User talk:Wikipedialuva/Archives/2023/July

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Wikipedialuva. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there, Wikipedialuva, and thanks for creating an interesting biography of Jane Hall Johnson. If you intend to write more women's biographies, you might find it useful to become a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we trying to chip away at the gender gap. If you are interested, you can sing up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any problems. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Wikipedialuva, thanks for reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for anti-vandalism patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandalism tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 02:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Help improvements. Thanks you. 27.65.26.100 (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

I replied to the user on their talkpage (due to being IP), offered help, and also suggested they visit Teahouse. Wikipedialuva (talk) 07:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

The IP spammed messages like this to 30 or so user talk pages. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, Wikipedialuva, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a couple of women's biographies and hope there will be many more. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through some of our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276 Online events: New: Women in Red's 8th anniversary | Alphabet run A & B | Sports Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Look out for contributors interested in writing about women and invite them to join Women in Red Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 06:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Wikipedialuva. Thank you for your work on Melissa Oropeza. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Greetings! I trust you're having a wonderful day. I wanted to express my gratitude for your valuable contribution to Wikipedia through your article. I'm delighted to inform you that your article has successfully met Wikipedia's guidelines, and as a result, I have reviewed and marked it accordingly. Wishing you and your family a fantastic day ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

@SunDawn: Thanks for such a quick review! Wikipedialuva (talk) 02:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

	Women in Red 8th Anniversary
	In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hello Wikipedialuva/Archives/2023!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I believe you just undid, then deleted your undo of my edit, adding a citation needed tag to a section of the article about the ROC Air Forces.

On the page here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Volunteer_Group the same claim exists; "The Soviet squadrons were withdrawn after the non-aggression pact between the Soviet Union and Germany in 1939."

Note that unlike in the first article we encountered each other, the link refers to the Soviet-Japanese neutrality pact, while the article test refers to the pact that's probably more well known among English speakers. I suspect that at some point, these articles were written in a way that reflected this, and maybe they even had references to back up this claim, as it would make sense. But I don't really know if I should be changing that without a reference. What do you think? 122.150.92.52 (talk) 10:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Yes, I did accidentally revert your edit by pressing a wrong button on software I use to revert vandalism called AntiVandal (although it was my fault for accidentally pressing the wrong button though and I take full responsibility). I restored your edit immediately (within 1 minute) with this edit, so the page currently reflects your edit. I also removed the notice (that is automatically added when I revert an edit) from your userpage with this edit. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience or distress this caused.

Regarding the "Soviet Volunteer Group" article, that statement appears to reference page 28 of a 2007 book entitled "Flying Tigers: Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941–1942" by Daniel Ford. I do not have access to the book so I cannot confirm or deny whether it actually supported. If you feel this is inaccurate, or you have conflicting sources, I think your best course of action is to start a discussion on the article's talkpage on how to best address this. You might also look at some of the inline templates available to see if these are applicable. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

May I ask if this response was guided by any kind of AI? 122.150.92.52 (talk) 13:50, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

No, AI was not used to write my response. Wikipedialuva (talk) 21:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280 Online events: New: Alphabet run C & D | Indigenous women | Film and stage | Geofocus: Arab League Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region. Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging