User talk:Puddleglum2.0/Archive 9
WikiCup 2021 March newsletterRound 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews. Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cerrón Grande Reservoir and Talk:Gela on "Geography and places" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hooks Island on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Aramburu Island on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Martensdale, California on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing DriveHey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Berwind, Colorado on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Administrators' newsletter – April 2021News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021). ![]()
Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Washington Heights, Manhattan on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Counter-Vandalism UnitI was wondering if you could teach me about counter vandalism?
ChromiumOverload (talk) Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Banjarbaru on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Darnestown, Maryland on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Waterloo Park, Norwich on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Queens on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Berbera on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hamilton, Baltimore on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Henderson Hall Historic District on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at WikiCup 2021 May newsletterThe second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures. Our top scorers in Round 2 were:
Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Santa Clarita, California on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Administrators' newsletter – May 2021News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021). ![]()
Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Potomac River on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Palangka Raya on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Stuttgart on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vellar River (Northern Tamil Nadu) on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Palestinian enclaves on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Serengeti National Park on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Center Square/Hudson–Park Historic District on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bremer Marine Park on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tennessee on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bean Station, Tennessee on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request ServiceHi Puddleglum2.0! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months. In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months. You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way. Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you!
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at Administrators' newsletter – June 2021News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021). ![]()
GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at WikiCup 2021 July newsletterThe third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:
In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia