User talk:Yarnalgo/Archive 6

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 1636 in sports, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 1636 in sports is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 1636 in sports, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a message from the unregistered user who edited the Stratocracy page. The edit I made wasn't a test. The information in the section "Stratocracy in Fiction" was inaccurate. The page claimed that the manga/anime series Fullmetal Alchemist features a stratocracy, when in fact a reference was made to an alternate power structure in vol. 16. I accept that perhaps I should not have edited it without consulting someone, and apologize for the trouble. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.117.138.33 (talk) 05:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yarnalgo , can you please be careful with your speedy deletion tagging? For example:

• This has content and context, it just doesn't say why the company is important.
• This was not spam when you tagged it, but could have been tagged with no content because it just had one external link.
• This has more than enough context to determine the article's subject, and could be prodded or taken to AFD if you think she's non-notable (as she may well be).

Hope that helps. Somno (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will try to be more careful in the future. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 09:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have 6 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 14:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will be careful in my usage and only use it for obvious vandalism. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 19:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would be glad to entertain suggestions on how to improve the appearance of that article, or list actually. Some have suggested using a table, but the variable length of the various data elements don't seem to fit that idea. That's why I'm using kind of an "outline" format. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 05:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check out WP:LIST for the style standards for lists on Wikipedia. I can't really work on it until this weekend because I'm kind of swamped so you can work on it in the meantime if you want to. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 05:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean. The way you have it is fine and probably the best we will be able to do. I removed the cleanup tag. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 06:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, why did you change the license tag on some of User:Jonathanmallard's images?-Andrew c ^[talk] 03:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because he is a US Army soldier and the pictures were taken during his course of duty. That makes the pictures "work[s] prepared by an officer or employee of the U.S. government as part of that person's official duties" which puts the pictures in the public domain. The license on Flickr is irrelevant because of this. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 06:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have information that I do not? I think the key word in that tag is "official duties" and it isn't clear to me that Mr. Mallard is an Army photographer. I just assumed that these were personal photos taken in an unofficial capacity. I could be mistaken, but I just didn't have evidence to the contrary, which is why I'm contacting you :) To see if you have more information than me. Thanks!-Andrew c ^[talk] 13:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The way it has been previously explained to me, is that as long as he is taking the pictures while on his tour of duty, that constitutes as "part of that person's official duties." It doesn't really matter to me. You can revert the change if you want (on that picture, it wasn't even me who changed the license first). --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 20:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out the n00b. I posted a text file like you suggested at http://zamagazine.org/cordoba_release.txt and updated the IFU page accordingly. I'm just posting it here to cover my bases...I want to make sure someone sees it!

Cheers, Brendinooo (talk) 02:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User DreamGYM is here. I wonder why my User Page was considered for deletion. I created the page to explain a bit about company that initially produced the articles. These articles have no direct connection to the company and do not sell any of its products. It was done on the User page, not as a main article. I was in discussion with another admin (Mindmatrix) about this page and articles. I thought that I'm not "spamming" the Wikipedia this way. Before putting a page together I checked pages about companies that I worked for and competitors pages. All seems to be fine for them. All they did for Wikipedia - just put user page about themselves with a link to their site - pure conflict of interests.

Well, my life did not start on Wikipedia as in paradise :) but I'm optimistic that it can be better.

Best regards, DreamGYM (talk) 03:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well an article like that in the article namespace would definitely be deleted because it is written like an advertisement. To tell you the truth, I'm not exactly sure if you are alowed to write the article in your user page but I was going on a very similar if not exact case where the page was deleted (User:Illusions Online Arabia FZ LLC). --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 06:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt answer. DreamGYM (talk) 10:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance to remove warnings from my talk page? Thanks a lot, DreamGYM (talk) 20:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can remove them yourself anytime you want. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 22:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with the Scottish lacrosse articles. I was amazed to see that there were none until recentluy, because of the long history of it here.

