User talk:Pyrotec/Archive11Q4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Pyrotec. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

You reviewed the above article some time ago at the request of myself. I have made the occasional edit here and there to the article, but I have ultimately come to the end of what I can actually think of doing short of a proper overhaul of the article. I popped into the Central Library to harvest information from the Statistical Accounts of Scotland; unfortunately to my dismay Westhill did not feature in the newest edition. Any help and advice would be greatly appreciated, Thanks (I also hope I put this request in the correct place, haha) Eeveeman (talk) 21:49, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Hi hope your well, I need to pick your brains. I have nominated the above having been tweeking it here and there since you awarded GA status back in September. I have had a few issues raised all of which I have addressed except for one.

I have been questioned about the reliability of four sources and need your rational for deeming these reliable sources during GAN.

They are this, this? this? and this?

If your able to give me this then that would be great as I feel it's just this point stopping it from becoming a possible FA -- All the best Cassianto (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I think the referencing issues are getting under control, but the article has not received many reviews so far at FAC. If you have any time to review the article (several changes have been made since you saw it previously) and [Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Stanley Holloway/archive1 comment here], it would be much appreciated. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi! Since you were the person who had done GA-review of Tiruchirappalli, I wish to bring it to you notice that I had submitted the article for a peer-review as a step towards taking it to FA-class. I invite you to give your comments.-Ravi_{My Tea Kadai} 15:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History