User talk:Pbsouthwood
References Good article reassessment for Diving cylinderDiving cylinder has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2025 (UTC) I left some ideas on the reassessment page. Cheers. Fred Hsu (talk) 03:38, 2 August 2025 (UTC) Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Eagle Tree on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! (trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (talk|botop) 01:30, 11 July 2025 (UTC) Question from Xzkdeng (06:01, 14 July 2025)Hi,Pbsouthwood! I published a change in an wiki when I am logged in. But when I looked into the history page, it showed up an ip address instead of my user name. I wonder if this is a bug. --Xzkdeng (talk) 06:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Question from Darrinpdaniel (13:19, 14 July 2025)I was turned down on my page due to not having enough sited references or citations. Can you assist me in changing so I could resubmit --Darrinpdaniel (talk) 13:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Question from Mirana 48 (20:51, 14 July 2025)Hello I am at the most basic level of copyediting and can't seem to find info on how to delete a word oe phrase on a page. Would like to build my skills. Please help with this first step. Thank you. --Mirana 48 (talk) 20:51, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Southern African Underwater and Hyperbaric Medical Association for deletion![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern African Underwater and Hyperbaric Medical Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.LibStar (talk) 23:59, 15 July 2025 (UTC) Administrator Elections | Discussion phase Administrator Elections | Discussion phase
The discussion phase of the July 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Discussion phase. On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote. Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats"). Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC) PartifulHi Pbsouthwood, I have a few suggestions for the Partiful article. As you are a member of WP: Technology, I thought you might have a look here. Thanks! Lucas285 (talk) 14:53, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:LIV (nightclub) on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! (trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (talk|botop) 15:30, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Administrator Elections | Voting phase Administrator Elections | Voting phase
The voting phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started and continues until July 29 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Voting phase. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA. Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats"). Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Southern Africa Underwater and Hyperbaric Medicine Association logo.png![]() Thanks for uploading File:Southern Africa Underwater and Hyperbaric Medicine Association logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 26 July 2025 (UTC) Question from PrintHallo (11:10, 29 July 2025)Hello, I’d appreciate your feedback on how I handled a recent content dispute on the Talk:Hannibal (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AHannibal#Hannibal_is_born_in_Modern_day_Tunisia) page. A user added a fringe theory—claiming Hannibal was born in Malta—supported by a non-reliable and speculative source. This claim was inserted into the infobox, giving it undue weight alongside the scholarly consensus that he was born in Carthage (modern-day Tunisia). I explained on the talk page why the theory violates WP:RS and WP:UNDUE and should not be presented without proper context. The user stopped responding after that. I then set a time window for discussion before reverting. Once that passed without further input, I removed the unsupported claim from the article and posted a clear warning in red on the talk page to discourage reinsertion without consensus. Do you think I approached this situation appropriately? I’d like to ensure I’m handling these disputes in line with Wikipedia’s best practices. Thanks in advance! --PrintHallo (talk) 11:10, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
RevDel requestWhat can be done about this edit summary by an IP editor?: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Predator_2&oldid=1303211937 George Ho (talk) 06:26, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Foot standHey. That's funny. I've never had someone else fixing the same thing at the same time on Wikipedia. Thanks for adding the foot stand anchor. I learned something new today. That is very helpful. I restored the link from Inline Skates to point to the visible anchor. Thanks! Fred Hsu (talk) 14:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
This is just a ping to let you know that I believe I addressed your clear clarification-needed notes. Thanks a lot. See my last comment on GA1. I am sure there are more to be enhanced. I left notes for myself to follow-up when I resume in a day or two. Thanks! Fred Hsu (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from Zongalez (07:18, 6 August 2025)Hello! I have recently begun my editing journey in areas of interest - armed forces, music, business - within and outside India, and martial arts. I was updating the fighter records on the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasmine_Parr In the Win Loss Column there is a template used to give the result and a background colour. I attempted to use the Yes2 template, which is already in use in the previous results, but it would never give the result, just a underlying syntax text. When you get the time, please help me understand how to do this. Thank you Z --Zongalez (talk) 07:18, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from Stretch777 on Template:User Wikipedia/WikiGoon (21:54, 6 August 2025)What is my next objective? --Stretch777 (talk) 21:54, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2025News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia