User talk:Smart Nomad

 :-)

Please stop re-instating this link. It is being rightfully removed by the bot across a wide variety of pages. If you want to get approval for this link to be used, I suggest you flesh out your arguments at User_talk:XLinkBot#Links. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really suggest that you stop inserting that external link for now, and get consensus on talkpages. There are several editors now that disagree with that link, so clearly there is no consensus for its inclusion (and, per the external links guideline, the burden is on you who wants to include the link). Please get consensus on talkpages now first. Repeated pushing of the link amounts to edit warring, and that is certainly not constructive. Thanks! --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 15:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, that in this sequence of edits, you do pass the bright red line of 3 reverts (which could lead to an immediate block). I'll let it go for now, but please consider yourself warned. As I said, edit warring is not going to get that link in, let discussion get to consensus on the talkpages (e.g. on Talk:Tatars. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 15:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• And at User_talk:XLinkBot#Links, since even if consensus emerged to include it, XLinkbot will still remove it. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft: probably not, I think this user account will be autoconfirmed by now. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 15:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Tatars. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• And now you are edit warring again, now at the Bulgars article [1][2]. You've been blocked before for edit warring. You know this is wrong. You know what to do instead, and if you somehow don't you should read up at WP:DR. Edit warring will not get you what you want. STOP doing this. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:31, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[3] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Bulgar language. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[4] Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Bulgar language. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:42, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Cuman people has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:46, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ukrainians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kipchak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cuman people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ragusa and Alan

Delhi Sultanate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kipchak

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Khazar (talk) 02:11, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about, edit warring? Excuse me? I did not break the three revert rule, not even close. I explained everything on the noticeboard, something you didn't do. Smart Nomad (talk) 13:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! How relevant do you think it is to the biography of John Komnenos Asen that the ancestors of the Asen dynasty to which he is narrowly linked may have been Cuman? I don't consider this a fact relevant to this article — the origins of the Asen dynasty should be discussed only in Asen dynasty and in other places where possible ethnic origins somehow make a difference.

From your edits, it seems to be an agenda of yours to tag articles with some reference to the Cuman people, without much regard to improving the quality of the article itself. Unless you can defend the inclusion with some strong arguments, I intend to remove it from the article. Best regards, — Toдor Boжinov — 21:16, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No agenda at all, just wanted to add accuracy. I have not worsened the quality of the article. I removed it. Kind Regards Smart Nomad (talk) 21:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the understanding! — Toдor Boжinov — 22:22, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cumans may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The Cuman-Kipchaks never established a state, instead forming a Cuman-Kipchak confederation ([[Cumania]]/Desht-i Qipchaq/Zemlja Poloveckaja(Polovcian Land)/Pole Poloveckoe(Polovcian Plain)<ref>
• Princes: Dynastic Cults in Medieval Central Europe. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-42018-0.], p.439.</ref><ref>István Vásáry (2005) ''Cumans and Tatars'', Cambridge University Press, p.99.</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dorman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Braničevo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Smart Nomad,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Hello, Smart Nomad. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 05:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smart Nomad. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 22:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smart Nomad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smart Nomad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smart Nomad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]