I was wondering if you could create articles on the mens and women's international teams, as well please. Many thanks.--MacRusgail (talk) 16:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added the following, check 'em out - National lacrosse teams - Scotland (M) · Scotland (W) · Indoor

Thanks for your help with the other ones. I am not a lacrosse fan, but I felt that there should be at least something on Scottish lacrosse, considering it's been played here for at least a hundred years.--MacRusgail (talk) 15:24, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool thanks. I'll try and do some work on them. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 21:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your request at User:Drilnoth/codefixer.js/doc; I have a question about it, and have left it there. –Drilnoth (T • C) 12:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding an 'under construction' tag to my new St Paul's, Harringay page. I was unhappy at having to leave off mid-project, and you helped me leave things neat and tidy for visitors ... appreciated. Will continue next weekend ... . Ucypanp (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm glad to help. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 20:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for improving the various lists by adding images. Are you able to add the images to the corresponding German language articles or would it be better if I gave a shout to a German editor to do this? Mjroots (talk) 03:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can probably do them too but right now I'm still working on the English lists. In the meantime you could have a German editor do them or just wait. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 03:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll wait. After all, there's no rush, is there? If you have any problems, give User:DeNiteshift a shout (de:Benutzer:Niteshift is his German user page), he speaks better English than his Babel suggests. Mjroots (talk) 03:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright sounds good. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 03:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you used the tool "CodeFixer" to just add two characters to the template {{current court case}}. This is your edit: [1]

You changed from the wikimarkup <br> tag to the XHTML <br /> tag. There's no consensus for doing such changes.

So which should we use? <br> or <br />?

Let's examine this step by step:

1: Writing the XHTML code <br/> without a blank is even against the recommendations of the World Wide Web Consortium, instead it should be written as <br /> since then HTML parsers can understand it too. HTML parsers will simply regard <br /> as a "br" with an unknown parameter "/", while they will regard "br/" as an unknown tag name. So we should definitely not teach people to write <br/>, but possibly <br />.

2: The "HTML" codes we use here at Wikipedia are not XHTML markup nor are they HTML markup, instead they are "HTML wikimarkup", since MediaWiki processes them just like wikimarkup.

3: Wikipedia mainly uses wikimarkup. The reason for that is simple: Most people that edit Wikipedia are people who never have made a web page, so they know nothing about HTML, XHTML or CSS. So for them (and even for us old webmaster geeks) it is easier to use wikimarkup.

4: As far as I have seen the documentation for MediaWiki talks about "HTML in wikitext" and never mentions "XHTML in wikitext". Also up until recently all documentation listed <br> as the code for forced line breaks. But some time ago some XHTML enthusiasts went around and edited a lot of the help pages to show the <br /> or even the <br/>.

So which should we use? <br> or <br />?

Well, let's first ask another question: Which markup should we use for bold text?

• '''Bold'''
• <b>Bold</b>
• <span style="font-weight:bold;">Bold</span>

I think we all know that the wikimarkup '''Bold''' is the recommended one. Mainly because it is simpler to use, especially for the majority of editors that don't know HTML and CSS.

The same goes for <br> vs <br />. The HTML wikimarkup <br> is easier for the majority of editors to use, and it is shorter.

Sure, we have a "teaching opportunity" to teach people to use the <br />, but there is a very high risk that they instead will use the <br/> and that would be a bad thing. And believe it or not, many beginners have problems telling "/" and "\" apart. So they sometimes use the <br\> or even </br>...

So again, the <br> is easier for the majority of editors to use, and it is shorter.

