User talk:Wowzers122

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Papua conflict, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 02:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kamituga, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wowzers122, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Nduma Defense of Congo-Renovated have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me about that I plan on going back and rewriting it to paraphrase it better as well as cite my edits. Wowzers122 (talk) 22:36, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd Like to thanks you for helping me keep the 2020 Democratic Republic of the Congo attacks updated. --Garmin21 (talk) 19:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Always source what you add and don't copy from sources. Many of your statements are mostly copied except for a few minor word alterations. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 18:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that I will try to summarize my sources better. Wowzers122 (talk) 03:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a hint: read the source; hide the source; wait 60 seconds; write your summary in a text editor based on what you remember, without looking at the source: unless you've trained in raw memorisation, your wording will almost certainly differ from the source; after you've written your text, go back to the source and make corrections where your text is misleading or inaccurate, since it's likely that you mis-remembered some details. Boud (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add any sources you can find about Somali Guardian at Talk:Timeline of the Tigray War#Somali Guardian. The claims made by the source are highly significant for the Tigray War, and so far, we don't have any third-party sources that either claim that the newspaper is serious or that it provides fake news. We don't even have the website's own claims about who runs it or who the chief editor is. Boud (talk) 16:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the same person as Woofers who handles the Map Ethiopia twitter account? I can assist in relocating some of the photos and films displayed, as I know Tigray quite well. Jnyssen (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jnyssen: I am not.

You can always dm the Twitter account.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

El_C 15:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
98		Mitiga International Airport (talk)	Add sources
46		Oromo–Somali clashes (talk)	Add sources
24		Ndogboyosoi War (talk)	Add sources
48		United Nations Force Intervention Brigade (talk)	Add sources
52		Irob people (talk)	Add sources
167		Allied Democratic Forces (talk)	Add sources
35		Insurgency in Meghalaya (talk)	Cleanup
38		2016 Ethiopian protests (talk)	Cleanup
3		Hama Governorate clashes (2011–2012) (talk)	Cleanup
797		Tigray People's Liberation Front (talk)	Expand
51		Katanga insurgency (talk)	Expand
172		Ba'ath Party (Iraqi-dominated faction) (talk)	Expand
320		Lord's Resistance Army insurgency (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
349		Royal Households of the United Kingdom (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
384		Meles Zenawi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24		Congolese National Liberation Front (talk)	Merge
221		United Liberation Front of Asom (talk)	Merge
317		Islamabad Capital Territory (talk)	Merge
293		United Nations Operation in the Congo (talk)	Wikify
6,866		Ethiopia (talk)	Wikify
85		Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (talk)	Wikify
2		Jira Bulahi Bad (talk)	Orphan
508		Andrés Arauz (talk)	Orphan
2		Jatri Uld Said Uld Yumani (talk)	Orphan
7		Debub Misraqawi Zone (talk)	Stub
204		2021 Ethiopian general election (talk)	Stub
8		Pretoria Accord (talk)	Stub
175		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
36		Beni, Democratic Republic of the Congo (talk)	Stub
15		Addis Standard (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122

Thank you for creating Battle of Humera.

User:Csgir, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for taking out the time to create this.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Csgir}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Csgir (talk) 10:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kooki instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

