坡氏定律

坡氏定律（英語：Poe's law），也称坡氏定则、坡氏法则，是由一名名为“内森·坡（Nathan Poe）”的网络用户在2005年提出的一条互連网文化中的“定则”或者格言。^[1]大致内容是，只要作者没有註明他是在反串的话，其言论一定会被其他一些用户认为他是真的在表达极端思想。因为在网络上很难区分“真正的过激主张”和“玩梗或者反串”。或者，你用来讽刺攻击他人（以使其理解到自身矛盾而瓦解）的夸张理念，可能是该派系极端成员完全支持的理念。^[2]在这条“定则”出现之前，互联网上便已出现过类似的言论或表达，但都没有该“定则”传播广泛。^[3]^[4]

法则

只要没有明确表示出幽默诙谐，创造一个对嘲讽极端主义或原教旨主义的某种嘲讽，而不让所有人都不会误解为真，便是不可能的。
Without a blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of extremism or fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.
^[5]

参见

克拉克基本定律的第三条
高德温法则

参考资料

^ Poe, Nathan. Big contradictions in the evolution theory. christianforums.com. 11 August 2005 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014年5月31日）. Originally Posted by Pete Harcoff "Good thing you included the winky. Otherwise people might think you are serious." - Response - POE'S LAW: Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article. ^{[失效連結]}
^ Aikin, Scott F. Poe's Law, Group Polarization, and the Epistemology of Online Religious Discourse. Social Science Research Network. January 23, 2009. SSRN 1332169 .
^ Emily Post for Usenet. November 1, 1983 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-02）. (Emily Post)
^ Bush's testing plan.. February 1, 2001 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-02）.
^ Chivers, Tom. Internet rules and laws: the top 10, from Godwin to Poe. The Telegraph. Oct 23, 2009 [2022-08-10]. （原始内容存档于2018-06-19）. : "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing."

[OriginalSource_11th_August_2005,_12:17_AM-1] Poe, Nathan. Big contradictions in the evolution theory. christianforums.com. 11 August 2005 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014年5月31日）. Originally Posted by Pete Harcoff "Good thing you included the winky. Otherwise people might think you are serious." - Response - POE'S LAW: Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article. ^{[失效連結]}

[aiken-2] Aikin, Scott F. Poe's Law, Group Polarization, and the Epistemology of Online Religious Discourse. Social Science Research Network. January 23, 2009. SSRN 1332169 .

[usenet-3] Emily Post for Usenet. November 1, 1983 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-02）. (Emily Post)

[usenetpost-4] Bush's testing plan.. February 1, 2001 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-02）.

[tele-5] Chivers, Tom. Internet rules and laws: the top 10, from Godwin to Poe. The Telegraph. Oct 23, 2009 [2022-08-10]. （原始内容存档于2018-06-19）. : "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing."

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

坡氏定律

法则

参见

参考资料

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia