User talk:Tkynerd/Archive1

Thank you so much for changing the link of "English" on the Dakota Prairie High School page. I didn't spend enough time checking my links, I guess.

Thanks - you (very properly) corrected the link to "English" on the Laurie London page - I've now done the same with the "German" link. I'm still amazed that anybody actually read such an obscure item!

Mike Hamilton

Thanks for your message on my talk page about the above - you do a lot of great work on the disambiguation stuff -

Mike Hamilton

you are very stubborn, why did you revert the topic of American passport? US is the centre of the world, American basically don't need visa to visit other countries in the world. Even though rogue nations (or evil nations)like China, Russian speaking countries set the rule of visa application for US citizens, Americans will surely receive the visa from these inferior nations by just going to the embassy only. 70.52.75.136 21:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're telling me I'm stubborn? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Your assertions about the US being the center (note correct spelling) of the world are just silly, and your description of China, Russia and India as "rogue nations" is equally silly. It is not that easy for a US citizen to obtain a visa to visit Russia, for example; I know because I investigated the requirements while I was living in Sweden. Regardless, you are ignoring my main point, which is that you are simply removing this information from Wikipedia rather than ensuring that it is preserved in a different location. If you really do not think it belongs in this article, place it in a more appropriate article or create a new appropriate article, but do not simply remove it. This discussion belongs on the talk page at United States passport and I will continue it there if you respond to this. --Tkynerd 21:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest ("fascination", as you put it) with the article and helping to catalyze its improvement. It was my goal when I sat down and created it in January to write an article that would ultimately be encyclopedic, well-sourced, NPOV, but above all a good read. (I got a similar compliment shortly after its creation, too). I appreciate your interest and help.

How did you get led over to it, might I ask? There are still fairly few pages that link to it. Daniel Case 03:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you should say that Dogpatch USA led you to it ... since that's a featured article, I looked it over as my model for what the Action Park article should be since I remembered its spin on the Main Page (One would not expect "Defunct amusement parks" to be a category especially ripe for FA generation, but never underestimate the power of some determined Wikipedians, especially the two guys from Arkansas who did the hard work there). I think Action Park is the best in that category after Dogpatch.

It can mostly be a bittersweet one to write about, I think ... especially when things remain standing after the park has closed (You may, in that vein, want to check out, in person as well as online, Jungle Habitat, another Weird NJ favorite from northwestern NJ). But Action Park was a fun story to tell ... I didn't expect to write so much on it, really.

Dogpatch, by contrast, is sad ... it's amazing they were able to keep that place going so long after not only Li'l Abner, but Al Capp himself, were gone (the real problem was that, by 1968, Capp had become a crusty old reactionary (which showed in the strip, badly) and the strip had jumped the shark in that it was never likely to find a new generation of readers).

I surfed around that category as well, and also found out about Opryland USA's demise that way ... seems they were ultimately doomed by a poor choice of location.

Seems that the category has grown since January. Daniel Case 16:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's another problem with defunct amusement parks ... if they died a long time ago, there's not going to be anything on the web, really. New Jersey had some really small places, even below the Jungle Habitat radar, that are long gone that wouldn't show up. (Nothing comes up for Six Gun City, another place I remember from the White Mountains of New Hampshire that's probably long gone. (Except that it's [apparently still around. Maybe we should have a defunct amusement parks project ... after all, we have this.

I say start the article, and use that little post as a reference. I don't think anyone would mind. If someone marks it for deletion, let me know and I'll try to argue for it.

Actually, that ad isn't even the one I remember most ... later on they got more professional, rewrote the jingle a bit and it sounded better. Daniel Case 18:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just let it grow. That's the idea. Somebody will eventually take an interest in expanding it who has the knowledge. Or you might get a chance to do some research down in that area of LA (Try calling any of the local newspapers or libraries ... they might have some archives they could copy for you (for a nominal fee, of course)).

For my part, I have an email in to Weird NJ to ask Joanne Austin if she'd let me share her research material (Since I live in a county bordering Sussex, I could perhaps go down to Newton myself and look through similar archives, but that's an extravagance in time I can't affford right now). Daniel Case 04:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw that get removed. It seems we're going through another one of our great rounds of copyright paranoia (I spent much of today arguing against the idea of deleting most pictures of living people that are currently in use but not free-use on the grounds that a replacement free-use image could theoretically be created, or the creators of such images under fair use could be persuaded to change their licensing).

And as far as YouTube is concerned, I tend to agree. A lot of people had been linking to some severe copyvio material there ... music videos, whole episodes of TV shows, and it's been EL policy for a long time to not link to copyvio material (notice that song articles don't have links to lyrics pages).