We already have an article on this kingdom. This draft contains more information than the article, and the article can be expanded.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kooki Kingdom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kooki Kingdom, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Democratic Republic of the Congo–Egypt relations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of participants in the Kivu conflict, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Democratic Republic of the Congo–Egypt relations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tigray War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of participants in the Kivu conflict".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:39, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of wars involving Belarus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 21:58, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guy Mazig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guy Mazig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
45		Oromia–Somali clashes (talk)	Add sources
607		2008 (talk)	Add sources
7		Yemane Niguse (talk)	Add sources
572		Boko Haram insurgency (talk)	Add sources
41		Transitional Government of Tigray (talk)	Add sources
13		Blue Planet (role-playing game) (talk)	Add sources
97		Politics of Ethiopia (talk)	Cleanup
9		Dogu'a Tembien (talk)	Cleanup
919		Insurgency in Cabo Delgado (talk)	Cleanup
209		Oromo Liberation Front (talk)	Expand
96		Cabinda War (talk)	Expand
47		Timeline of the War in Afghanistan (2001–present) (talk)	Expand
36		Ethnic discrimination in Ethiopia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
54,369		United States at the 2020 Summer Olympics (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,712		Operation Blue Star (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,365		COVID-19 vaccination in the United States (talk)	Merge
42		Military history of South Africa during World War I (talk)	Merge
52		Dutch Loango-Angola (talk)	Merge
212		Uganda Protectorate (talk)	Wikify
9		Laksmi Pamuntjak (talk)	Wikify
515		Idriss Déby (talk)	Wikify
3		Edo prison break (talk)	Orphan
9		Halgan District (talk)	Orphan
1		Gena C. Lovett (talk)	Orphan
3		António Júlio da Costa Pereira de Eça (talk)	Stub
12		Beshasha (talk)	Stub
268		Prosperity Party (talk)	Stub
6		Bil Clemons (talk)	Stub
24		Bilal Ag Acherif (talk)	Stub
140		Getachew Reda (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:57, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyesnore was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Oromo Liberation Front. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oromo Liberation Army and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oromo Liberation Army, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyesnore 23:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see note on Talk:Western Togoland Rebellion | WP:NPOV. I feel there are problems with this article. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.--Natsubee (talk) 04:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Draft:Houston County Career Academy has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://hcca.hcbe.net/abouttheschool. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 23:52, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oromo Liberation Army, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Al-Duwaima Crisis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sinai Tribal Union, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—2022 Baghdad clashes—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 18:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Congressional Caucus on Macedonia and Macedonian Americans, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work updating the articles on Vermont's gubernatorial elections, including at least one I created for which Walton said there were no results. Billmckern (talk) 23:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Billmckern: Thanks! I happened to have a lot of free time on my hands and felt like filling in some of the holes. Wowzers122 (talk) 00:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tigray War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edaga Hamus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Union of the Nation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Noukouma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

North8000 (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. Thank you for your work on Battle of Noukouma. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work. The battle is mentioned in several other article. Suggest searching to find them and then linking in both directions. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited 2023 Democratic Republic of the Congo general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aljazeera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Wowzers122, thank for your for contributing Wikipedia articles about 2024 Puntland presidential election. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might be interested in becoming a member of WikiProject Puntland, where we are trying to fill the Puntland gap on English Wikipedia. You can sign up under 'New registrations' on Wikipedia:WikiProject Puntland/New members. QalasQalas (talk) 12:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. Thank you for your work on 1863 Georgia gubernatorial election. Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great start, but more sources would be good.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 19:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wowzers122. Thank you for your work on 1793 Rauracian Republic annexation referendum. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just a thought re maps like this – it might be better to leave out the legend and instead put it in the caption section (like e.g. 2012 Senegalese presidential election), as this will ensure the text displays at a size that is legible to readers (the Algerian maps display at a size that is slightly too small for the legend to be legible (at least for me)). You can also add the legend to the description on commons so other language wikis can copy it across. Cheers, Number 57 21:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: First, I would like to say that out of respect, I have enlarged the legend on all the maps. However, I do believe that all of the previous maps (well maybe not the third one) were legible as they were on both mobile and PC (both of which are old and small), nor have I gotten a complaint about the legend from any of the people I've shown it to on my social medias. I try my best to make sure legends on my maps are legible and not too overly complicated or cluttery. Unfortunately, I am only human, and so my judgement is never perfect even then I don't understand why it would be so hard to increase the size of the map in the infobox (isn't that what makes SVGs so great?) or better yet, why can't a reader simply click on the image and enlarge it? The reason why I've moved away from legends in the caption recently (beyond it looking ugly in my opinion) is that people should be able to take and use the maps for whatever they want without having to add their own legend outside of Wikipedia. This isn't a theoretical either. I've seen my maps posted in the wild on social media and I've seen Wikipedia maps (not mine) used in papers. A smaller reason I don't like to use legends in the captions of my national maps is that some foreign wikis seem to be allergic to them. A clear example is that the captionless map of the 2023 Senegalese presidential election is used on english Wikipedia and other wikis but others use the captioned one. Wowzers122 (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was only a suggestion. But I would say that rather than talking to people on social media, it really should be discussed here with other editors. There seems to be far too much off-wiki discussion, which is not really fair to editors who are not on such platforms.