--David Göthberg (talk) 02:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at User:Drilnoth/codefixer.js/doc#.3Cbr.3E tags --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 06:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded for your excellent work in adding photographs to the various Lists of German windmills. Mjroots (talk) 19:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 22:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yarn, you posted a note at User talk:Smith03 about American vs British english. Are you talking about this edit? I think Smith's change of "colour->color" is appropriate based on the MLL -- similar to MLB -- being a US based league (i.e. using American english). Also, since the editor has been around for a long time, you may want to consider WP:DTTR. -Mitico (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yea, and thanks for your tweaks and additions to the field lacrosse article! Mitico (talk) 12:02, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to American English because the reference was to the old Rochester (American) team. thanks for your concern Smith03 (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry about that. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 01:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! In response to your edit summary here, for the {{notaforum}} template: It is in fact possible to test changes in other namespaces. I explain how here. Hope this helps. Happy editing! —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 02:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice! --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 03:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I commented at the FfD. The photo is credited to Army Athletic Communications. The athletic department of the United States Military Academy is part of the Department of the Army, and therefore its works are in the public domain. Strikehold (talk) 04:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your right, I was thinking because it was on the Go Army athletics page (commercial site with copyright notice as I said; West Point main site does not have copyright notice b/c it is PD) that it was copyrighted. But since it has this attribution it is in the public domain as you said. Thanks and great job on the college team articles --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 05:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I probably should've linked directly to the page with the image and attribution instead of the gallery to eliminate any confusion. The (C) at the bottom of the site, I assume, was put there by privately contracted website developers. They may hold some rights over some things like the web design, but may not necessarily understand copyright law as it applies to the USG. Strikehold (talk) 05:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's showing up on all the articles tagged for rescue as a big wonky error message. -- Banjeboi 18:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is weird... Any idea why? I tried it out in my sandbox and it worked fine. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 18:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to be paranoid but everytime something "weird" happens it sadly points to someone who has issues with the Article Rescue Squad (sigh); the {{BLP sources}} template used our idea but had different coding. Hmmmm. I think it's someone's pointy way of saying they think rescue template only should be on the talkpage of an article but community consensus has maintained that mainpage usage is completely fine. -- Banjeboi 18:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.s. thank you for trying to fix this. -- Banjeboi 20:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yarnalgo, I've replied on this page: I've got another question when you're back; how do the titles work? For instance, I'm planning to have lots of different boxes which can be used across a number of pages; if I put in a page something like "<{{Casebox consideration}}>" would that mean that the template page itself would be "Template:Casebox consideration"? Wikidea 12:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the way that came up on the page (rather than in the edit page), I think I answered my own question! Wikidea 12:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you added and then removed Category:Sportspeople from Ontario — just to let you know, the category does exist, but it's in the naming format Category:Ontario sportspeople. It should get moved to the "Sportspeople from Ontario" format, but it hasn't yet because all of the other Canadian sportspeople-by-province categories would have to get done at the same time. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 05:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks for the help. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 05:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		For your advice and expertise in creating a template for list of legal cases, and being super helpful and patient with my requests. Wikidea 00:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I think I've cracked it, as seen here. Thanks so much for your help!

No problem at all. Glad I could help. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 00:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the Sr. B from the template only because it seemed redundant at the time. I will make an article for the WCSLA next. A decent league out in BC. DMighton (talk) 19:27, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's only there because the OLA leagues are all called "OLA Level". So it's differentiate between the other OLA leagues. If you want to remove them that's fine with me. --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 19:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nah... don't worry about it... I just wanted to make more room... that was all. The OLA isn't all that creative about naming their leagues... lol. DMighton (talk) 19:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you replaced the version showing a flax leaf (which I believe is correct), with one that showing a shamrock (which is not)? Andrew Le Sueur (talk) 12:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I did not realize it wasn't accurate. The svg version was made because of a request at Commons. I don't think the creator realized that it wasn't the right leaf. It should be changed back to the correct badge until the svg is fixed (I haven't checked to see if you have done this already yet). --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 22:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please e-mail me for the question at LDEJRuff@yahoo.com.
~~LDEJRuff~~ ^{(see what I've contributed)} 14:37, 08 June 2009 (EDT)

I emailed you, but in the future why don't you just use Special:EmailUser/Yarnalgo? --Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 21:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yarnalgo. You have new messages at MrBoo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please can you explain why you made this edit? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:18, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the url property used for the website? Am I missing something? --Yarnalgo _talk to me 19:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean used by the microformat? Yes, but only as a property of the "A" element; or if the URL is displayed on the page, as opposed to link text. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then. Sorry about that. --Yarnalgo _talk to me 21:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NP. It would be better if MediaWiki allowed us to add classes to "A" elements. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Yarnalgo. I have just reviewed your recent series of edits to the Amanda O'Leary article, to wit:

1. There is no express or implied prohibition on the use of nicknames in the Template:Persondata. In fact, not including common nicknames in the persondata when the article is titled under the subject's birth name makes no darn sense. The persondata template is meta data; it makes the page more readily searchable on the internet without having to include every variation on the subject's name within the article title or text. Try searching "Mandee O'Leary" or "Mandee Moore" on Google and it will highlight the metadata within the article.