I think you may be right about copyright being expired, but GAR may not necessarily be the current copyright owner. It may be the ad agency (if they used one, which I doubt). And the copyrights are an asset that might have been acquired by Intrawest along with the property.

I'll take that to the guy who did the deleting later. Daniel Case 01:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For now I have restored the reference indirectly. Daniel Case 14:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have it there for now because it's the only pic in the article. I just got Weird NJ, Vol. 2 for Christmas, which has the Action Park logo in the section on it, and I will try eventually to make an SVG reproduction of it. Daniel Case 02:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Moved from my user page)

Thank You. --Indie.Bones 16:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)Indie.Bones[reply]

You're welcome! I hope you don't mind that I moved your comment to my talk page; it really doesn't belong on my main user page. Happy editing! --Tkynerd 16:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a minute. Aren't you the one who defended The Kinslayer when I moved Lego Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy to LEGO Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy? Well, yeah, actually. It was mentioned on the Talk Page that somebody should do something about it via copy+paste and I made myself that someone.

The Kinslayer was really nasty with you about that ("there's a difference between being bold..." or something like that). I replied to him or her, but if you look carefully, my reply was not a defense. Check out what it links to. :-) --Tkynerd 17:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just about okay. It loads now (very very slowly so they've probably still got a server problem) but the page has way too many adverts for a normal "reference" and for example won't be allowed at the open directory for that reason. I haven't searched to find the same content on a better page but it might be worth it --BozMo talk 16:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've never been welcomed:

Welcome!

Hey, Tkynerd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like the site and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful (some of them may sound stupid, but I recommend you check them out):

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• The Sandbox — A great place to experiment
• WP:Village pump — A good place for help

While editing, please remember:

• Be Bold, but not reckless in updating pages
• No personal attacks: be upset with the contributions, not the contributor

You should introduce yourself here at the new user log. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name, the date, and the time.

For your first edits, I suggest searching for articles that you think might interest you. You could also be audacious and try a random page.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome and happy editing! Cbrown1023 23:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for linking english language to ...first do no harm & bataan - cheers Australian Matt 00:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha no worries, I only changed it because it stuck out as being unnecessary but I don't mind either lol. LibLord 22:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tim, Thanks for the edit in the Matt Bardock page. --Cyril Thomas 01:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I actually wanted them to point to Canadian English. I'll fix it. Kevlar67 03:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I changed my mind about that. Since Canadian English as a dialect has only really evolved in the last ~150 years it would be inappropriate to link to it from the pre-confederation colonies, especially BC which wasn't traditionaly part of "Canada" (i.e. Central Canada). Thanks, anyway. Kevlar67 20:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have finally gotten around to fixing up the automation for language entries. If you now enter a single language, the template will first search for the entry "{{{common_languages}}} language". So if you enter simply "English", the infobox will now show [[English language|English]]. This only works of just ONE language is used. - 52 Pickup 08:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. If you find any words like "you", "I", "we", "our", "your" etc they are supposed to be removed. I dont personally think it is too critical but if we dont remove it, someone else will later anyway.--Filll 22:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you see unblocked accounts doing this, please list them on WP:AIV, otherwise all we could do it sprotect pages, the ones you last listed are generally not good candidates for protection though. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! That vandalism is commited by sockpuppets of Cplot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who has been banned for being a troll. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Cplot for a incomplete list. There is an investigation going at 68.30.65.203 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log). It has been suggested to semi protect the Village Pump talk page, but it was turned down because anonymous users may have inquiries. As you can see from the history of those pages, the user now only vandalizes with accounts, meaning we have effectively blocked all his IPs. We are likely to keep the soft blocks going until the investigation is done. Don't worry, just revert the added comments, as usually these sockpuppets are blocked even before you click "edit this page" in the AIV page :-) Thanks for helping! -- ReyBrujo 04:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had a copyright violation on my article "Martin Schippert", that the source book's author Willi Wottreng said to me. I therefore had to shorten the article you helped correcting/writing. I'm sorry if there were any of your words beeing cut away.

Please do not reconstruct the article to its former size, because I else have to fear legal problems against myself.

Thanks for your understanding Martin "FritzZorn" Ulrich

When helping out with links to disambiguation pages, just go for it, regardless of who has "adopted" it -- any help is appreciated! You really don't need to ask permission to do this sort of maintenance -- I'm sure anyone would love to have your help! I think that made sense, if it didn't, you can contact me at my talk page. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 03:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It seems that you were caught in the middle of an edit war. Kshatriya Grandmaster 01:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you might see it being changed back and forth. When people are in edit wars, they don't seem to think much. Don't concern yourself with it though, I'll see to it. Kshatriya Grandmaster 01:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've got all of these now. You might want to go over them just to check. --Barberio 17:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Thanks again. As I say, I'll go over them and dab as many links as I can this evening. (CorHomo makes things so fast that I should be able to get through them pretty quickly.) I'll check both Enabling act and Enabling Act for incoming links. --Tkynerd 17:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The main crux of my problem with that is i admit i was wron gand acknowledge that on the talk pages and I object to some other user who was not editing at the time coming along a placing a warning on my talk page that is why i removed them. I am aware it i bed etiquete but i viewed the warnings as Unconstructive as TStein just placed the warnings there wih no interaction with me at all on either the talk page of the article or on my talk page.--Lucy-marie 02:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you asked for input on the Help desk, I'm giving it to you.