The advantage of having the legend in the caption section is that editors do not have to click through to read it (plus legends that I guess it would be difficult for you to expand (like 2019) appear blurry at the scale currently shown). And I would also suggest that things published on commons should be primarily done so with use on Wikipedia in mind, not really off-wiki. Cheers, Number 57 03:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: My nerdiness for elections does not stop at Wikipedia and I will enjoy that hobby on social media with other people, including fellow editors. However, beyond presentation, finding data, finding shapefiles, etc, I do not have discussions about my problems with Wikipedia pages or take their opinions into consideration. Anytime I've had a qualm about a page, such as existing data or text, I've gone to the talk page and spoke my grievances. And any editor can message me on my talk page or a Wikipedia page (such as you have) and I will be here to respond.

Everything I post on wikicommons I do so with Wikipedia in mind. However, wikicommons is not just a database for wiki foundation images but also has the aim of being a media file repository that "makes available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content to all." As such, I want to make sure everyone who wishes to use my images (and I'm not talking about election nerd twitter) can do so without having to go through the process of adding a legend. Wowzers122 (talk) 05:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I wasn't trying to say you shouldn't do this beyond Wikipedia, just that discussions regarding how to do things on Wikipedia (which would include presentation) should be done on Wikipedia so that all editors have the opportunity to chip in (there have been a few times in the last couple of years when editors have said that they made a change as a result of a discussion with other editors off-wiki, which isn't really inclusive or fair). Cheers, Number 57 15:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that but it seems to be wrong. Each candidate won four counties, but you show Madison winning five. Wehwalt (talk) 22:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wehwalt: Sorry, it's been fixed now. Wowzers122 (talk) 23:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to 1909 Chinese provincial elections has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 14:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You removed my edit on the Luba Kingdom for not citing a source but I did cite a source at the end. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520334908/the-rainbow-and-the-kings If you want to dicuss it further, discord is more convenient for me, I mentioned you in the server there as well. If you still want to remove it please let me know what's wrong with it instead of deleting the whole thing. VarangianTheMapper (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wowzers122, thank you for reminding me about "Thats not how openings are written", so I will follow the example in MOS:TITLEABSENTBOLD next time in other articles.

For "some information were removed," I thought the list of parties in "Member parties of Rwanda's ruling government coalition ..." was unnecessary, but apparently not. Is there other relevant information I removed?

I am confused about "a lot of the new wording sounds weird and unencyclopedic." Could you be more specific and give me 3 quotes? Or was it just the active voice? 174.92.25.207 (talk) 04:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am having a hard time seeing how my "wording sounds weird" while the following weird grammatical errors exist earlier on this talk page:

• "social medias" (correctly, either "socials" or "social media accounts")
• "a qualm about a page, such as existing data or text" (missing "about" after "such as")
• "spoke my grievances" (correctly, air/express/vent/voice)

There is also unnatural English in the original version such as "expressed thanks to voters" (more Google hits for "thanked voters") EDIT: the actual reason is because I usually see the more common "expressed his gratitude to voters".

I will perform some less controversial copyediting without removing any facts. Please state any specific concerns. 174.92.25.207 (talk) 04:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both "expressed thanks to voters" and "thanked voters" are grammatically correct and natural. The former is more formal, while the latter is more casual.

I didn't like what you removed in shortening phrases like "approved constitutional amendments" to just "allow". I feel like it removes the specifics of what the referendum did and changes it to something more basic. I'm also not a fan of changing "Kagame told France 24 that he intended to run for president again in the 2024 election" to "promised France 24 to run in 2024." Saying he intended to do something and that he promised to run gives a different connotation.

For weird wording, removing words like "announced" feels weird. The original sentence was "Kagame announced his bid for a fourth term on 20 September 2023 in an interview," and you changed to "Kagame bid for a fourth term on 20 September 2023 in a Jeune Afrique interview." I don't like how that sounds.

Yes, I would prefer if the parties in the coalition endorsing were listed. I also didn't like removing "if registered in time" to just "wanted," or removing the detail that Ingabire had previously been disqualified from running to just that he was convicted. I'm not a fan of removing the fact that the three candidates were the only legal candidates running last time. Lastly, I didn't like changing "Kagame pledged to continue his policies upon reelection" to "pledged unchanged policies."

Maybe I'm being too picky, and if you think so, I won't stop you from re-adding your changes. However, please don't do what you did to the lead again. Wowzers122 (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was indeed wrong to write the unnatural "Kagame bid for". After rereading that, I agree it feels weird, and I think the original "Kagame announced his bid for" is more common. You were not "being too picky." I am in the minority of Wikipedia editors that cares about WP:TERSE, while the majority just uses long sentences with passive voice and buried verbs, and this time I might have cut too many words.

"intended" vs "promised", I used "promised" based on the election promise collocation. I suppose promises are made to voters not media. I'll leave the word "intended" with its connotations, as well as other DUE POV things like the only legal candidates.

It is a bit like quoting out of context to say I shortened '"approved constitutional amendments" to just "allow"'. The full context is that I changed 'A referendum in 2015 approved constitutional amendments" that would allow ...' to 'A constitutional referendum in 2015 allowed ...' I can't imagine it could do anything other than approve amendments, but I will avoid changing that part as I can't think of how to squeeze the word "amendments" in. You seem to dislike non-monetary nouns after "pledged". Ok, for consistency, I won't change the other two "pledged to"s either.

Ingabire's pronouns are she/her. I think you are claiming causation for "Ingabire had previously been disqualified." The article is not clear, and I will try to reword the sentences to emphasize the causation.

I won't touch the lead sentence, but I need to remove "by many" per WP:WEASEL.

I might tag "if registered in time" with {{clarify}}. I think I'm missing the context and background as to why that's important. Perhaps you could edit in an explanation. 174.92.25.207 (talk) 06:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Ankole, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 17:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wrongly reverted you in Sri Lankan Civil War page. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. In the coming days, I'm going to open up an RFC on how to present Jefferson in the 1796 United States presidential election's infobox. I think putting "(elected Vice President)" into a footnote, would be best. So far, we can't seem to get enough editor input. GoodDay (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wowzers122,

I noticed you reverted an edit which added a new disc logo to the US political parties list—why did you do so? (I’m not mad at you—I’m just wondering). 73.208.8.125 (talk) 00:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file you added lacked a source. Wowzers122 (talk) 01:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok—what do you mean? I checked and it looked like there was a source (own work).

(This is the same person as the person who started this conversation—I just forgot to sign into my account the first time.) RiverMan18 (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean own work? An image should only be used if it's the official logo used by the party, not made up by someone. Wowzers122 (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s based off of the political party’s official logo, like all the other disc logos. RiverMan18 (talk) 01:52, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use the actual party logo, not some made up thing that's original research. Wowzers122 (talk) 01:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You sure? Again, all the existing disc logos are almost certainly based off of the official logos but are user-created (ex. the Liberal Party USA official logo and the Liberal Party USA election disc), and those are still up. I think that might be in part because the existing party logos are non-free images or something (I’m sorry—I’m not very familiar with Wikipedia policy—I’m a newish user myself).

I’m just worried that this might affect all the disc logos. RiverMan18 (talk) 02:03, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other disc logos are acceptable because they are officially used by the party, such as the Republican disc, which appears on their website (https://gop.com/) and social media. In contrast, the Conservative Party only uses a single official logo (https://www.cpnys.org/). Any other symbols would constitute original research, as they are not officially recognized by the party. Wowzers122 (talk) 02:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. So would disc logos which are based on the original logo (for example, the party’s logo or a symbol associated with the party in a circle) be allowed? (ex. essentially any of the disc logos we currently have besides the Democratic and Republican ones)

Thanks! RiverMan18 (talk) 03:07, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you removed the Working Families Party disc logo (I can see why--it has little resemblance to the actual logo). Would another disc which bears more resemblance to the logo (ex. the old "WF" Working Families Party logo in a circle) be ok?

FYI: I added a note to the political parties list about the election discs.

I'm sorry to keep bugging you about this. RiverMan18 (talk) 01:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You reverted my edit due to it being "Unsourced". However, if you would look closely, the information in that graph reflects the information already present in the same part of the infobox, which is cited already. So I would like to hear why you would say such things. Jayson (talk) 04:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What source shows that position on that graph? Synthesizing information together is original research. The infobox also doesn't even provide a section for political graphs. Wowzers122 (talk) 04:19, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The info box claims the economic position of the party is left-wing wing, with a citation. I put it exactly in that position on the graph. The same goes for social issues. I put it exactly as it was described TEN PIXELS ABOVE. Jayson (talk) 04:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to explain it to you the most simple I can: The information has 2 citations that both say that Aontu is Economically Left-wing and Socially Right-wing. All I did was make a graph for it. It doesn't matter whether they took the time to make a graph for it, but they described the position in terms that I could use to make a graph. It said it was economically left wing, and I put it on the X axis that exact way. If you want to we can put up a talk page for what "left wing" means on the exact location of the political compass. I will not put the graph back, but I want discussion surrounding whether it is good or not. Thank you. Jayson (talk) 04:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right that I was mistaken, they do convey the same information, but they don’t include any graph like that. The position of the graph is arbitrary. Why is the dot in one area and not another within the economic left, social right field? There needs to be a source stating the dot should be in a certain area and those increments need meaning to them. Additionally, it is redundant since the positions are already shown, and there shouldn't even be a political graph because the infobox does not provide a parameter for it. Wowzers122 (talk) 04:58, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with what you said. It is a bit vague. I will now explain it, with the example being the x axis. The furthest left is the "far left" and the center is well, the center. The one in between those two is "left wing" and how I came up with this is, after multiple years of reading Wikipedia articles, I noticed parties, for example, "left wing to far left" like the La France Insoumise, I thought it meant somewhere in between those points. After a while it kinda got ingrained in my head, which is why both my description and the articles description are too vague to do so. So I think I put that there to try and experiment with graphs on wikipedia, see what the community thinks of graphs that visualise it, but after all this I kinda think "what does it mean at this point to be left wing" and "does it mean broudly on the left, a specific point?" and now I think "maybe not all sources have the same measurements" so I now say we need more input and it was probably a bad idea in the first place. Jayson (talk) 05:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wowzers, I saw that you reverted some of my edits on US political party pages to remove the new template with the reason being that there was not a consensus.

Please let me know if this is not an appropriate reason, but there was an agreement on an RFC I did that the disc logos should be removed (as they have been) and that party color should be used to primarily distinguish the political parties on articles such as the party list. (If that’s not the conclusion you take away from the RFC, please let me know). The creation of the new template was a way to better emphasize the color in the absence of the disc logos.

Again, please let me know if you believe this to be insufficient reason for the new template or an insufficient consensus. If so, I will try to solicit opinions from other users (if you believe that’s necessary) or remove the template from the pages it is currently up on (I put it up on other US political party pages, but I will remove it if you want me to.)

Thanks! RiverMan18 (talk) 04:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The RFC was about the disc logos, not the creation of an entirely new infobox. Establishing a new template as a standard requires consensus, and I, for one, oppose it. There is no reason why American parties should be presented differently from other parties. The colors are already displayed in the infobox, and adding a large colored area is ugly imo. Wowzers122 (talk) 11:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok—thanks! I’ll try to get a consensus—I’ll make sure to remove the current templates until the consensus is reached (and will only put them back if it is in favor). RiverMan18 (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I join in on this consensus? Jayson (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can join in at Template talk:Infobox US political party. Sorry for the late reply, but thanks for wanting to pitch in! RiverMan18 (talk) 13:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! Jayson (talk) 15:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wowzers122, I'm sorry to bug you (again), but I was wondering if you could help me and another editor out with a potential problem. Another editor (who does not have an account) was wondering if they could edit the List of political parties in the United States article in ways which might impact the article greatly. Although we do agree on some things, we disagree on others, and I was wondering if you could provide a third opinion on the matter due to the disagreements and the scale of the changes.

Here is a link to the prior discussion.

Thanks!

(Yes, we did start an RFC on the matter which was shut down due to problems with WP:RFC. I'm sorry--I'm still relatively new to Wikipedia.) RiverMan18 (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wowzers122. Thank you for your work on Troup party. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Union of Federalists and Independent Republicans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lamuka logo alt 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:21, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lamuka logo alt 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:21, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Congo War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bush administration.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is the same party as Congolese Democratic Front or are they two different and distinct political parties? Dan arndt (talk) 03:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan arndt: It's a party in the other congo. Wowzers122 (talk) 04:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for my ignorance about post-colonial African states. It was just that i was in the process of moving the article (by removing the abbreviation as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style) and found that Front Démocratique Congolais was a redirect to Congolese Democratic Front. Is it worth establishing a disambiguation page, which differentiates between the two articles? Dan arndt (talk) 04:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan arndt: Would make sense. Wowzers122 (talk) 12:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wowzers122. Thank you for your work on Front Démocratique Congolais (DRC). Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi. Great bit of history. I notice that Ref 10, Ref 14 and Ref 18 have harv errors. They need looked at.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 22:09, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your work on 1986 Sudanese parliamentary election FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:40, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1852 United States presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 July 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1793 French legislative election in Saint-Domingue, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1793, Jean-Baptiste Belley (pictured), a former black slave, was elected as a deputy to the French National Convention? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1793 French legislative election in Saint-Domingue. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1793 French legislative election in Saint-Domingue), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wowzers122, for the second running of the Developing Countries WikiContest, it is now open for submissions. Welcome to the contest! You can now list your work at your submissions page to earn points. The coordinators have addressed some of the queries at the last contest and we are hopeful that it'll turn out great for you—yes, you! If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions on the talk page.
• Got open nominations? List them at the review requests sidebar.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews. Remember, reviews now award 10 points!
• Not sure if your article qualifies? See the scoring rules for more information or contact a coordinator.
• Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open throughout the contest, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:58, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alliance Fleuve Congo logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Have you made a Usage Request of the Kouré attack photos made by a Hausa-language VOA journalist ?

Yours sincerely, Wisdood (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:PD-USGov-VOA. Wowzers122 (talk) 17:29, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Systemic Bias Barnstar
		Great work on Saint-Domingue legislative elections articles, and this list! It is appreciated. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Next time someone uploads such blatant copyvio could you please use the copyvio template instead of creating a deletion request? No point in going through a consensus building in such cases. It just adds to the backlog Trade (talk) 19:09, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Wowzers122 (talk) 19:18, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I originally made the Maquis of Fizi article and as my first article from scratch it had some issues, so I sincerely appreciate your efforts in improving its contents. I'd also like to apologize for the (unintentional) copyright violation, I had simply translated what seemed relevant from the sources I had but I get now why that was inappropriate. Cheers Xenosystem (talk) 11:31, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We're a month into the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest, with stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard already! Our current top five contestants are:

1. Spookyaki (submissions) – 256 points, mostly from a handful of GAs about women's history in Latin America as well as the 1991 Haitian coup d'état.
2. vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 229 points, back with a number of articles on abortion in various African countries.
3. simongraham (submissions) – 213 points, mainly from GAs on species of jumping spiders in both Africa and Azerbaijan.
4. PizzaKing13 (submissions) – 200 points, with five GAs on articles relating to Salvadoran politics, history, and griddle cakes.
5. BeanieFan11 (submissions) – 168 points from a few GAs, a few DYKs, and a few ITNs on athletes from a variety of countries.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier!

On behalf of the coordinators, we'd like to thank all the participants for helping to combat systemic bias on Wikipedia! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Administrators and Editors,

I hope this message finds you well.

I am reaching out in regard to a recent edit I made to the Wikipedia page about the Gedo region in Somalia. I changed the classification of Gedo from being a regional administrative division under Jubaland to a federal member state in formation. This edit was reverted, and I would like to respectfully appeal that decision by providing further context and justification based on recent political and administrative developments within Somalia.

1. 1. 1. Background:

Gedo, while historically recognized as one of the regions within Jubaland, is currently at the center of a significant political realignment in Somalia. The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has, in recent months, asserted direct administrative and military control over the region, particularly in the town of Beled-Xaawo. This move follows ongoing disputes between the federal authorities and the Jubaland administration regarding the legitimacy and governance of Gedo.

