I saw that you have been doing an edit in the article Nieuweschans dialect. I want to tell you that this article is almost certainly a hoax. There is also an article in the Dutch Wikipedia, and it has been nominated for deletion. The so called 'sources' in the articles are all complete nonsense, and they all have been published only some days ago.
F.i. the 'photo of an newspaper. Which newspaper? And why is it unreadable? The other so called sources, they have no name of an author at all, so that nobody can determine of this has been written by a relyable linguist or by someone who wants to make a joke.
I am working in NL-WP and I am not familiar with the procedure of nominating articles in EN-WP, so maybe you are willing to nominate this nonsense for deletion here. Thanks, Erik Wannee (talk) 08:25, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Btw: all other contributions of this person are nonsense, too. So I think a cleaning / reverting operation will be necessary on several articles. Erik Wannee (talk) 08:28, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How did you find that link (out of curiosity)? On United States Naval Sea Cadet Corps
I was having trouble linking promotion I was wondering how you achieved linking it to the proper one as I honestly could find zero so I can do it like that in the future. (would save time) Tokeamour (talk) 21:33, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can't remember specifically which list or tool I found that link from but take a look at Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links where there are several approaches to finding links to disambiguation pages. To highlight them in your own editing go to yur preferences (drop down list top right) & choose the "gadgets" tab, then scroll down to "Appearance" & put a tick next to "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange".— Rodtalk07:16, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]