In mathematics, the Brownian motion and the Riemann zeta function are two central objects of study in mathematics originating from different fields - probability theory and analytic number theory - that have mathematical connections between them. The relationships between stochastic processes derived from the Brownian motion and the Riemann zeta function show in a sense inuitively the stochastic behaviour underlying the Riemann zeta function. A representation of the Riemann zeta function in terms of stochastic processes is called a stochastic representation.[1][2]
Brownian Motion and the Riemann Zeta Function
Let
denote the Riemann zeta function and
the gamma function, then the Riemann xi function is defined as

satisfying the functional equation

It turns out that
describes the moments of a probability distribution
[2][3]
![{\displaystyle 2\xi (s)=\mathbb {E} [X^{s}]=\int _{0}^{\infty }x^{s}d\mu (x),\quad \forall s\in \mathbb {C} }](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/678031a629c67f55c505a86113d2b5fb51234fd6)
Brownian Bridge and Riemann Zeta Function
In 1987 Marc Yor and Philippe Biane proved that the random variable defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum of a Brownian bridge
describes the same distribution. A Brownian bridge is a one-dimensional Brownian motion
conditioned on
.[4] They showed that

is a solution for the moment equation
![{\displaystyle 2\xi (s)=\mathbb {E} [X^{s}]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/901cc3e55e065efe7a4a6c06f3c71a5c148701f2)
However, this is not the only process related to this distribution, for example the Bessel process also gives rise to random variables with the same distribution.
Bessel process and Riemann Zeta Function
A Bessel process
of order
is the Euclidean norm of a
-dimensional Brownian motion. The
process is defined as

where
is a
-dimensional Brownian motion.
Define the hitting time
and let
be an independent hitting time of another
process. Define the random variable

then we have
[5][2]
Distribution
Let
be the Radon–Nikodym density of the distribution
, then the density satisfies the equation[2]

for the theta function[2]

An alternative parametrization
yields[5]

with explicit form

where
and

See also
References