As of recent reports (mid-2025), the Somali federal government has:

- Dispatched federal security forces to Gedo, particularly Beled-Xaawo, removing regional Jubaland forces. - Appointed new federal-level officials, including a regional NISA commander, without coordination with Jubaland. - Publicly stated, through government channels and allied media, that it does not recognize Jubaland’s claim over Gedo. - Actively explored the possibility of formalizing Gedo as a federal member state in its own right, in line with growing regional demands and the political climate.

1. 1. 1. Why the Edit is Justified:

My edit reflects the **ongoing political transition** and current **factual control** of Gedo by the federal government. The status of Gedo as a "region under Jubaland" is no longer uncontested, and therefore the Wikipedia entry should reflect the **disputed and dynamic reality** rather than present it as a settled matter.

This change was not made as an act of personal opinion or original research, but rather based on:

- Official statements from the Federal Government of Somalia. - Reliable news coverage from Somali media and international sources. - Direct military and administrative actions by the Somali government on the ground.

I would be happy to provide citations and references from credible sources to support this update, including:

1. [Caasimada.net - Federal Government explores new Gedo strategy](https://www.caasimada.net/xog-df-oo-kala-dooraneysa-3-tallaabo-oo-kiiska-jubaland-ay-ku-wajihi-karto) 2. [Goobjooge.net - Federal forces take control of Beled-Xaawo](https://www.goobjooge.net/wararkii-ugu-danbeeyay-ee-gedo-c-rashiid-janan-oo-ka-laabtay-beled-xaawo-ciidamada-dowladda-oo-la-wareegay) 3. [Shabelle Media - Fighting erupts in Beled-Xaawo after NISA reshuffle](https://shabellemedia.com/dagaal-culus-oo-ka-dhacay-beled-xaawo-kadib-markii-la-keenay-taliyaha-cusub-ee-nisa-gedo)

1. 1. 1. Request:

I respectfully request that the Wikipedia page on Gedo be updated to reflect the **current political status and federal presence**, acknowledging that Gedo is a **disputed region** and currently under **direct federal administration**, with **active efforts to establish it as a federal member state**.

Please advise me on any format requirements or additional references you may need to validate this change. I am committed to ensuring that the information on Wikipedia remains neutral, verifiable, and in line with Wikipedia's core content policies.

Thank you very much for your time and understanding.

Sincerely,

Xaliimo123 (talk) 11:38, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

maakhir is not State Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I hope this message finds you well.

I am writing to formally appeal the reversion of edits made to the Wikipedia entry regarding Maakhir, which were intended to reflect its updated political and administrative status as of July–August 2025. Based on recent and verifiable developments, Maakhir is no longer simply a historical or regional name, but is now part of the newly ratified North Eastern Federal State (SSC-Khaatumo), as officially recognized by the Federal Government of Somalia.

🔹 Reliable and Recent Sources:

1. Ministry of Interior, Federal Affairs & Reconciliation (MoIFAR), Somalia

Official Statement dated 1 August 2025 confirming the completion of the state formation process in Laascaanood for the SSC-Khaatumo State, with inclusion of Maakhir region. (moifar.gov.so/en/2025)

2. Federal Government Weekly Briefing – 1 August 2025

Acknowledges the establishment of SSC-Khaatumo as a federal member state with inclusive representation from regions including Maakhir. (moi.gov.so)

3. Caasimada Online (Somali news outlet), 15 July 2025

Reports Maakhir’s inclusion in the new federal entity and its administrative realignment under SSC-Khaatumo. (caasimada.net)

🔹 Reason for the Appeal:

The content I submitted aimed to reflect these credible developments and enhance the article's accuracy. The reversion to the previous version, classifying Maakhir merely as a historical or unrecognized region, no longer aligns with current realities. The updated content is not original research, but rather a summary of events documented by official Somali government sources and well-established media outlets.

🔹 Request:

I respectfully request that the article be reviewed and revised to include:

The updated status of Maakhir as part of SSC-Khaatumo/Northeast Federal State.

References to the July–August 2025 developments with proper citation.

Neutral language that adheres to Wikipedia standards but reflects the most recent facts.

Thank you for your time and dedication to maintaining the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia content. I am happy to provide further references or make additional adjustments as needed.

Sincerely,

Xaliimo123 (talk) 13:18, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]