விக்கிப்பீடியா:கட்டுப்பட்ட உள்ளடக்கம்
கொள்கை
நோக்கங்கள்இந்தக் கொள்கை வகுப்புக்கு மூன்று முக்கிய நோக்கங்கள் காணப்படுகின்றன.
கொள்கைஇந்தக் கொள்கையின் நோக்கங்களுக்காக "இலவசமற்ற உள்ளடக்கம்" என்பது அனைத்து பதிப்புரிமை பெற்ற படங்கள் மற்றும் பிற ஊடகக் கோப்புகளைக் கொண்டிருக்கவில்லை இலவச உள்ளடக்க உரிமம். பின்வரும் 10 அளவுகோல்களும் பூர்த்தி செய்யப்படும் இடங்களில் மட்டுமே இத்தகைய பொருள் ஆங்கில விக்கிபீடியாவில் பயன்படுத்தப்படலாம்.
அமுல்படுத்தல்இந்த கொள்கைகளுடன் பொருந்தாத கோப்புகள் கோப்பை பதிவேற்றியவருக்கு 48 மணித்தியால அவகாசம் கொடுக்கப்பட்டு நீக்கப்படும். நீக்கப்படுவதை தவிர்ப்பதற்கு பதிவேற்றிய பயனர் அல்லது வேறு ஒரு விக்கிபீடியர் மேல் குறித்த 10 காரணிகளையும் தக்கவைக்கக் கூடிய வாதத்தை முன்வைக்க வேண்டும். 2007 டிசம்பர் 31 நாளுக்கு முன்னர் பதிவேற்றப்பட்டப் படிமங்களுக்கு பதிவேற்றியவர் அல்லது வேறு பயனர் ஒருவர் கேட்டுக் கொண்டால் 7 தொடக்கம் 14 நாள் அவகாசம் கொடுக்கப்படலாம். நியாயமான பயன்பான்டின் கீழ் பதிவேற்றப்பட்டு ஒரு கட்டுரையிலும் பயன்படுத்தப்படாத படிமங்கள் பதிவேற்றியவருக்கு 7 நாள் அவகாசம் கொடுத்து நீக்கப்படும். இலவசமற்ற உள்ளடக்கத்திற்கான நீக்குதல் அளவுகோல்கள் Wikipedia:விரைவாக நீக்குவதற்கான அளவுகோல்கள் குறிப்பிடப்பட்டுள்ளன சில (ஆனால் அனைத்துமே இல்லை) கட்டுரைகளுக்கு நியாயமான பயன்பாட்டு பகுத்தறிவு இல்லாததால் மட்டுமே மீறப்படும் படம் நீக்கப்படாது. அதற்கு பதிலாக, படத்தின் பயன்பாடு புண்படுத்தும் கட்டுரைகளிலிருந்து அகற்றப்படும்.
விளக்க எடுத்துக்காட்டுக்கள்Non-free content that meets all of the policy criteria above but does not fall under one of the designated categories below may or may not be allowable, depending on what the material is and how it is used. These examples are not meant to be exhaustive, and depending on the situation there are exceptions. When in doubt as to whether non-free content may be included, please make a judgement based on the spirit of the policy, not necessarily the exact wording. If you want help in assessing whether a use is acceptable, please ask at Wikipedia:Requested copyright examinations or Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Wikipedia talk:Copyrights, Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems, and Wikipedia talk:Non-free content may also be useful. These are places where those who understand copyright law and Wikipedia policy are likely to be watching. ஏற்கக்கூடிய பயன்பாடுஉரைBrief quotations of copyrighted text may be used to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea. Copyrighted text must be attributed and used verbatim. Any alterations must be clearly marked, i.e. [brackets] for added text, an ellipsis (...) for removed text, and emphasis noted after the quotation as "(emphasis added)" or "(emphasis in the original)". Extensive quotation of copyrighted text is prohibited.
ஒளி ஒலிக் கோப்புக்கள்
படிமங்கள்Some copyrighted images may be used on Wikipedia, providing they meet both the legal criteria for fair use, and Wikipedia's own guidelines for non-free content. Copyrighted images that reasonably can be replaced by free/libre images are not suitable for Wikipedia.
ஏற்க முடியாத பயன்பாடுஉரை
ஒளி ஒலிக் கோப்புக்கள்
படிமங்கள்நியாயமான பயன்பாட்டிற்கான சட்ட விதிகளையும், விக்கிப்பீடியாவின் கட்டற்ற உள்ளடக்கம் தொடர்பான விதிகளையும் நிவர்த்தி செய்யுமிடத்து தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியாவில் பதிப்புரிமையால் கட்டுப்பட்ட சில படிமங்களை பயன்படுத்தலாம். கட்டற்ற படிமங்கள் உள்ள அல்லது கட்டற்ற படிமங்கள் தயாரிக்கப்படக்கூடிய கருப்பொருள் தொடர்பான படிமங்கள் தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியாவுக்கு பொருத்தமற்றவையாகும்.
பட்டியல்களில் கட்டுப்பட்ட படிமங்களின் பயன்பாடுIn articles and sections of articles that consist of several small sections of information for a series of elements common to a topic, such as a list of characters in a fictional work, non-free images should be used judiciously to present the key visual aspects of the topic. It is inadvisable to provide a non-free image for each entry in such an article or section. The following considerations should be made to reduce the amount of new non-free images associated with such lists:
நடைமுறைப்படுத்தல்Non-free images need a copyright tag, source information, and use rationales. We have various copyright tag templates. Be sure to describe the source from which the image was obtained. A separate use rationale must be written each time the image is used in an article, specific to that particular use. All of these go in the image description page at the time the image file is uploaded. Explanation of policy and guidelinesBackground"Free" content is defined as that which meets the "Definition of Free Cultural Works". Material that is not free is permitted only if it meets the restrictions of this policy. This has been explicitly declared since May 2005.[1] The stated mission of the விக்கிமீடியா நிறுவனம், which runs Wikipedia, is "to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally." These concerns are embodied in the above requirements that all non-free content must meet, and our policy of deleting non-compliant content. Being generous to the world sometimes means being hard on ourselves. Please understand that these rules are not arbitrary; they are central to our mission. Wikipedia distributes content throughout the world with no restrictions on how people use it. Legally, we could use any copyrighted material for ourselves that is either licensed to us by the owner, or that fits the definition of "fair use" under US copyright law. However, we favor content that everyone can use, not just Wikipedia. We want them to be free to use, redistribute, or modify the content, for any purpose, without significant legal restrictions, particularly those of பதிப்புரிமை. To honor its mission, Wikipedia accepts incoming copyright licenses only if they meet the definition of "free" use. This is a higher standard than we would need just for our own use. But our ability to use a work does not guarantee that others may use it. We reject licenses that limit use exclusively to Wikipedia or for non-commercial purposes. Commercial use is a complex issue that goes well beyond a company's for-profit status, another reason to be careful. In fact, we reject any licenses with significant limitations. That is not free enough. Similarly, Wikipedia imposes higher fair-use standards on itself than US copyright law. There are some works, such as important photographs, significant modern artworks, that we cannot realistically expect to be released under a free content license, but that are hard to discuss in an educational context without including examples from the media itself. In other cases such as cover art / product packaging, a non-free work is needed to discuss a related subject. This policy allows such material to be used if it meet U.S. legal tests for fair use, but we impose additional limitations. Just because something is "fair use" on a Wikipedia article in the US does not mean it is fair use in another context. A downstream user's commercial use of content in a commercial setting may be illegal even if our noncommercial use is legal. Use in another country with different fair use and fair dealing laws may be illegal as well. That would fail our mission. We therefore limit the media content we offer, to make sure what we do offer has the widest possible legal distribution. We do not want downstream re-users to rely solely on our assurances. They are liable for their own actions, no matter what we tell them. We therefore show them and let them make their own decision. To that end we require a copyright tag describing the nature of a copyrighted work, sourcing material saying exactly where any non-free content comes from, and a detailed non-free media rationale for every use of copyrighted content in every article, justifying why use in that article is permitted. A further goal of minimizing licensed and fair-use material is to encourage creation of original new content, rather than relying on borrowed content that comes with restrictions. Legal positionIn generalUnder ஐக்கிய அமெரிக்காவின் பதிப்புரிமைச் சட்டம், creative works published in the United States prior to 1923 are in the பொது உரிமைப் பரப்பு. Some creative works published in the United States between 1923 and 1963 are still copyrighted. It is illegal (among other things) to reproduce or make derivative works of copyrighted works without legal justification.[2] Unless a thorough search is conducted to determine that a copyright has expired or not been renewed, it should be regarded as copyrighted.[3] Certain works have no copyright at all. Most material published in the United States before 1923, works published before 1978 without a copyright notice, with an expired copyright term, or produced by the US government, among others, is பொது உரிமைப் பரப்பு, i.e. has no copyright. Some such as photos and scans of 2-dimensional objects and other "slavish reproductions", short text phrases, typographic logos, and product designs, do not have a sufficient degree of creativity apart from their functional aspects to have a copyright. Copyright law only governs creative expressions that are "fixed in a tangible medium of expression," not the ideas or information behind the works. It is legal to reformulate ideas based on written texts, or create images or recordings inspired by others, as long as there is no copying (see கருத்துத் திருட்டு for how much reformulation is necessary). If material does have a copyright, it may only be copied or distributed under a license (permission) from the copyright holder, or under the doctrine of நியாயமான பயன்பாடு. If there is a valid license, the user must stay within the scope of the license (which may include limitations on amount of use, geographic or business territory, time period, nature of use, etc.). Fair use, by contrast, is a limited right to use copyrighted works without permission, highly dependent on the specific circumstances of the work and the use in question. It is a doctrine incorporated as a clause in United States copyright code, arising out of a concern that strict application of copyright law would limit criticism, commentary, scholarship, and other important free speech rights. A comparable concept of fair dealing exists in some other countries, where standards may vary. Any materials that were published in other nations, and which are copyrighted under the laws of that nation, should be considered to be copyrighted in the United States under the URAA. Applied to WikipediaNever use materials that infringe the copyrights of others. This could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt the project. Uploading an image file, audio or video file, or text quotation into Wikipedia, and adding that file to a project page, both raise copyright concerns. Editors who do either must make sure their contributions are legal. If there is any doubt as to legality, ask others for help, try to find a free equivalent, or use your own words to make the same point. Also, consider asking the copyright holder to release the work under an appropriate குனூ தளையறு ஆவண உரிமம் license. See Wikipedia:Boilerplate request for permission for a sample form letter. If a work has no copyright or is licensed to Wikipedia under an acceptable "free" license, it is a free work and may be used on Wikipedia without copyright concerns. See பொது உரிமைப் பரப்பு, பதிப்புரிமை, and Cornell University's guide to copyright terms for discussion of works that are not covered by copyright. Also see free license regarding free licenses and Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses for a list of copyright tags for these works. Restricted licenses to these works offer some legal rights, but Wikipedia ignores them because they are not free enough for its purposes. Instead, works covered by inadequate licenses are treated the same on Wikipedia as works with no licenses at all. If a work is not free, Wikipedia requires that it comply with Wikipedia's non-free use policy. As explained above, this policy is more restrictive than US law requires. Logically, material that satisfies the policy should also satisfy legal requirements as well. However, to be more certain of avoiding legal liability, and to understand the meaning of Wikipedia policy, editors should consider the legal rules as well. See நியாயமான பயன்பாடு for further information, and the Stanford University summary of relevant cases, on the subject of fair use. Non-free material is used only if, in addition to other restrictions, we firmly believe that the use would be deemed fair use if we were taken to court. The Wikimedia Foundation reserves the right to remove unfree copyrighted content at any time. Note that citation sources and external links raise other copyright concerns that are addressed in other policies. Other Wikimedia projectsThis policy is specific to the English language Wikipedia. Other Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedias in other languages, may have different policies on non-free content. Some of them do not allow any fair use. இவற்றையும் பார்க்க
xxx வெளி இணைப்புகள்
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
