User talk:Sgerbic/Archives/2021/11

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Sgerbic. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

FYI, there is an ANI thread at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Havana_syndrome_and_guerilla_skeptics that is relevant to you. MrOllie (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you.Sgerbic (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Sgerbic (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Skeptic's Toolbox has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 15:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

The article NZ Skeptics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability asserted by sources, almost entirely SPS or partisan.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 15:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

The article Taner Edis has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 15:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taner Edis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taner Edis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Santacruz ⁂ Please tag me! 23:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)