2. Re-spacing the article every time you edit it is an annoyance, and it screws up the diff comparisons (this article has never had anything other than "standard spacing"). Standard spacing (i.e. single line spaces between paragraphs headers and other codes, two spaces after sentence-ending periods) is expressly permitted by the Wikipedia protocols and makes reading and editing of the code much easier and faster, especially for those of us with less than perfect vision. As a courtesy, please do not re-space this article.

3. The use of ndashes is expressly permitted by WP:MOS and is used almost uniformly throughout Wikipedia sports projects to make citation page spans (e.g., pp. 175–202), year spans (e.g., 1999–2002), win-loss records (e.g., 13–1) and game scores (e.g., 21–7) easier to read quickly. Every other University of Florida article is formatted this way across multiple sports, including those subject to the College Football, College Basketball, Baseball and Volleyball Wikipedia Projects, which all strongly prefer (and many actually enforce) the use of the ndash as described. Frankly, I doubt the Lacrosse WikiProject is any different to the extent anyone has actually considered formatting consistency.

4. I have restored those non-duplicative "See also" article links that are directly related to the article subject, with an explanatory notation, per the WP:SEEALSO guidelines. Several of those deleted by you were not duplicates of those links found in the body text of the article.

5. We are already working on a new University of Florida navbox, which will include clearer links to all Florida Gators sports teams and current coaches for use on all Florida Gators team and current coach pages. Most of this information was already included within the general University of Florida navbox you deleted. I would be grateful if you would not delete the new version of this navbox when it is ready. The primary readers of the Amanda O'Leary and Florida Gators lacrosse articles are University of Florida alumni and other Florida Gators fans. Deleting these navboxes just makes it harder for them to find other Gators sports articles when navigating Wikipedia.

6. After the date of birth and living person categories, categories are generally listed alphabetically in the absence of a clear hierarchy or priority order per Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization. Most Wikipedia article categories are listed alphabetically because no objective hierarchy or priority order can be established.

You have made very helpful substantive additions to these articles in the past, notably including information and improvements regarding Coach O'Leary's personal life, family, Hall of Fame membership, etc. These constructive edits are always welcome additions. Reformatting non-substantive elements of the article per your personal tastes is an enormous waste of your time and my time, especially when one of the stated goals of my project is to impose uniform formatting per WP:MOS on all of our Florida Gators article, and other Wiki sports projects are doing their best to enforce those same uniform formatting standards. If necessary, I will pursue this with an administrator and/or Wiki mediation or arbitration not because I want to, but because our project cannot spend its time trying to reconcile non-standard formatting of individual editors (even if they are leaders of other projects) with their own tastes.

If you would like to discuss these matters further, I am more than willing to discuss them with you. You may e-mail me through the link on the tool box infobox (at left) on my user page. Please consider what I have taken the time to explain above before reformatting the article again. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(2) I really apologize about the spacing thing and I will try not to change that again (I use Auto Ed which does it automatically and sometimes I just forget how disruptive to the page layout and diff it can be). (1) Per WP:PDATA, "The optional |ALTERNATIVE NAMES= field is used to list other common (usually international) forms of the person name, but not simply abbreviated versions of the full name." That is what I was working off but if you feel it is necessary to include her nicknames that is fine. (3) As far as the endashes go, I did not replace any. It may have appeared that way in the code because I replaced the HTML entities (–) with the Unicode character (–) which looks close to a hyphen (-) in the code. There is no official ruling on which one to use over the other but the general preference is the Unicode characters because they are easier to read in code and use less bytes (if you want to use the entities that's fine; I don't feel that strongly either way). (4–6) I really did not mean any harm and I have read what you've written and understand it. Thanks. --Yarnalgo _talk to me 01:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your consideration, Yarnalgo. I really do appreciate your lacrosse knowledge and your expertise with lacrosse-specific references. I am an adopted Gator by transfer and later graduate studies at Florida, having attended UVA for two years first. My first-year UVA roommate was a high-school All-American at a well-known Baltimore area prep school, and he was my introduction to lacrosse. When we finish cleaning up our Florida Gators sports articles later this year, I would love to help you with your project's priority articles.

