’re sure I did a mistake.

Sincerely yours, 2A02:2788:228:93D:7CB5:B8E:93E2:A1D6 22:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Elemental Barnstar
		Your work is highly appreciated! Double sharp (talk) 04:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ZNaturforsch has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A comment to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1237764314: it is sad that almost nothing is known for the 6⁺ state of ²⁴⁸Bk. Not its alpha half-life, nor its beta half-life, not even the energy level of the 1^- state. And considering that the discovery of this isotope was almost 60 years ago... 103.166.228.86 (talk) 00:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So far, I found nothing that revise the half-life or denying the existence of this ²⁴⁸Bk state. This and ²⁵⁰Cm are the two nuclides that I want to know more about... Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 08:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wish we knew anything at all about ²⁴⁸Pu and ²⁵²Cm. :) Double sharp (talk) 10:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They can be crashed out from ¹⁹⁷Au + ²³²Th transfer reaction.^[1] I'm waiting for someone attempting this. :) Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 12:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many reactions to try! ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 12:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

²⁵⁰Cm is indeed also an interesting nuclide: we should have used it as a target in the possible reaction ²⁵⁰Cm + ⁴⁸Ca → ^294,295Lv + 3n,4n. As for now ²⁹⁴Lv and its decay products are still unconfirmed (and I believe that this situation has lasted for nearly ten years), and ²⁹⁵Lv and its decay products are completely unknown. 129.104.241.231 (talk) 08:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still waiting for 2n channels giving ²⁹⁴Lv and ²⁹⁵Ts, plus pxn channels to give more neutron-rich superheavies from ⁴⁸Ca reactions. :) Double sharp (talk) 13:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

​Side reactions of ²⁴⁸Cm + ⁴⁸Ca shows great potential. :)^[2] Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit. FYI: here is how a compound can be easily made and rare. Me2C=CMe2 easily adds to BH3 sources and hardly anyone does this reaction, so its a rarely encountered compound.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Beryllium retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]