• "Persons" is correct English, as was explained to you multiple times.
• You engaged in personal attacks at the RfC. That's not acceptable.
• You repeatedly made edits to Person that you knew were controversial.

Frankly, I think TStein was extraordinarily restrained in his or her comments. And contrary to what you seem to think, there is no obligation to engage in dialogue before placing a warning on someone's user talk page; it is common not to do so, in fact. Also, I have been unable to find anywhere at Talk:Person where you acknowledged that you were wrong about this issue, so I can understand why TStein still thought there was a danger you would perform those edits again. --Tkynerd 02:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, a lot. Yea, I make stupid mistakes like that. The word missing was cold. Actually, I could use your opinion on something. I'm considering nominating this for Featured List Candidates. Do you think I should? Hurricanehink (talk) 02:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. Thanks anyway. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will once the other one is finished. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree with your interpretation of what 1900s means, according to the MOS, it is specifically a decade. Thus changing the titles to 20th century, etc. was appropriate for Wikipedia. -- Flyguy649 03:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Response to post on my talk page) From the above MOS link, "18th century or eighteenth century (Note: century is not capitalized, and "1700s" is not a century, but a decade)". That said, it's obvious what is meant in this article. I leave it to you. Regards, Flyguy649 03:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added the tag because the page was already semi-protected. I just simply put the tag in to save the time of others. When I clicked on "edit this page," it said that it had been semi-protected so that only established users can protect it. Do I still need to remove it if it's already protected? Acalamari 01:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No apology needed. Thanks for contacting me about it anyway. Acalamari 01:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if you dont have any special to do you can wikify Olidna Borggren or Jenny ulivng or Marie Plosjö/matrix17

Sure! Just got out of bed, right now I'm sitting here doing disambiguation work, but when I'm done, I'll take a look at them. PS You know you can sign your posts with four tildes, like this: ~~~~, don't you? --Tkynerd 14:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanx;) good t hear that their are nice persons here, thanks for the advice to/matrix17

Sir, will you please wikify the entry "padala" here at wikipedia. Will you please arrange the references and footnotes. I am new to wikipedia and just dont know how to do it. Thanks

User:DavidandMarySue

Hi, I noticed you have been to the article. how did you get there? random page? just curious. Galf 13:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Actually, that is an issue...Any idea on how to get the accent on lágrimas? in portuguese it makes the sound change from lahgrymus to lagreemus long e sound in the middle. Do u speak IPA?Galf 14:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

for answering my question at the help desk. ${\displaystyle \sim }$ Lenoxus " * " 14:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I would have linked it, but its very name contains the template address for {{Uncategorized}}, and is therefore absurdly hard to link to, so you'll just have to find it yourself, I'm afraid. -- ${\displaystyle \sim }$ Lenoxus " * " 17:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hal! I just reverted a change at Jackson, Mississippi; the change was to alter "Battle of Champion Hill" to "Battle of Champion's Hill". I find that Battle of Champion's Hill redirects to the main article on the battle. As a native Mississippian, I have never heard Champion Hill referred to as "Champion's Hill" before. Do you know anything about this? Thanks. --Tkynerd 17:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

I have heard that usage, but it's old. It's an example of evolving usage, accelerated by silly US Gov policies to shun apostrophes in place names. Similar ones that have changed are Stone's River, Harper's Ferry, and Sayler's Creek (now called Sailors Creek by the NPS!) http://www.civilwarhome.com/championhill.htm uses the old spelling, based on the ORs, presumably. I prefer to use the NPS naming and spelling unless there are mitigating circumstances. For example, in the Battle of Sayler's Creek article, I demonstrated how most modern historians use the original name, despite what the NPS says. Of course, Manassas/Bull Run is the really glaring example of NPS deviation. Hal Jespersen 17:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response! That being the case, I think I will let my reversion stand. If there is controversy and discussion over it, I will use the argument you use above, which makes sense to me (without mentioning you, of course...I don't want to drag you into it unless your expertise is needed). BTW, I note that even the Civil War Home Web site uses championhill.htm as the page file name, rather than championshill.htm. :-) Best, Tim --Tkynerd 17:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]