BTW, if we have missed any obvious lacrosse reference resources in either the O'Leary or Gators team articles, I would be very grateful if you would add them to the articles or let me know where to find them. The on-line lacrosse history and statistics references are still a whole new universe to me, and I am certain we Gators lacrosse newbies are missing some of the good stuff that's out there. Thanks again. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 2010 World Lacrosse Championship at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Calmer Waters 01:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Task complete. 261 edits. FYI today's edits were the ones where liberal settings had an effect (i.e. there were disagreements among other projects - we went with the most frequent or highest rating in even-strength disagreements). –xeno^talk 16:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• FYI re the "mistagged as lacrosse" edits: keep in mind that the next time a bot runs over your categories to tag, these will all get re-added since they are in applicable categories. –xeno^talk 20:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks. I will try to fix some of the categories that are causing problems. --Yarnalgo _talk to me 20:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 April, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2010 World Lacrosse Championship, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Scott Marr at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 May, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Scott Marr, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 18:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you still keeping track of the above FLC? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add a career highlight parameter to {{Infobox Lacrosse Player}}?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:27, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Use the parameter career_highlight and tell me if that's what you meant. --Yarnalgo _talk to me 02:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You need to update the documentation on the page so that everyone can see how to use it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Something is wrong with the text wrap. See User:TonyTheTiger/sandbox/Kevin Lowe (lacrosse).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you changed the syntax of the website link, which is going to cause all uses of the website in this template to suddenly be malformated.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The template doesn't wrap by design so just add line breaks manually. As far as the websites, I went through every article that uses that parameter and updated them and then added a note to the doc. --Yarnalgo _talk to me 08:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now the default website is {{URL|example.com}} Instead of just an omitted line.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all other sports have standardized widths that force line breaks. See most athletes in other sports and the general NCAA athlete such as User:TonyTheTiger/sandbox/Scott Bacigalupo.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(←) Added a fixed width and fixed the website. --Yarnalgo _talk to me 22:04, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please revisit Kevin Lowe (lacrosse) and see how odd it looks that everything is indented half way across. Can you reformat to be more like the aforementioned infoboxes for other sports.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Think I got it. Look good now? --Yarnalgo _talk to me 23:48, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thanks for your efforts.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to keep the teams from looking so smushed?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:45, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See other sports like Juwan Howard or Tyrone Wheatley.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2010 World Lacrosse Championship logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 20:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2010 World Lacrosse Championship logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Warrior Lacrosse logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stx logo.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Warrior Hockey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems non-notable and is borderline advertising.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KaySL^talk 18:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The website parameter at Template:Infobox lacrosse player is still not working correctly. E.G., Alex Hewit.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Buffalo Bandits logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Abhorsen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Long Island Lizards logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:31, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i was just looking at the above page,that on the man who was my college lacrosse coach. i must say i am mystified by the calculations that yielded the 'percentages' listed in his record. they are so far off that i wonder if i'm understanding what they represent. the 1974 season, for example, is described as 12 and 2, giving a percentage of .467. by my calculation that gives a winning percentage of .857. another season is described as 8 and 0, yet the percentage is not 1.000. i see no trace of vandalism. what am i missing?Toyokuni3 (talk) 23:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The System Is Down.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 14:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stx putters.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:STX golf.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 14:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Minnesota Swarm logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	I just want to say thank you for creating {{Birth based on age as of date}}! You are a gentleman and a scholar. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:19, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lakeshores Barrie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:43, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Yarnalgo/Archive 6 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 00:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Yarnalgo, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 14:59, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Brooklin redmen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nihongo foot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rochester Knighthawks logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect All by Myself(Grey's Anatomy). Since you had some involvement with the All by Myself(Grey's Anatomy) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yarnalgo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rochester Rattlers logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Major League Lacrosse Weekly Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major League Lacrosse Weekly Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 06:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yarnalgo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Kodiaks lax.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yarnalgo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Supercuts.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 13:39, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Odwalla logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Major League Lacrosse logo.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free former logo whose use in Major League Lacrosse fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFC#cite_note-4. Non-free former logos may be allowed when the logo itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary about how the logo or team's branding has changed over the years, but they are not really allowed just to show the how the former logo looked. There needs to be a stronger contextual connection between the actual logo and the article content discussing the team's choice of branding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cascade (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cascade (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Teratix ₵ 23:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:French lacrosse players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]